-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 14, 2021 – Decided November 1, 2021 Before Judges Mawla and Mitterhoff. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … policies, High Point and Farm Family disagreed about which company was responsible for providing coverage since both … for coverage provided on an excess basis. Since neither company provided immediate relief, on February 6, 2020, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 23, 2021 – Decided March 17, 2021 Before Judges Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … between defendant and Toms River Township pertaining to complaints for violation of a municipal ordinance for … and dismissed the appeal. Defendant raises the following points on this appeal: 4 A-0281-19 POINT 1 – THE TRIAL JUDGE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 23, 2021 – Decided March 17, 2021 Before Judges Mawla and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … between defendant and Toms River Township pertaining to complaints for violation of a municipal ordinance for … and dismissed the appeal. Defendant raises the following points on this appeal: 4 A-0281-19 POINT 1 – THE TRIAL JUDGE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 14, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Currier and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … the ground. Any property beyond a unit's deck was deemed a common element. Joan Carella also purchased a unit at The … ultra vires because it authorized the modification of the common elements without the unanimous consent of all of the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior … se. Fredric M. Knapp, Morris County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Paula Jordao, Assistant Prosecutor, on the … 2 A-3466-15T1 On appeal, defendant argues the following points: POINT I THE 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' IN ANY PART OF THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale. On appeal from Superior … se. Fredric M. Knapp, Morris County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Paula Jordao, Assistant Prosecutor, on the … 2 A-3466-15T1 On appeal, defendant argues the following points: POINT I THE 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' IN ANY PART OF THE …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 6, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Nugent. On appeal from Superior … the Law Division's summary judgment order dismissing their complaint in this case. They also appeal the Law Division's … arguments, which substantially overlap with or repeat the points in their main brief: Point I. Pursuit of the case is …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 6, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Nugent. On appeal from Superior … the Law Division's summary judgment order dismissing their complaint in this case. They also appeal the Law Division's … arguments, which substantially overlap with or repeat the points in their main brief: Point I. Pursuit of the case is …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 11, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … approval. Berkeley Point initially conveyed what would become plaintiffs' property to Anton and Irene Smutko by a … that the outer boundaries of the waterfront lots are at the points where the solid sidelines first intersect another …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 11, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … approval. Berkeley Point initially conveyed what would become plaintiffs' property to Anton and Irene Smutko by a … that the outer boundaries of the waterfront lots are at the points where the solid sidelines first intersect another …
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4228-15T3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SANDY RECOVERY DIVISION, … and ERIK CARNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SANDY RECOVERY DIVISION, … Submitted January 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Leone and Mawla. On appeal from the Department …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4228-15T3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SANDY RECOVERY DIVISION, … and ERIK CARNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SANDY RECOVERY DIVISION, … Submitted January 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Leone and Mawla. On appeal from the Department …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 7, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … them here. On direct appeal, defendant raised the following points: POINT I: THE PROSECUTOR'S CROSS-EXAMINATION AND COMMENTS REGARDING DEFENDANT'S DELAY IN CLAIMING …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 7, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … them here. On direct appeal, defendant raised the following points: POINT I: THE PROSECUTOR'S CROSS-EXAMINATION AND COMMENTS REGARDING DEFENDANT'S DELAY IN CLAIMING …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Accurso. On appeal from Superior … evidence. The facts the State established are comprehensively detailed in our decision on defendant's … DEPRIVING THE PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHTS TO HAVE DUE PROCESS, COMPULSORY PROCESS TO OBTAIN WITNESSES IN HIS FAVOR AND THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Nugent and Accurso. On appeal from Superior … evidence. The facts the State established are comprehensively detailed in our decision on defendant's … DEPRIVING THE PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHTS TO HAVE DUE PROCESS, COMPULSORY PROCESS TO OBTAIN WITNESSES IN HIS FAVOR AND THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from the Superior … rider to his August 27 order. We add only limited comments regarding three of the issues raised by defendant. … them here. On direct appeal defendant raised the following points: POINT I: THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF HEARSAY AND …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 21, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from the Superior … rider to his August 27 order. We add only limited comments regarding three of the issues raised by defendant. … them here. On direct appeal defendant raised the following points: POINT I: THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF HEARSAY AND …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 31, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Reisner. On appeal from Superior … be posted on the prostitution web page. Defendant's laptop computer and cell phones, including the one seized from his … ring. Defendant's counseled brief raises the following points: Point 1 The trial court erred in denying defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 31, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Reisner. On appeal from Superior … be posted on the prostitution web page. Defendant's laptop computer and cell phones, including the one seized from his … ring. Defendant's counseled brief raises the following points: Point 1 The trial court erred in denying defendant's …