-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Sumners and Natali. On appeal from the New Jersey Commissioner of Education, Agency Docket No. 146-6/15. … measure of security in the ranks they hold after years of service." Viemeister v. Bd. 4 A-3066-16T2 of Educ., 5 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… argues that the court relied in its decision on the committee comment to the previous version of the bill, 2 … reconsideration or rehearing “not later than 20 days after service of the judgment or order upon all parties by the … motions are rarely granted. Cummings v. Barr, 295 N.J. Super 374, 384 (App. Div. 1996). Rule 4:49-2, provides that …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … v. Blake, 444 N.J. Super. 285, 294 (App. Div. 2016), we are compelled to reverse and remand this matter for an … probability" that the deficient performance affected the outcome of the proceeding. Fritz, 105 N.J. at 58. A defendant's …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … appellant's total score was one, indicating "a recommendation for placement into minimum custody status." … be applied by the [DOC's] Institutional Classification Committee [(ICC)] to determine whether an inmate is eligible …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0995-15T2 A-0996-15T2 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMITMENT OF W.K. _____________________________ IN THE … a psychiatric facility or hospital because other available services will not meet the patient's needs. [In re …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … of loss of recreation privileges, and ten days of loss of commutation time. Venable immediately appealed the decision. … N.J. 571, 579–80 (1980) (citing Campbell v. Dep't of Civil Service, 39 N.J. 556, 562 (1963)). In determining whether an …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … events: (a) Reaching the age of eighteen (18) years or completion of college education, whichever last occurs." … 39, 48 (2001) (Verniero, J. concurring). Writing for no audience other than the parties, we have no need to …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … explained that there were enough lights on the [apartment] complex building to allow her to see [defendant]. There were … mother's] car in front of her building. She described her complex as one single driveway in and out. [Defendant] would …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … (Mellon). On December 8, 2017, Mellon filed a foreclosure complaint against defendants.2 On December 12, 2017, Mellon served defendants with the complaint. Defendants never filed a responsive pleading. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … 31, 2018 order of the Special Civil Part dismissing her complaint for damages incurred as a result of her dog … . . . anything about the dog having the wrong food, or the diet being off. On October 31, 2018, the trial court entered …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … custody and parenting time and incorporating Dr. Joseph's recommendations. The MSA provided the parties with joint legal … parents," and "both parents are fit and well capable of competently providing for [their son's] practical and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … on May 10, 2019. His mother, Queen Bates (Bates), filed a Complaint on his behalf, as his guardian ad litem, asserting … and individually, asserting medical expenses and loss of services. Following trial, a jury found that Tim and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … lawsuit. The court concluded that plaintiff filed his complaint after the applicable statutes of limitations had … his work environment leading up to December 2019 had become hostile for discriminatory and retaliatory reasons. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … charge. Officer Sullivan reported that during a "linen compliance check" on the morning of February 15, 2024, he … field test result. The hearing officer concluded Fredlaw committed prohibited act *.203 by possessing CDS and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … order denying her order to show cause and dismissing her complaint against defendant Monmouth County Division of … Super. at 34. "Rule 4:67-6 exists 'to provide judicial remedies in aid of agency orders where necessary.'" Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … the Borough of Seaside Park (Borough). Their testimony encompassed incidents involving Cassarino's contact with law … affirmed the denial in an eleven-page written opinion and accompanying order. In his decision, Judge Fritch considered …
njcourts.gov
… path while rollerblading in the park. Arias filed a complaint alleging negligence against the County, which owns … motion, and the Appellate Division affirmed. See 479 N.J. Super. 268 (App. Div. 2024). The Court granted … taxes or indirectly through decreased or eliminated services. To avoid such risks and costs, municipalities …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … containing some retail but mostly residential units, in a commercial zone, which allows a maximum height of only … The property lies in the B-3 Zone, which allows only commercial uses and a maximum building height of twenty-five …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3458-22 A-3464-22 BRIAN KUBIEL, Complainant, v. TOMS RIVER DISTRICT NO. 1 BOARD OF FIRE … expenditure of time and effort. As such, a special service charge w[ould] be assessed" of $185 per hour for …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … to revise her job title so that she would enjoy civil service benefits. Plaintiff had a short tenure with the … in place there was illegal and had to be removed. The City complied with plaintiff's opinion, removed the temporary …