Filters
- njcourts.gov… Argued March 6, 2019 – Decided March 27, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes, Vernoia and Moynihan. NOT FOR … Place Condominium Association (Wyndham) dismissing the complaint against defendants without prejudice.1 Plaintiffs … record on appeal. 6 A-4083-17T3 temperature dropped below freezing, the drained water froze on the sidewalk. …
- njcourts.gov… their May 25, 2017 Final Judgment of Divorce. The MSA is a comprehensive document. We mention only the sections that … Section 5.1 lists certain assets defendant retains "free and clear of any interest" by plaintiff. Among other … assets. She argues the judge should not be able to revisit one of the assets to place it under section 5.1 …
- njcourts.gov… Argued May 24, 2018 – Decided June 8, 2018 Before Judges Haas and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … 416 (App. Div. 2011) (stating that an appellate court is "free to affirm the trial court's decision on grounds … of a street because there had been "several citizen complaints of narcotics activity in that area[.]" At …
- A-4083-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued March 6, 2019 – Decided March 27, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes, Vernoia and Moynihan. NOT FOR … Place Condominium Association (Wyndham) dismissing the complaint against defendants without prejudice.1 Plaintiffs … record on appeal. 6 A-4083-17T3 temperature dropped below freezing, the drained water froze on the sidewalk. …
- A-0523-19T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… their May 25, 2017 Final Judgment of Divorce. The MSA is a comprehensive document. We mention only the sections that … Section 5.1 lists certain assets defendant retains "free and clear of any interest" by plaintiff. Among other … assets. She argues the judge should not be able to revisit one of the assets to place it under section 5.1 …
- A-3531-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued May 24, 2018 – Decided June 8, 2018 Before Judges Haas and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … 416 (App. Div. 2011) (stating that an appellate court is "free to affirm the trial court's decision on grounds … of a street because there had been "several citizen complaints of narcotics activity in that area[.]" At …
- njcourts.gov… Argued March 19, 2024 – Decided April 30, 2024 Before Judges Paganelli and Whipple. On appeal from the … 2020, Sue asked Nick to move out of their residence—he complied, and the child remained with Sue. 3 A-3072-22 In … surnames we apply the best-interests-of-the-child standard free of gender-based notions of parental rights." Id. at …
- Memorial Service Remarks for Associate Justice Albert E. Burling Museum Documentnjcourts.gov… PROCEEDlN• ... GS BEFORE THE Supreme Court of New· J ers_ey . . . IN MEMORY OF … and by the State of New Jersey moved us to appoint a committee of distinguished members of the bar to prepare and … that his"- • former students and their associates felt free to seek his. advice and counsel in the early days of …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted December 5, 2023 – Decided January 18, 2024 Before Judges Whipple and Paganelli. On appeal from the … The Board heard testimony on behalf of Vista, public comment, and objection from Schorr. After Vista's … Rule 4:29-1. The motion judge noted Schorr "remain[ed] free to bring an action against each project separately[ and …
- njcourts.gov… Argued January 8, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Haas and Enright. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … contained in Judge D'Arcy's decision. We add the following comments. Shortly after Jen's birth, the Division conducted … substance abuse evaluation, parenting classes, therapeutic visitation, and family preservation services, to assist them …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted January 23, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Mayer and Enright. On appeal from the New Jersey … sale, or intent to distribute or sell, an electronic communication device, equipment, or peripheral that is … days loss of commutation time, permanent loss of contact visits, 60 days' loss of phone privileges and 30 days loss …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted May 13, 2020 – Decided July 2, 2021 Before Judges Fuentes and Enright. On appeal from the New … appeals from the decision of a Hearing Officer who found he committed a disciplinary infraction, to wit prohibited act … days loss of commutation time, permanent loss of contact visits, 365 days of urine monitoring, referral for a mental …
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARCELLUS BARNES (12-12-2067, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Submitted September 28, 2021 – Decided October 22, 2021 Before Judges Fisher and Currier. On appeal from the Superior … in the PCR judge's opinion, adding only the following comments. To establish a prima facie case of ineffective … Similarly, defendant does not explain how an in-person visit by trial counsel to the apartment where the drugs were …
- J.T.S. VS. J.S. (FV-02-2004-21, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… Argued July 11, 2022 – Decided August 2, 2022 Before Judges Currier and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … DEFENDANT: Unfortunately we will need to cancel today's visit. I will be in touch with [the Director of Supervisor … plaintiff to explain his allegations and to discuss past communications from defendant and her counsel which …
- njcourts.gov › notices to the bar… NOTICE TO THE BAR CONFIDENTIAL LITIGANT INFORMATION SHEET (CN 10486) REQUIRED TO BE FILED IN ALL … the CLIS as a required filing with all initial FM or FD complaints and all responses to an initial FM or FD … alimony, spousal or child support, custody, parenting time (visitation) or paternity. If something does not apply to …
- Directive #02-22 – Family – Revised Standard Protective Order (Supersedes Directive #18-21) Administrative Directivesnjcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives… Director of the Courts Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex• P.O. Box 037 • Trenton, NJ 08625-0037 njcourts.gov … release of records and concludes that records authorized for release should not be disclosed to others. The revisions … Records obtained in contested custody, parenting time, and visitation matters filed in the dissolution and …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted May 30, 2018 – Decided July 10, 2018 Before Judges Fisher and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … to termination when defendant was dismissed from three visitation programs offered by the Division due to her … the order. We disagree. Our review of the Judge Chell's comprehensive decision is limited. We defer to his expertise …
- njcourts.gov… Submitted October 19, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Rothstadt. On appeal from Superior … Subutex during her pregnancy. As a result, the Division commenced the FN matter and, following a hearing, the trial … of an order regarding custody and related matters such as visitation, which[, as here] supersedes any orders entered …
- njcourts.gov… Argued September 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … his child support for his son who attends a county community college and requiring him to contribute to the … living with plaintiff and was no longer having overnight visits with defendant, defendant's obligation to pay child …
- njcourts.gov… terrier, Chancellor, to defendants' property for a social visit. Chancellor and Molly, defendants' sixty-pound … were negligent in allowing their sixty-pound dog to run freely on their property in the presence of guests and … In Jannuzzelli, we explained that absent such a dog bite, a common law cause of action for absolute liability is …