-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2919-22 TANIA BARONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AAA INSURANCE and/or CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and A PLUS … against A Plus, plaintiff argues her "contract claim should have survived summary judgment" because A Plus "assumed …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3471-21 DAVID GOYCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … except those provisions which by their very nature may have no application to low-speed electric bicycles or …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRIDGEWATER-RARITAN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, NANCY IATESTA, MEGAN … were being made to S.K. such as always allowing S.K. to have her water bottle with her, being given a universal … found there was no evidence of failure to train district employees. The judge noted plaintiffs had no expert and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1380-23 MICHAEL GALATI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. USAA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … modifying[,] or correcting an arbitration award, we have no jurisdiction to tamper with the judge's decision or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2039-22 CONCETTA PEREIRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … Fava, 342 N.J. Super. 38, 45 (App. Div. 2001)). "Plaintiffs have a duty to diligently pursue their claims." Id. at …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3127-22 J. F. and C. F.,1 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT— BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Respondent. … we affirm. I. Plaintiffs, who live in Egg Harbor Township, have one child, who was a minor at the times relevant to …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3551-22 ARELIS GUTIERREZ, … as residents of the property and identified by plaintiff as employees for the business she owns were not listed on the … court rejected plaintiff's argument that the policy should have emphasized the shortened limitations period, stating …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2729-21 DOVAN MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY,1 Defendant-Respondent. … it was entitled to coverage from AmGuard, and Dovan did not have "standing to bring this action for a declaration of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1451-21 ON-TARGET STAFFING, LLC, … cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-1451-21 After four of its employees sued it for injuries they suffered during an … then incongruously found the underlying plaintiffs did not have a cause of action against On-Target because none had …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3045-22 J.S. AND S.S. ON BEHALF OF MINOR … v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE WEST MORRIS REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, MORRIS COUNTY, Respondent-Appellant. … unlike a larger school bus, Cassidy's minivan does not have the capabilities to stop traffic with warning lights. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1407-21 ANTONE'S, A BAR 401, LLC, and D … or the action is taken to enable a civil authority to have unimpeded access to the damaged property. 3 A-1407-21 … business hours of operation, provide take-out, and lay-off employees, the proximate cause of these losses was the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1121-22 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY … Citizen Action, Inc., and Health Professionals and Allied Employees, Inc. (New Jersey Appleseed Public Interest Law … RBC every year and provide quarterly estimates, HMH would have to satisfy shortfalls within thirty days of the annual …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1566-21 TORY BURCH, LLC, … to provide coverage. Personal Property of officers and employees of the Insured. B. EXCLUSIONS The Policies exclude … (3d Cir. 2002), for the proposition that "New Jersey courts have interpreted the physical loss or damage requirement …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3411-21 A-0396-22 PAUL B. DALNOKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE PINELANDS REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Respondent. … on criminal conduct." Plaintiff asserted the students "have no compunction about using their [cell] phones in …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … BRITNEY MOTIL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WAUSAU UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY,1 Defendant-Appellant. … opinion. A-0400-23 4 shown for each type of coverage you have purchased for each vehicle. Where no premium is shown, …
-
njcourts.gov
… for the sole purpose of operating a summer camp for high school boys in Virginia from August 6, to August 26, 2019. … owned by others, including vehicles owned by [Machane's] employees)." On July 9, Alexander contacted Hertz … or [fifteen]-passenger rental vans, FL Dean would not have written [HNOA] coverage for Machane" because "FL Dean …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0962-21 STATE-COMM, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Argued December 5, … consented to the motion to extend. Axis and this court have "a right to know precisely what legal arguments are …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2165-20 SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF … and intend no disrespect by that designation. 2 The parties have sought declaratory relief as to the insurers' … order to create a wedge between BDCMS and the dentists and employees in the dental practices. The parties settled the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0997-21 TONY PING YEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FMI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … "new or additional information . . . which it could not have provided on the first application." Cummings v. Bahr, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3142-21 FRANK BARKOSKY III, a minor by … individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. WEBER'S TRAINING SCHOOL and DAVID A. HOROWITZ, individually, … must be the owner of the dog[;]" (2) "the dog must have bitten the injured party[;]" and (3) the bite must have …