njcourts.gov
… and standards used in their review of classification decisions. Although we have reversed and remanded, our …
-
njcourts.gov
… and standards used in their review of classification decisions. Although we have reversed and remanded, our …
njcourts.gov
… State, 186 N.J. 413, 427 (2006)). That deference extends to decisions relating to employee discipline and punishment, …
njcourts.gov
… appellant from challenging subsequent HRIDC or ICC decisions that specifically address his high risk …
-
njcourts.gov
… appellant from challenging subsequent HRIDC or ICC decisions that specifically address his high risk …
-
njcourts.gov
… State, 186 N.J. 413, 427 (2006)). That deference extends to decisions relating to employee discipline and punishment, …
default
… of prerogative writs brought under Rule 4:69 to contest decisions by municipal bodies. Although the contexts vary, … apply a presumption of validity to administrative decisions by municipal agencies. See e.g., 62-64 Main St., … 370 N.J. Super. 429, 453 (App. Div. 2004). Municipal decisions under the LRHL enjoy a similar presumption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… of prerogative writs brought under Rule 4:69 to contest decisions by municipal bodies. Although the contexts vary, … apply a presumption of validity to administrative decisions by municipal agencies. See e.g., 62-64 Main St., … 370 N.J. Super. 429, 453 (App. Div. 2004). Municipal decisions under the LRHL enjoy a similar presumption of …
-
njcourts.gov
… of prerogative writs brought under Rule 4:69 to contest decisions by municipal bodies. Although the contexts vary, … apply a presumption of validity to administrative decisions by municipal agencies. See e.g., 62-64 Main St., … 370 N.J. Super. 429, 453 (App. Div. 2004). Municipal decisions under the LRHL enjoy a similar presumption of …
njcourts.gov
… . . . [the] Attorney General 6 A-0684-24 . . . and all such decisions are arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable ." … Division is vested with jurisdiction to review final decisions and actions of a State administrative agency or … that an appeal may be taken as of right: "to review final decisions or actions of any [S]tate administrative agency or …
njcourts.gov
… legal premise applies equally to appeals from final agency decisions. See In re Stream Encroachment Permit, 402 N.J. … the evidence on which she had relied in rendering her decisions pursuant to N.J.A.C. 10A:4-9.15(b). But, again, he … DOC's final decision. Andrews argues the hearing officer's decisions were ambiguous and should be modified pursuant to …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0881-16T1 TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CAROL ZIZNEWSKI, Respondent-Appellant. _____________________________ Submitted January 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges …
default
… (2018). We give "[w]ide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0223-19 JACK AND SARAH CAYRE, Petitioners-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/LAND USE REGULATION, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ NEW JERSEY …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1432-23 D.M.,1 on behalf of minor child, C.M., Petitioner-Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, MERCER COUNTY, Respondent-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… (2018). We give "[w]ide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0223-19 JACK AND SARAH CAYRE, Petitioners-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/LAND USE REGULATION, Respondent-Respondent. ___________________________ NEW JERSEY …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0881-16T1 TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CAROL ZIZNEWSKI, Respondent-Appellant. _____________________________ Submitted January 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges …
-
A-28-24 Reply Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… in conflict with the controlling authority and all prior decisions. ................................................. … 20 Sep 2024, 089720 7 Previously, Extech had distorted the decisions in guaranty cases by arguing that some cases had … in conflict with the controlling authority and all prior decisions. As set forth above and in Ferreira’s Petition, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1432-23 D.M.,1 on behalf of minor child, C.M., Petitioner-Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, MERCER COUNTY, Respondent-Appellant. …