njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1986-19T2 JOYCE DAMMS g/a/l "S.D." and S.D., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SANTA DAMMS, Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued telephonically March 24, 2020 – Decided April 15, 2020 …
njcourts.gov
… it saw fit. See Brown, 62 N.J. at 10-11 (noting that policy decisions rest with the Legislature and that a statute's …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0858-18T2 JSTAR, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRICK TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, and RTS IV, LLC, a/k/a JOSEPH R. PRESTIFILIPPO, JR., Defendants-Respondents. …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3261-19 CENTRO INSPECTION AGENCY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JAMES JAROSCHAK, JENNIFER JAROSCHAK, and VERITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendants-Respondents, and MARLENE KLEIN and PETER DAUS, …
default
… well explained by the municipal court judge in his written decisions both before and after remand, are well supported …
default
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3931-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. W.L., Defendant-Appellant. ___________________________ Submitted September 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Messano and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5233-17T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KARON D. TOWNES, a/k/a PRINCE TOWNES, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted October 29, 2019 – Decided Before …
njcourts.gov
… denying its motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment decisions are reviewed de novo, applying the same standard …
default
… 369, 384-85 (2010)). "Appellate review of the trial court's decisions proceeds in the same sequence, with the …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3192-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WILLIAM E. VALLOREO, a/k/a WILLIAM VALLOREO, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Submitted March 28, 2022 – Decided April 13, …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4441-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF A.P. _________________________ Submitted May 12, 2021 – Decided June 7, 2021 Before Judges Alvarez and Geiger. On appeal from …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4206-19 CALVIN M. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY COOK, SHEILAH COLEY and PHYLLIS BINDI, Defendants-Respondents. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1553-19T4 STATE IN THE INTEREST OF A.D., a Juvenile. Submitted April 28, 2020 – Decided June 16, 2020 Before Judges Yannotti and Currier. On appeal from the Superior Court of …
default
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2908-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DORIAN J. ROBERTS, a/k/a DORIAN ROBERTS, and DORIAN JAY ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted September 30, 2025 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2912-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAMON D. RUIZ-PEREZ, a/k/a RAMON PEREZ, PEREZ RAMON, RAMIN RUIZPEREZ, RAMON RUIZ-PEREZ, RAMON RUIZ, RAMON D. PEREZ and RAMON D. RUIZ, …
njcourts.gov
… to counterclaims and to third-party claims. However, our decisions addressing the issue generally agree that such … to disconnecting the sewer line himself. See Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenico, 236 N.J. Super. 388, 396 …
njcourts.gov
… the motion without prejudice, reserving admissibility decisions for trial. The court held a bench trial on January …
-
njcourts.gov
… for the reasons stated in her well-reasoned written decisions. Because we conclude the judge's factual and …