-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1923-17T1 CEDAR GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JEROME BRANHAM, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ Submitted December 18, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and …
-
njcourts.gov
… undefined. We disagree. Our review of administrative agency decisions is limited. We will not disturb an agency's action …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2721-17T1 WILLIAM STRIKER, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. ____________________________ Submitted February 25, 2019 – Decided March 7, 2019 Before Judges Sabatino …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4534-16T3 L.B., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondents-Respondents. _______________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1597-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.J., Defendant-Appellant, and D.T., Defendant. ________________________________ IN …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3496-20 HUI XIE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STANLEY X. WANG, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted December 7, 2022 – Decided December 15, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0702-24 CHRIS G. ALEVRAS, d/b/a CGA ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILSON BREWSTER, JR., as Executor of the Estate of THOMAS R. ASHLEY,1 Defendant-Respondent. __________________________ …
njcourts.gov
… to “conclusions of law made by lower courts in suppression decisions,” which are reviewed de novo. State v. Boone, 232 …
njcourts.gov
… 2019. 8 including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or … to establish “a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
… at 382. F. In Summary. We affirm the chancery court's decisions, which were supported by substantial credible … abuse of discretion in the chancery court's reconsideration decisions. Affirmed. … LAWRENCE B. SEIDMAN, ET AL. VS. …
njcourts.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3775-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN C. VANNESS, a/k/a JOHN C. VAN NESS, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1017-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUCIA MANZANO, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Submitted November 9, 2023 – Decided November 29, 2023 Before …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant reserved the right to appeal three trial court decisions made before his plea: (1) a December 21, 2020 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3203-22 S.M.A., Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, v. E.M.,1 Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant. Submitted September 24, 2024 – Decided October 29, 2024 Before Judges Susswein and …
default
… 474, 483-84 (1974). We likewise defer to the Family Part on decisions that are committed to the trial court's exercise …
default
… taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion." … We also reject AC Souvenir's contention that the prior decisions denying defendants' motions for summary judgment …
njcourts.gov
… by professional engineers. Relying on the Court's earlier decisions in Armstrong v. Francis Corp., 20 N.J. 320, 327-30 …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2659-15T4 HAUL ROAD HOLDINGS, INC., and POLYMERIC RESOURCES CORP., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE, Defendant-Respondent. ____________________________ Argued telephonically October …
njcourts.gov
… to conclusions of law made by lower courts in suppression decisions, which we instead review de novo." State v. Boone, …
njcourts.gov
… that she could provide for the child. Plainly, the judge's decisions were made not to harm plaintiff, but to ensure …