-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4036-18T3 KEVIN MALANGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE PLANNING BOARD, and TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE TOWNSHIP COUNCIL, Defendants-Respondents, and WEST …
-
njcourts.gov
… who addressed Farina's claims in their written and oral decisions that accompanied the orders under appeal. The … and Judge Mongiardo in their thorough written and oral decisions. We add only the following comments. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… any law." This appeal followed. We review summary judgment decisions de novo using the same standard governing the …
-
njcourts.gov
… standard of review of the trial judge's evidentiary decisions, State v. Cole, 229 N.J. 430, 449 (2017), we …
-
njcourts.gov
… taken from orders and judgments and not from opinions, oral decisions, informal written decisions, or reasons given for the ultimate conclusion." …
-
njcourts.gov
… made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0404-17T1 S.H., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.H., Defendant-Respondent. Submitted January 8, 2019 – Decided May 20, 2019 Before Judges Accurso and Moynihan. On appeal from Superior Court of New …
-
njcourts.gov
… is only to point out 'the matters or controlling decisions which [a party] believes the court has overlooked …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3364-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J.B.D., Jr., Defendant-Appellant, and J.N.M., Defendant. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3218-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL CASSELLA, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________ Argued September 28, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli, Haas …
-
njcourts.gov
… v. Ates, 217 N.J. 253, 269 (2014) (considering federal decisions that interpret 16 federal wiretap statute when …
-
njcourts.gov
… and where’s there [is] [c]ourt oversight over the placement decisions made by [the Division]. The court stated, however, … arguments. III. We accord "great deference to discretionary decisions of Family Part judges[,]" Milne v. Goldenberg, 428 …
-
A-33-23 Amicus Curiae Brief Partners for Women and Justice
Briefs
njcourts.gov
ANTONIO FUSTER and BRIANNA DEVINE, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM and GREGORY LaCONTE, in his official capacity as records custodian, Defendants-Respondents. SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO.: 089030 Civil Action On Petition for …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1512-22 MARCI L. SPIRO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SCOTT M. SPIRO, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted September 18, 2024 – Decided October 18, 2024 Before Judges Currier and …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3136-23 K.M., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. G.M., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Argued September 22, 2025 – Decided October 7, 2025 Before Judges Sabatino and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0888-23 ROBERT BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JENNIFER WEBB-MCRAE, HAROLD SHAPIRO, RICHARD NECELIS, and RONALD CUFF, individually and in their official capacities, and CUMBERLAND COUNTY, a New …
-
A-46-24 Zazzali PC Amicus Curiae Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… New Jersey Courts will be required to overturn errant decisions – and they will do so. FILED, Clerk of the Supreme …
-
njcourts.gov
… "We use a deferential standard of review for governmental decisions in bidding cases." Id. at 263. "The standard of …
-
A-16-24 Respondent Brief Letter
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… facts of a case, does not present a conflict amongjudicial decisions requiring clarification or calling for supervision …
-
njcourts.gov
… contract claims could not survive in the face of these decisions and express language of the MSRA. Plaintiffs could … Although plaintiffs were correct that unpublished decisions are not binding, citing Sauter v. Colts Neck … not viable because the City's action was based on fiscal decisions made by the director to remedy the City's …