-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 8, 2020 – Decided May 27, 2020 Before Judges Fuentes and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … 13-07-1643. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Andrew R. Burroughs, Designated Counsel, on … N. Stephens II, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Matthew E. Hanley, Special Deputy Attorney …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … counterclaim against Morris Imaging and her third-party complaint against Morris Imaging's legal representatives, … the judge's order denying reconsideration. R.P.C. Claims In Points II, III, and IV of her reply brief, Semilia contends …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 29, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … counterclaim against Morris Imaging and her third-party complaint against Morris Imaging's legal representatives, … the judge's order denying reconsideration. R.P.C. Claims In Points II, III, and IV of her reply brief, Semilia contends …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 9, 2024 – Decided December 27, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino, Gummer and Berdote Byrne. On appeal … these arguments by failing to raise them during the public comment period that preceded the permit approval. … location would be infeasible. Because of that discrete shortcoming, we vacate the permit and verification, without …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 9, 2024 – Decided December 27, 2024 Before Judges Sabatino, Gummer and Berdote Byrne. On appeal … these arguments by failing to raise them during the public comment period that preceded the permit approval. … location would be infeasible. Because of that discrete shortcoming, we vacate the permit and verification, without …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … 08-04-1209. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Frank M. Gennaro, Designated Counsel, on the … he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the remaining points of purported ineffectiveness. A defendant is entitled …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior … 08-04-1209. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Frank M. Gennaro, Designated Counsel, on the … he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the remaining points of purported ineffectiveness. A defendant is entitled …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … including Fowler's nephews who were in the back seat, complied. Hearns, however, repeatedly tried to get out of … EXCESSIVE. In a pro se brief, Fowler asserts the following points: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT PREJUDICED THE DEFENDANT BY …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … including Fowler's nephews who were in the back seat, complied. Hearns, however, repeatedly tried to get out of … EXCESSIVE. In a pro se brief, Fowler asserts the following points: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT PREJUDICED THE DEFENDANT BY …
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Globe Motor Company v. Ilya Igdalev (074996) (A-43-14) Argued January … law. The prior litigation involved claims that Globe Motor Company (Globe) asserted against a limited liability company …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … of any opinion may not have been summarized.) Globe Motor Company v. Ilya Igdalev (074996) (A-43-14) Argued January … law. The prior litigation involved claims that Globe Motor Company (Globe) asserted against a limited liability company …
njcourts.gov
… JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3652-16T3 DREW BRADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAROLE BOYD, … On January 9, 2017, the trial judge held that Bradford's complaint would be dismissed for failure to file an … appeals from all three orders, presenting the following points of argument for our consideration: Point 1 JUDGE …
-
njcourts.gov
… JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3652-16T3 DREW BRADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAROLE BOYD, … On January 9, 2017, the trial judge held that Bradford's complaint would be dismissed for failure to file an … appeals from all three orders, presenting the following points of argument for our consideration: Point 1 JUDGE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 5, 2021 – Decided June 15, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … defendants) personally guaranteed the underlying $2,600,000 commercial loan. The stipulation, as the Law Division judge … prejudice. Now on appeal, the Bank raises the following points: 4 A-0355-20 POINT I THE [TRIAL] COURT HAS …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 5, 2021 – Decided June 15, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … defendants) personally guaranteed the underlying $2,600,000 commercial loan. The stipulation, as the Law Division judge … prejudice. Now on appeal, the Bank raises the following points: 4 A-0355-20 POINT I THE [TRIAL] COURT HAS …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically June 1, 2017 – Decided June 28, 2017 Before Judges Alvarez and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … ANY OF THE [DEFENDANT'S] DEFENSE. POINT II THE PCR COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN IT PROCEDURALLY BARRED … PROCESS OF THE LAW. Defendant further raises the following points in his reply brief: POINT I THE STATE'S CONTENTION TO …
njcourts.gov
… telephonically June 1, 2017 – Decided June 28, 2017 Before Judges Alvarez and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … ANY OF THE [DEFENDANT'S] DEFENSE. POINT II THE PCR COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN IT PROCEDURALLY BARRED … PROCESS OF THE LAW. Defendant further raises the following points in his reply brief: POINT I THE STATE'S CONTENTION TO …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically June 1, 2017 – Decided June 28, 2017 Before Judges Alvarez and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … ANY OF THE [DEFENDANT'S] DEFENSE. POINT II THE PCR COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN IT PROCEDURALLY BARRED … PROCESS OF THE LAW. Defendant further raises the following points in his reply brief: POINT I THE STATE'S CONTENTION TO …
-
njcourts.gov
… telephonically June 1, 2017 – Decided June 28, 2017 Before Judges Alvarez and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior … ANY OF THE [DEFENDANT'S] DEFENSE. POINT II THE PCR COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR WHEN IT PROCEDURALLY BARRED … PROCESS OF THE LAW. Defendant further raises the following points in his reply brief: POINT I THE STATE'S CONTENTION TO …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 31, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … incident was captured on surveillance video from a nearby commercial establishment and shown at trial. Defendant is … charges. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE DENIED DEFENDANT A FAIR …