njcourts.gov
… released at this time." Appellant appealed both panels' decisions to the full Board. On May 31, 2017, the Board … State Parole Bd., 224 N.J. 213, 222-23 (2016). Parole Board decisions are "highly 'individualized discretionary …
njcourts.gov
… 368 N.J. Super. 175, 179 (App. Div. 2004). "Parole Board decisions are highly individualized discretionary … be considered by the Board and Board panel in making parole decisions, including the "[c]ommission of serious … deemed relevant[,]" N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.11(b), and parole decisions "shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent …
-
njcourts.gov
… released at this time." Appellant appealed both panels' decisions to the full Board. On May 31, 2017, the Board … State Parole Bd., 224 N.J. 213, 222-23 (2016). Parole Board decisions are "highly 'individualized discretionary …
-
njcourts.gov
… following comments. "The scope of judicial review of PTI decisions is 'severely limited[,]' and interference by … 178 N.J. 73, 82 (2003)). "[O]n appeal, [we] review[] PTI decisions with 'enhanced deference.'" Ibid. (quoting State …
-
njcourts.gov
… 368 N.J. Super. 175, 179 (App. Div. 2004). "Parole Board decisions are highly individualized discretionary … be considered by the Board and Board panel in making parole decisions, including the "[c]ommission of serious … deemed relevant[,]" N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.11(b), and parole decisions "shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent …
njcourts.gov
… in rates of hiring, promotion and other selection decisions." 29 C.F.R. § 1607 (1979). 6 A-2369-20 remedied … reliance on the discretion ordinarily accorded to agency decisions and the consent decree is misplaced because it …
-
njcourts.gov
… in rates of hiring, promotion and other selection decisions." 29 C.F.R. § 1607 (1979). 6 A-2369-20 remedied … reliance on the discretion ordinarily accorded to agency decisions and the consent decree is misplaced because it …
njcourts.gov
… and standards used in their review of classification decisions. Although we have reversed and remanded, our …
-
njcourts.gov
… and standards used in their review of classification decisions. Although we have reversed and remanded, our …
njcourts.gov
… appellant from challenging subsequent HRIDC or ICC decisions that specifically address his high risk …
njcourts.gov
… State, 186 N.J. 413, 427 (2006)). That deference extends to decisions relating to employee discipline and punishment, …
-
njcourts.gov
… appellant from challenging subsequent HRIDC or ICC decisions that specifically address his high risk …
-
njcourts.gov
… State, 186 N.J. 413, 427 (2006)). That deference extends to decisions relating to employee discipline and punishment, …
njcourts.gov
… of prerogative writs brought under Rule 4:69 to contest decisions by municipal bodies. Although the contexts vary, … apply a presumption of validity to administrative decisions by municipal agencies. See e.g., 62-64 Main St., … 370 N.J. Super. 429, 453 (App. Div. 2004). Municipal decisions under the LRHL enjoy a similar presumption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… of prerogative writs brought under Rule 4:69 to contest decisions by municipal bodies. Although the contexts vary, … apply a presumption of validity to administrative decisions by municipal agencies. See e.g., 62-64 Main St., … 370 N.J. Super. 429, 453 (App. Div. 2004). Municipal decisions under the LRHL enjoy a similar presumption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… of prerogative writs brought under Rule 4:69 to contest decisions by municipal bodies. Although the contexts vary, … apply a presumption of validity to administrative decisions by municipal agencies. See e.g., 62-64 Main St., … 370 N.J. Super. 429, 453 (App. Div. 2004). Municipal decisions under the LRHL enjoy a similar presumption of …
njcourts.gov
… legal premise applies equally to appeals from final agency decisions. See In re Stream Encroachment Permit, 402 N.J. … the evidence on which she had relied in rendering her decisions pursuant to N.J.A.C. 10A:4-9.15(b). But, again, he … DOC's final decision. Andrews argues the hearing officer's decisions were ambiguous and should be modified pursuant to …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1432-23 D.M.,1 on behalf of minor child, C.M., Petitioner-Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, MERCER COUNTY, Respondent-Appellant. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0223-19 JACK AND SARAH CAYRE, Petitioners-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/LAND USE REGULATION, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ NEW JERSEY …
njcourts.gov
… (2018). We give "[w]ide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …