-
njcourts.gov
… decision involves the intersection of two of the latest decisions of the New Jersey Supreme Court dealing with … Solutions. To summarize, the three aforementioned decisions of the Supreme Court require the court to examine … not automatically confer an exemption from property tax. Decisions span back over 100 years in which the subterfuge …
-
njcourts.gov
… record and applicable law, we discern no error in the decisions concerning alimony and attorney's fees. We reverse …
-
njcourts.gov
… governing body has no authority over routine personnel decisions, including hiring, discipline, and termination. …
-
njcourts.gov
… class. Defendants have demonstrated that the disciplinary decisions made regarding . . . [p]laintiff were made with …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0472-17T1 ELIZABETH SOWELL-ZAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARY ZAK, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ Argued March 6, 2019 – Decided April 8, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes, Vernoia …
-
njcourts.gov
… in every disciplinary setting. To the contrary, judicial decisions have recognized that progressive discipline is not …
-
njcourts.gov
… the motion judge did not analyze this factor in any of his decisions, we are able to glean certain dates from the …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2047-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL WING, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________ Submitted March 17, 2021 – Decided June 1, 2021 Before Judges …
-
njcourts.gov
… defendants argue plaintiffs misconstrue the court's decisions and their own causes of action, asserting the … neither plaintiffs' complaint nor the trial court's written decisions are paragons of clarity or precision, as … applied its stated reasons for its summary-judgment decisions (the TCA 14 A-1040-19 and statute of limitations) …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2884-19 K.W.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.W., Defendant-Respondent. _________________________ Argued July 27, 2021 – Decided August 17, 2021 Before Judges Sumners and Firko. On appeal from the …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0531-18T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONALD B. LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Submitted October 18, 2019 – Decided January 6, 2020 Before Judges Ostrer …
-
njcourts.gov
… decision involves the intersection of two of the latest decisions of the New Jersey Supreme Court dealing with … Solutions. To summarize, the three aforementioned decisions of the Supreme Court require the court to examine … not automatically confer an exemption from property tax. Decisions span back over 100 years in which the subterfuge …
-
njcourts.gov
… orders and judgments" and not a court's oral or written decisions), and the judge clearly 18 A-3506-21 determined …
-
A-36-24 Amicus Curiae Brief Scarinici Hollenbeck
Briefs
njcourts.gov
RUSSELL HORNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPPER FREEHOLD REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION, D/B/A UPPER FREEHOLD REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND ALLENTOWN HIGH SCHOOL, Defendants-Respondents, and NEW JERSEY FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA, Defendant, and ALLENTOWN FUTURE …
-
A-67-24 Respondent Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… as previously discussed. As such the lower court’s decisions should stand. FILED, Clerk of the Supreme Court, …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1613-24 ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW BRUNSWICK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK HOUSING AUTHORITY, NEW BRUNSWICK PLANNING BOARD and NB PLAZA OWNER …
-
A-1436-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… or violation of policies, agreements, and administrative decisions ... affecting them.’” Troy v. Rutgers, 168 N.J. …
-
njcourts.gov
… by "prevailing professional norms." Id. at 687-88. Tactical decisions, such as those related to trial strategy, will not …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1923-20 MARYANNE CENNI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, DEIRDRE S. BARBER, CT, CYNTHIA B. OUELLETTE, CT, JAN M. FRIES, CT, GMT, CT (ASCP), and MDC, CT (ASCP), …
-
njcourts.gov
… by "prevailing professional norms." Id. at 687-88. Tactical decisions, such as those related to trial strategy, will not …