njcourts.gov
… of his motion to terminate or modify alimony and modify child support based on job loss and consequent NOT FOR PUBLICATION … and 45% to defendant. In November 2023, plaintiff moved for termination or, in the alternative, reduction of alimony and …
-
njcourts.gov
… of his motion to terminate or modify alimony and modify child support based on job loss and consequent NOT FOR PUBLICATION … and 45% to defendant. In November 2023, plaintiff moved for termination or, in the alternative, reduction of alimony and …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4967-14T4 A-4968-14T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for the remainder of the trial." The judge found "no support" for Father's claim "that he made a request for the … courts should defer to the trial court's credibility determinations." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. R.G., …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NOS. A-4967-14T4 A-4968-14T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for the remainder of the trial." The judge found "no support" for Father's claim "that he made a request for the … courts should defer to the trial court's credibility determinations." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. R.G., …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2698-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … harm her or A.G. The results of the evaluation clinically supported that Jesse had been sexually abused, physically … part of this prong, as there are no alternatives to the termination of . . . [J.G.'s] parental rights. . . . [I]t is …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2698-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … harm her or A.G. The results of the evaluation clinically supported that Jesse had been sexually abused, physically … part of this prong, as there are no alternatives to the termination of . . . [J.G.'s] parental rights. . . . [I]t is …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5437-14T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … with clear and convincing evidence the criteria for termination of his parental rights. We reject these … challenge the Division's evidence. The record does not support these claims. The record shows that defense counsel …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Guardian joins the Division in opposing the appeal. Heather supported termination in her trial testimony. Richard is neither …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4777-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Guardian joins the Division in opposing the appeal. Heather supported termination in her trial testimony. Richard is neither …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2488-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reasonable efforts to help and the court's consideration of termination alternatives, the judge noted "the Division … IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED DID NOT SUPPORT THE LOWER COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT DENNIS'[S] SAFETY, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2488-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reasonable efforts to help and the court's consideration of termination alternatives, the judge noted "the Division … IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED DID NOT SUPPORT THE LOWER COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT DENNIS'[S] SAFETY, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2763-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports its findings, we affirm. 1 We employ initials and … prongs of the best interests test 9 A-2763-22 warranting termination of his parental rights. The Law Guardian sides …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2763-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports its findings, we affirm. 1 We employ initials and … prongs of the best interests test 9 A-2763-22 warranting termination of his parental rights. The Law Guardian sides …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4234-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … because there was not clear and convincing evidence to support the court's findings. We reject her arguments and … to make reasonable efforts. The court could not find that "termination of parental rights will not do more harm than …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4130-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [the Division] Failed to Present Sufficient Evidence to Support the Trial Court's Conclusion that the Division … with [D.C.]. D. The Trial Court's Conclusion that the Termination of Parental Rights Would Not Do More Harm than …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4234-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … because there was not clear and convincing evidence to support the court's findings. We reject her arguments and … to make reasonable efforts. The court could not find that "termination of parental rights will not do more harm than …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4130-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … [the Division] Failed to Present Sufficient Evidence to Support the Trial Court's Conclusion that the Division … with [D.C.]. D. The Trial Court's Conclusion that the Termination of Parental Rights Would Not Do More Harm than …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2287-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that proceeding, the court approved the Division's plan for termination of 7 A-2287-18T1 parental rights followed by … first point, because all of the trial judge's findings were supported by evidence the judge found to be clear, …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2287-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that proceeding, the court approved the Division's plan for termination of 7 A-2287-18T1 parental rights followed by … first point, because all of the trial judge's findings were supported by evidence the judge found to be clear, …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3971-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … on the four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a) to warrant the termination of her parental rights to Mary. We disagree and … to no progress" shown by Joan in treating the problem supported his findings on the first two prongs and favored …