Filters
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3029-22 BASF CATALYSTS, LLC, f/k/a … Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross- Respondent, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor-in-interest to NORTHBROOK … addition, the soil and sediments at the Plainville facility have been contaminated by radionuclides, heavy metals, and …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0928-23 WCPP RISK PURCHASING GROUP, INC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. … death lawsuit brought by the estate of a person alleged to have died because of mold. In an underlying action, …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2773-20 ESTATE OF MIKE ALEXANDER, … AUTHORITY, Plaintiffs/Intervenors- Respondents, v. GEMINI INSURANCE CO. and TOKIO MARINE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.,1 … and any reasonable expectations of coverage Northeast may have had were inconsequential given the unambiguous auto …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1375-22 MASOOD T. MALIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … Cas. Ins. Co. v. Vassas, 139 N.J. 163, 167 (1995)). We have also recognized that "the Supreme Court's rationale in …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2134-22 RQ FLOORS CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. and PHILIP ZITO, … coverage. Zito explained that $800,000 in coverage would have been "far too much coverage for a company that was only …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3361-21 PENN NATIONAL INSURANCE, as subrogee of SAMUEL R. BERGER, … personal knowledge, he explained Villarejo could not have merged directly into the center lane of Route 287. The …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1603-22 ZULFIGAR1 AHMED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and CITY OF … is needed where the factfinder would not be expected to have sufficient knowledge or experience and would have to …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2615-21 ROCKLEIGH COUNTRY CLUB, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, a/k/a THE HARTFORD, d/b/a HARTFORD FIRE … of social events, including those that were or could have been scheduled at plaintiff's venue, continued from EO …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0069-21 MARLENE CARIDE, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CONSTRUCTION, … whole. I also note it is far less than the Department could have requested under N.J.S.A. 17:22B-17, which allows the …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2909-23 RENEE KRAMPETZ AND SCOTT … for claims of medical malpractice of themselves and any employees and physicians." And that the medical defendants … deviation to plaintiffs." Thus, "plaintiff[s] would then have the right to demonstrate the deviations from the …
- njcourts.gov… You will have to comply with all conditions of probation and anything the court may order. This includes having regular contact with your probation officer at their office and in your home; taking drug tests; attending school or getting employment; paying fines; getting …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2993-21 CITY OF NEWARK, … The Unions filed unfair practice charges with Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) against the City to … recognized that its prior rulings as well as our "courts have held that procedural safeguards associated with …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3505-21 WATFORD SPECIALTY INSURANCE … Denis Mucha1 sustained injuries after he was assaulted by employees at defendant MDF 92 River Street, LLC d/b/a Wild … "property damage" to which this insurance applies. We will have the right and duty to defend the insured against any …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2538-23 MARC FEDER DMD, PC and MARC … FEDER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … various times until its present form. The laws of our state have long required the owners of private passenger vehicles …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1553-23 BURLINGTON COUNTY MUNICIPAL … Joint Insurance Fund, as subrogee of several township employees, and the Township of Pemberton, County of … proceed, and the non-appearing party shall be deemed to have waived the right to demand a trial de novo." R. …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0637-22 JAMES H. DREVS and PATRICIA … v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … coverage of the damage to the pool. The letter stated: We have reviewed your policy and believe we have sufficient …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1446-23 ANGELA KOUKOUNIAS, … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and KEVIN A. … upon that, it would seem to me that the next thing you have to do is answer [q]uestion [four] and that's what is …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2607-22 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LALLYGONE LIMITED … Lallygone." Specifically, the court noted that it did not have "a scintilla of evidence of damages other than storage …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2322-21 CHERYL SAUSELEIN-RACZ, … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … of your household[.] As a result of the rescission, you have not been provided automobile insurance with [NJM] since …
- njcourts.gov… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0473-22 GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., … We commence our review by defining the task at hand. We have long recognized when adjudicating a matter returning to … presence in New Jersey; the plaintiff employed 6,000 employees and paid state and local taxes; ten of …