njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2267-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reunification but ultimately filed a complaint seeking termination of T.D.W.'s parental rights, with A.C.W.'s … We will uphold a trial judge's factfindings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2267-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reunification but ultimately filed a complaint seeking termination of T.D.W.'s parental rights, with A.C.W.'s … We will uphold a trial judge's factfindings if they are "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. FA-000010-20 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A MINOR CHILD BY J.B. Decided: March 11, 2020 Rebecca Jaffe, for … but these answers are nonetheless critical to the court’s determination. Introduction On September 19, 2019, petitioner, … on things she normally doesn’t and that she was incredibly supportive. Even prior to the pregnancy, the couple’s …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3263-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … suffer if she was separated from her mother, Dr. Kirschner supported the Division's attempts to find an adoptive … the impact of harm to these children in the event of termination of parental rights so as to not be serious and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3263-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … suffer if she was separated from her mother, Dr. Kirschner supported the Division's attempts to find an adoptive … the impact of harm to these children in the event of termination of parental rights so as to not be serious and …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2976-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of 1 We employ initials and pseudonyms to … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2976-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (Division) proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of 1 We employ initials and pseudonyms to … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0587-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights of the biological father, J.J. (Father). The termination of his rights is not at issue in this appeal. 3 … (2002). Our task is to determine whether the decision "is supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" on the …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0587-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … rights of the biological father, J.J. (Father). The termination of his rights is not at issue in this appeal. 3 … (2002). Our task is to determine whether the decision "is supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" on the …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4514-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2 S.D. (Sam), George's father, did not appeal the termination of his parental rights. 3 A-4514-19 I. Defendant … to parent at a minimal level of capacity without Sam. He supported reunification with defendant even if that took …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4514-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 2 S.D. (Sam), George's father, did not appeal the termination of his parental rights. 3 A-4514-19 I. Defendant … to parent at a minimal level of capacity without Sam. He supported reunification with defendant even if that took …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1687-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … lifetime. Defendant has not provided [K.M.K.] with child support. 8. Defendant is remarkably inconsistent in his … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1687-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … lifetime. Defendant has not provided [K.M.K.] with child support. 8. Defendant is remarkably inconsistent in his … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1299-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Law Guardian there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of Sarah's parental rights is …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1299-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Law Guardian there is substantial credible evidence supporting the court's determination that termination of Sarah's parental rights is …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3446-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination of parental rights. We affirm, substantially for …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3446-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination of parental rights. We affirm, substantially for …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5167-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … assistance, preferring to rely on her boyfriend J.W. to support her, even though J.W. would regularly kick J.A.R. … those efforts. With respect to prong four, the judge found termination would not do more harm than good. Dr. Lee found …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5167-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … assistance, preferring to rely on her boyfriend J.W. to support her, even though J.W. would regularly kick J.A.R. … those efforts. With respect to prong four, the judge found termination would not do more harm than good. Dr. Lee found …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-1820-18T2 A-1821-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … emphasizing the Division failed to consider alternatives to termination. John's law guardian joins the Division in … the evidence in favor of the guardianship petition supports the termination of defendants' parental rights. See …