Filters
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1321-21 A-1588-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant/ … 4 A-1321-21 Division asked N.D. to identify any relative supports and referred her for another psychiatric screening, … and convincing evidence that prong one and prong two of the termination statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1, were met as J.D.'s …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3513-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to A.S. and failed to consider reasonable alternatives to termination. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3513-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to A.S. and failed to consider reasonable alternatives to termination. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the …
- A-39-15 Opinionnjcourts.gov… have been summarized.) In the Matter of the Adoption of a Child by J.E.V. and D.G.V. (A-39-15) (076767) Argued April … of first impression: whether an indigent parent who faces termination of her parental rights in a contested private … to have counsel assigned without cost.”). Drawing support from Rodriguez, and relying on due process grounds, …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-0446-17T4 A-0449-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Law Guardian, that there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of defendants' parental rights …
- A-0446-17T4/A-0449-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-0446-17T4 A-0449-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Law Guardian, that there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of defendants' parental rights …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … its position again, which the court approved, seeking termination of parental rights followed by adoption. During … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-2912-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … its position again, which the court approved, seeking termination of parental rights followed by adoption. During … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Katz and Velarde. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's plan for termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. At the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0545-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Katz and Velarde. The Law Guardian called no witnesses but supported the Division's plan for termination of parental rights, followed by adoption. At the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3365-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father contends that the judge erred in concluding that termination of his parental rights was in the best interests … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- A-3365-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3365-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the father contends that the judge erred in concluding that termination of his parental rights was in the best interests … Super. 81, 87 (App. Div. 2006). The factual findings that support such a judgment "should not be disturbed unless …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2191-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the four prongs of the best interests test warranting termination of her parental rights under N.J.S.A. … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports its findings. I. We summarize the pertinent facts …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2191-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the four prongs of the best interests test warranting termination of her parental rights under N.J.S.A. … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports its findings. I. We summarize the pertinent facts …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4701-16T1 NEW JERSEY OF DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brief). PER CURIAM Defendant, W.I.L (Wendy), appeals the termination of her parental rights to her youngest two … cross appeal and to realign her as a respondent as she now supports the trial court's termination of Wendy's parental …
- A-4701-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4701-16T1 NEW JERSEY OF DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … brief). PER CURIAM Defendant, W.I.L (Wendy), appeals the termination of her parental rights to her youngest two … cross appeal and to realign her as a respondent as she now supports the trial court's termination of Wendy's parental …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1594-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1594-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5048-17T4 A-5049-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and remand to the trial court to consider alternatives to termination because the court did not allow Julissa to … 596, 605 (2007). We must determine whether the decision is supported by substantial and credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- A-5048-17T4/A-5049-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5048-17T4 A-5049-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and remand to the trial court to consider alternatives to termination because the court did not allow Julissa to … 596, 605 (2007). We must determine whether the decision is supported by substantial and credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …