-
njcourts.gov
… Cross-Appellant. Argued October 15, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Sumners. On appeal from the Superior … making small short-term loans to citizens in the Lakewood community. The director of GZYD, Jonathan Rubin, testified … below. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE CONVICTIONS SHOULD BE VACATED BECAUSE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 20, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz, Hoffman and Whipple. On appeal from … 2C:43-7.2. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE ADMISSION OF 404(B) … THE INCIDENT IS REVERSIBLE ERROR. POINT TWO THE MISCONDUCT COMMITTED BY THE STATE DURING ITS SUMMATION IS SO FAR BEYOND …
-
A-24-24 Amicus Curiae Brief Seton Hall Law School Center for Social Justice
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… BOARD, Respondent-Respondent. CRIMINAL ACTION On Petition for Certification from: Superior Court of New Jersey … passim Other Authorities Ad Hoc Parole Comm., Public Information Report #1: The Parole Denial … that Cowan is incarcerated for multiple offenses, and points to Cowan’s prior placement on juvenile probation and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 7, 2025 – Decided July 28, 2025 Before Judges Currier, Marczyk, and Torregrossa- O'Connor. On … through a hole in his sweatpants . C.W. stated it felt "uncomfortable." Defendant told C.W. that he loved her more 7 … also subject to NERA. II. Defendant raises the following points in his counselled brief: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT'S …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 8, 2025 – Decided March 4, 2025 Before Judges Rose, DeAlmeida and Puglisi. On appeal from the … his counseled merits brief, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: 1 State v. Reyes, 50 N.J. 454 (1967). 3 A-0565-22 POINT I THE JUDGE COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN HE DENIED . . . DEFENDANT'S …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 20, 2024 – Decided May 28, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Marczyk, and Vinci. On appeal from the … challenges his sentence. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I - THE CONVICTION MUST BE REVERSED … 1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 4 A-2094-22 not comply with the Supreme Court's holding in State v. Tillery, …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 5, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Whipple and Firko. On appeal from the … IN DENYING THE MISTRIAL MOTION BECAUSE OFFICER WILSON'S COMMENT THAT [W.B.] WAS RECENTLY IN JAIL WAS SO PREJUDICIAL … arguments and the record presented, we determined points two and three lack sufficient merit to warrant …
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 20, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Koblitz and Manahan. On appeal from … Price appeals from an August 17, 2016 order dismissing his complaint in lieu of prerogative writs seeking to invalidate … the area as a redevelopment area so that it could become a "gatekeeper" and control the development of the area, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 5, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Whipple and Firko. On appeal from the … IN DENYING THE MISTRIAL MOTION BECAUSE OFFICER WILSON'S COMMENT THAT [W.B.] WAS RECENTLY IN JAIL WAS SO PREJUDICIAL … arguments and the record presented, we determined points two and three lack sufficient merit to warrant …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued December 20, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Koblitz and Manahan. On appeal from … Price appeals from an August 17, 2016 order dismissing his complaint in lieu of prerogative writs seeking to invalidate … the area as a redevelopment area so that it could become a "gatekeeper" and control the development of the area, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 20, 2024 – Decided May 28, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Marczyk, and Vinci. On appeal from the … challenges his sentence. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I - THE CONVICTION MUST BE REVERSED … 1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 4 A-2094-22 not comply with the Supreme Court's holding in State v. Tillery, …
njcourts.gov
… Argued April 26, 2023 – Decided July 7, 2023 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia, and Firko. On appeal from the … to remand this matter for resentencing pursuant to State v. Comer, 249 N.J. 359 (2022), because he was eighteen years … pro se brief, defendant raises the following additional points: POINT ONE (A) THE COURT BELOW ABUSED ITS DISCRETION …
njcourts.gov
… motion for summary judgment, and dismissing plaintiffs' complaint for breach of contract. We affirm. We begin by … Because the order is interlocutory, the trial court may revisit it at any time, in the interests of justice, prior to … merely repetitive of their assertions in their first three points. These contentions continue to lack merit. R. …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 27, 2019 – Decided May 2, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz, Currier and Mayer. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … March 3, 2017 and June 9, 2017 orders dismissing their complaint against Kean University (Kean) and its employees. … semester. On April 17, 2015, plaintiffs filed an initial complaint against Kean and various employees, alleging …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 19, 2019 – Decided August 23, 2019 Before Judges Rothstadt and Gilson. On appeal from the … defendant retired on October 2, 2014, and plaintiff filed a Complaint for Divorce on December 28, 2015. In October 2016, … using a percentage that was based upon a ratio of military points2 earned during the marriage to the total points …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 21, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia, and Enright. On appeal from … Coleman were walking out of the Garden Spires Housing Complex in Newark, where Grant and his family lived. As the … A-5069-17T4 hero and referencing Grant's family. Defendant points to the prosecutor's comment that defendant "brought …
njcourts.gov
… Argued May 3, 2021 – Decided July 6, 2021 Before Judges Hoffman and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … court found defendant in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders to – among other things – pay fifty … having a value of $360,000 when plaintiff filed her divorce complaint, had an the actual value of $450,000 at that time. …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 10, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano, Fasciale and Rose. On appeal from … and the victim at the party. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I THE TRIAL [JUDGE]'S COERCIVE … a substantial effort . . . ." He continued, "[i]f they come back again, and in my determination at that point …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 19, 2019 – Decided August 23, 2019 Before Judges Rothstadt and Gilson. On appeal from the … defendant retired on October 2, 2014, and plaintiff filed a Complaint for Divorce on December 28, 2015. In October 2016, … using a percentage that was based upon a ratio of military points2 earned during the marriage to the total points …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 21, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia, and Enright. On appeal from … Coleman were walking out of the Garden Spires Housing Complex in Newark, where Grant and his family lived. As the … A-5069-17T4 hero and referencing Grant's family. Defendant points to the prosecutor's comment that defendant "brought …