-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 23, 2026 – Decided March 9, 2026 Before Judges Natali and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the … 25th order because the court's findings that defendant committed assault and that plaintiff needed a final … incident plaintiff was arrested but the charges dropped, as best we can discern, upon defendant's request and his …
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 6, 2023 – Decided February 10, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … for the reasons set forth by the trial judge in her comprehensive written decision rendered on September 15, … of defendants' parental rights was in the child's best interests, and fully explained the basis for each of …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 10, 2023 – Decided July 14, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … in the trial court's decision. We add the following brief comments. The guardianship petition was tried before the … termination of defendant's parental rights was in C.M.M.L's best interests, and fully explained the basis for each of …
default
… Submitted October 2, 2018 – Decided October 15, 2018 Before Judges Suter, Geiger and Firko. On appeal from Superior … for the reasons set forth in Judge Jeffrey J. Waldman's comprehensive forty-four page written decision. We add only … that: (1) the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interest test by clear and convincing evidence, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 23, 2018 — Decided June 15, 2018 Before Judges Koblitz, Manahan, Suter. On appeal from Superior … or a habitable home for the older children. Although she completed parenting classes in 2014, she was unable to … found the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that …
default
… Submitted March 11, 2019 – Decided March 25, 2019 Before Judges Fasciale and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE MODIFICATION WAS IN THE CHILDREN'S BEST INTERESTS. POINT III ALTERNATIVELY, THE [JUDGE] ERRED … had requested as part of her emergent motion (such as, the completion of a Divison investigation, evaluations, review …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … for the reasons set forth in Judge Francine Axelrad's comprehensive and well-reasoned decision issued with the … judge found the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:40C-15.1(a), which, in the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 13, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … for the reasons set forth in Judge Kimarie Rahill's comprehensive and well- reasoned seventeen-page written … judge found the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:40C-15.1(a), which, in the …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 20, 2020 – Decided June 8, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz, Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from … was unpersuaded by the lone expert conditionally recommending reunification. R.O. did not present a plan to … found that the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that …
default
… Submitted September 23, 2021 – Decided October 5, 2021 Before Judges Haas and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … contained in Judge Katz's decision. We add the following comments. The Division removed Kevin from defendants' … that (1) the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … for the reasons set forth in Judge Francine Axelrad's comprehensive and well-reasoned decision issued with the … judge found the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:40C-15.1(a), which, in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 20, 2020 – Decided June 8, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz, Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from … was unpersuaded by the lone expert conditionally recommending reunification. R.O. did not present a plan to … found that the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 11, 2019 – Decided March 25, 2019 Before Judges Fasciale and Gooden Brown. On appeal from … TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE MODIFICATION WAS IN THE CHILDREN'S BEST INTERESTS. POINT III ALTERNATIVELY, THE [JUDGE] ERRED … had requested as part of her emergent motion (such as, the completion of a Divison investigation, evaluations, review …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 23, 2021 – Decided October 5, 2021 Before Judges Haas and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior … contained in Judge Katz's decision. We add the following comments. The Division removed Kevin from defendants' … that (1) the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test by clear and convincing evidence, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 2, 2018 – Decided October 15, 2018 Before Judges Suter, Geiger and Firko. On appeal from Superior … for the reasons set forth in Judge Jeffrey J. Waldman's comprehensive forty-four page written decision. We add only … that: (1) the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interest test by clear and convincing evidence, …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 23, 2018 — Decided June 15, 2018 Before Judges Koblitz, Manahan, Suter. On appeal from Superior … or a habitable home for the older children. Although she completed parenting classes in 2014, she was unable to … found the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and that …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 13, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Manahan and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court … for the reasons set forth in Judge Kimarie Rahill's comprehensive and well- reasoned seventeen-page written … judge found the Division had proven all four prongs of the best interests test, N.J.S.A. 30:40C-15.1(a), which, in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 6, 2023 – Decided February 10, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … for the reasons set forth by the trial judge in her comprehensive written decision rendered on September 15, … of defendants' parental rights was in the child's best interests, and fully explained the basis for each of …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2025) Amendment #1 The following constitutes Amendment #1 for the above referenced bid: Answers to questions … Sales Manager will be able to get you in contact with. All communication regarding employee lists will need to be … diem pricing for guestrooms and meals? Judiciary prefers best pricing available. 12. Judiciary Price Sheet …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted July 10, 2023 – Decided July 14, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … in the trial court's decision. We add the following brief comments. The guardianship petition was tried before the … termination of defendant's parental rights was in C.M.M.L's best interests, and fully explained the basis for each of …