-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0833-16T2 JOHN C. STOLLSTEIMER and CHERYL R. STOLLSTEIMER, h/w, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP. d/b/a FOULKE MANAGEMENT …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2529-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONALD RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________________ Submitted February 13, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4456-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PRTOECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.C., Defendant-Appellant, and D.C., Defendant. __________________________________ IN …
-
njcourts.gov
FILED AUG 23 2019 IN RE: ZOSTA VAX® LITIGATION Judge James F. Hyland SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY CASENO. 629 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #5 August 6, 2019 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THIS MATTER, having come before the Court at a …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5648-16T1 MORRIS VIEW HEALTHCARE CENTER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF AGING SERVICES, Respondent. _____________________________ Argued February 4, 2019 – Decided March …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1881-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. K.F., Defendant-Appellant. ——————————————— IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF KA.F., …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4064-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. K.E., Defendant-Appellant, and C.L.L., Defendant. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4500-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF ELIZABETH, Petitioner-Respondent, and ELIZABETH SUPERIOR OFFICERS ASSOCIATION and PBA LOCAL 4, Respondents-Appellants. ________________________________ …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3304-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LAWRENCE E. PIPPINS, a/k/a LONNIE E. PIPPINS, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted September 25, 2025 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0512-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JENNIE S. CULLUM, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted November 19, 2024 – Decided January 8, 2025 Before Judges …
-
#11-03
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… in the litigation, that is, even the simplest of decisions may be required to pass through layers of local, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1930-21 ROBERT J. TRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARDEN STATE PAIN CONTROL CENTER, P.A., (SUCC. IN INT. TO) GARDEN STATE ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, P.A., Defendant-Respondent, and GULVIANA ORTEGA, …
-
A-71-24 Respondent Response to Amicus Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Court, it is respectfully requested that the well reasoned decisions of the Appellate Division and the Law Division be …
-
njcourts.gov
… care provider's opinions and statements are not official VA decisions regarding whether I will receive other VA benefits … may, however, be considered with other evidence when these decisions are made at a VA Regional Office that specializes in benefit decisions. EXPIRATION: Without my express revocation, the …
-
#16-64
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Reporting Petitions for Post-Conviction Relief as Reserved Decisions Directive #16-64 December 28, 1964 Issued by: …
njcourts.gov
… this time, the court noted plaintiff made several financial decisions that impacted his ability to pay alimony. On April … Therefore, we review a trial court's "[e]videntiary decisions . . . under [an] abuse of discretion standard." …
njcourts.gov
… in counsel’s favor. Review of trial counsel’s strategic decisions regarding which witnesses to call to the stand … must overcome the presumption that” the attorney’s decisions followed a sound strategic approach to the case. … to call to the stand is one of the most difficult strategic decisions that any trial attorney must confront.” State v. …
njcourts.gov
… reasoning, the appellate panel cited case law, including decisions from this Court, that had found general statutes … In its reasoning, the panel cited case law, including decisions from this Court, that had found general statutes … a specific limitation period. The panel also noted that decisions of the United States District Court for the …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-1705-20 A-2179-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARCAL N. CAMPBELL, a/k/a MARCAL CAMPBELL, MARCEL N. CAMPBELL, and CALDIGGIE N. CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. …
njcourts.gov
… in the amount $2,000 in 1996. Due to a number of court decisions4 and the enactment of the Agent Orange Act of … meaning. The term “widow” has been defined by judicial decisions as “a woman who has lost her husband by death and … other states reveals that there are a substantial number of decisions in support of Plaintiff’s interpretation of the …