Filters
- njcourts.gov… Argued November 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent, Reisner and Mawla. On appeal from … A REMAND ON THE ISSUE OF ALIMONY AND THE DEFENDANT’S INCOME FOR THE YEARS 2011 THROUGH 2013. POINT II: EVEN IF ONE … NEVERTHELESS ERRED IN ITS CALCULATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S INCOME FOR THE YEARS 2011 THROUGH 2013. A. Barson's …
- njcourts.gov… NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2013-IT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to vacate the final foreclosure judgment and dismiss the complaint. The second order denied defendant's motion to … did before the trial court, defendant argues the following points: Point 1 – Defendant is entitled to relief pursuant …
- A-3253-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued November 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Nugent, Reisner and Mawla. On appeal from … A REMAND ON THE ISSUE OF ALIMONY AND THE DEFENDANT’S INCOME FOR THE YEARS 2011 THROUGH 2013. POINT II: EVEN IF ONE … NEVERTHELESS ERRED IN ITS CALCULATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S INCOME FOR THE YEARS 2011 THROUGH 2013. A. Barson's …
- A-5520-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2013-IT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to vacate the final foreclosure judgment and dismiss the complaint. The second order denied defendant's motion to … did before the trial court, defendant argues the following points: Point 1 – Defendant is entitled to relief pursuant …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5110-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF A PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF MARTIN V. CARLUCCIO. … POINT VI[I] [N.J.S.A.] 2C:52-8 SPECIFIES STATEMENTS TO ACCOMPANY A PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT WHICH REFERENCE … as it was not 'clearly unreasonable in the light of the accompanying and surrounding circumstances[.]'" In re LoBasso, …
- A-5110-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5110-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF A PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF MARTIN V. CARLUCCIO. … POINT VI[I] [N.J.S.A.] 2C:52-8 SPECIFIES STATEMENTS TO ACCOMPANY A PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT WHICH REFERENCE … as it was not 'clearly unreasonable in the light of the accompanying and surrounding circumstances[.]'" In re LoBasso, …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AUBERTO EGIPCIACO (01-04-1277, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 9, 2019 – Decided January 30, 2019 Before Judges Nugent and Mawla. On appeal from Superior Court … 2 A-3746-16T1 In 2003, a jury found defendant guilty of committing the following crimes during a violent home … his sentence in his first, second, 6 A-3746-16T1 and fifth points fail because we have previously considered and …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted January 21, 2021 – Decided April 29, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … SUFFICIENTLY TO OPPOSE THE STATE'S MOTION TO ADMIT FRESH COMPLAINT EVIDENCE. POINT III THIS COURT SHOULD REVERSE THE … OF DILIGENCE. As we have said, we rely on Judge Caulfield's comprehensive decision on the merits of each and every …
- A-4041-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 21, 2021 – Decided April 29, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … SUFFICIENTLY TO OPPOSE THE STATE'S MOTION TO ADMIT FRESH COMPLAINT EVIDENCE. POINT III THIS COURT SHOULD REVERSE THE … OF DILIGENCE. As we have said, we rely on Judge Caulfield's comprehensive decision on the merits of each and every …
- A-3746-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 9, 2019 – Decided January 30, 2019 Before Judges Nugent and Mawla. On appeal from Superior Court … 2 A-3746-16T1 In 2003, a jury found defendant guilty of committing the following crimes during a violent home … his sentence in his first, second, 6 A-3746-16T1 and fifth points fail because we have previously considered and …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FRANK BRIGHT (19-2022, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Argued March 19, 2024 – Decided April 12, 2024 Before Judges Mayer, Paganelli and Whipple. On appeal from the … 27, 2022 municipal court proceeding and made disrespectful comments during that proceeding, the municipal court judge … order , stating the issue was preserved pending the outcome of the municipal court trial. 4 A-2137-22 POINT III …
- njcourts.gov… Argued March 19, 2024 – Decided April 12, 2024 Before Judges Mayer, Paganelli and Whipple. On appeal from the … 27, 2022 municipal court proceeding and made disrespectful comments during that proceeding, the municipal court judge … order , stating the issue was preserved pending the outcome of the municipal court trial. 4 A-2137-22 POINT III …
- njcourts.gov… A-3411-22 Q.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. JUVENILE JUSTICE COMMISSION, Respondent. __________________ Argued December 18, 2024 - Decided January 10, 2025 Before Judges Mayer, Rose and Puglisi. On appeal from the … R. 2:11-3(e)(2). We briefly address the Q.C.'s arguments in Points I, III, and IV. As to Point I, the JJC had …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted January 22, 2025 – Decided February 27, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Firko, and Augostini. On appeal from the … for the reasons explained by Judge John I. Gizzo in his comprehensive fifteen-page written opinion. Accordingly, we … that on November 7, 2014, he was driving home after completing his shift, which ended at approximately 2:00 a.m. …
- njcourts.gov… Argued April 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Lisa. On appeal from Superior Court … defendants' submissions, the Board deemed the applications complete and held public hearings on July 10, 2014, for … filed an appeal (A-4780-15). Plaintiff raises the following points in appeal A-1853-15: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN …
- A-1853-15T4,A-4780-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued April 5, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Lisa. On appeal from Superior Court … defendants' submissions, the Board deemed the applications complete and held public hearings on July 10, 2014, for … filed an appeal (A-4780-15). Plaintiff raises the following points in appeal A-1853-15: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN …
- njcourts.gov… A-3411-22 Q.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. JUVENILE JUSTICE COMMISSION, Respondent. __________________ Argued December 18, 2024 - Decided January 10, 2025 Before Judges Mayer, Rose and Puglisi. On appeal from the … R. 2:11-3(e)(2). We briefly address the Q.C.'s arguments in Points I, III, and IV. As to Point I, the JJC had …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted January 22, 2025 – Decided February 27, 2025 Before Judges Gilson, Firko, and Augostini. On appeal from the … for the reasons explained by Judge John I. Gizzo in his comprehensive fifteen-page written opinion. Accordingly, we … that on November 7, 2014, he was driving home after completing his shift, which ended at approximately 2:00 a.m. …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LOUIS WATLEY (98-01-0099, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… _________________________ Argued May 23, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Reisner and Koblitz. On appeal from the Superior … PCR counsel. On appeal defendant raised the following points:2 POINT I: PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT … the claim lacked merit. We stated that "defendant's complaints about the manner in which the evidentiary hearing …
- A-3220-14T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… _________________________ Argued May 23, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Reisner and Koblitz. On appeal from the Superior … PCR counsel. On appeal defendant raised the following points:2 POINT I: PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING DEFENDANT … the claim lacked merit. We stated that "defendant's complaints about the manner in which the evidentiary hearing …