Filters
- Directive #03-21 – Revised Children in Court Standards and Reissuance of Forms and the Appellate Division Protocol Administrative Directivesnjcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives… FROM: Glenn A. Grant, J.A.D SUBJECT: Family – Revised Children in Court Standards and Reissuance of Forms and the … 4); and • Appellate Division’s Administrative Protocol for Termination of Parental Rights Appeals (Administrative … focus on strengthening families, preventing removal, and supporting reunification and family engagement. Emphasis is …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5560-17T2 A-5561-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant … parents can constitute injury sufficient to authorize the termination of parental rights." In re Guardianship of …
- A-5560-17T2/A-5561-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5560-17T2 A-5561-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of fact are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant … parents can constitute injury sufficient to authorize the termination of parental rights." In re Guardianship of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3769-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that termination would not do more harm than good under N.J.S.A. … emotional harm over 5 A-3769-23 time." Rosie's Law Guardian supported the Division's plan of termination of Boris' …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3769-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that termination would not do more harm than good under N.J.S.A. … emotional harm over 5 A-3769-23 time." Rosie's Law Guardian supported the Division's plan of termination of Boris' …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2088-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … prongs of the child's best interests standard necessary for termination of parental rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). … all of Judge Suh's findings concerning the four prongs are supported by substantial and credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2088-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … prongs of the child's best interests standard necessary for termination of parental rights. See N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). … all of Judge Suh's findings concerning the four prongs are supported by substantial and credible evidence. N.J. Div. of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … positive bond" with defendant, so adoption was "the most supported permanency plan . . . ." The maternal grandmother … Moreover, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The maternal grandmother did …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … positive bond" with defendant, so adoption was "the most supported permanency plan . . . ." The maternal grandmother … Moreover, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The maternal grandmother did …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4668-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … legal principles, and standard of review, we affirm the termination of John's parental rights substantially for the … contacts between defendant and the Division amply support the trial court's findings with respect to his …
- A-4668-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4668-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … legal principles, and standard of review, we affirm the termination of John's parental rights substantially for the … contacts between defendant and the Division amply support the trial court's findings with respect to his …
- A-0222-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… MELVIN, Complainant-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Respondent-Respondent. … (DCPP), appeals from an August 3, 2016 final agency determination by the Director of the Division on Civil Rights … performance. We affirm because the Division's findings are supported by substantial credible evidence. I. DCPP hired …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4840-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in therapy and mental health treatment programs, pay child support, demonstrate financial stability, and undergo … later changed to "not established" when Alex appealed the determination and Jennifer refused to testify against him. On …
- A-4840-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4840-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in therapy and mental health treatment programs, pay child support, demonstrate financial stability, and undergo … later changed to "not established" when Alex appealed the determination and Jennifer refused to testify against him. On …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2885-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … J.W. (Jane)2, the child's mother, does not appeal the termination of her parental rights. Larry argues the … legal principles, and sufficient credible evidence supports the court's findings. Therefore, we affirm. I. We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2885-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … J.W. (Jane)2, the child's mother, does not appeal the termination of her parental rights. Larry argues the … legal principles, and sufficient credible evidence supports the court's findings. Therefore, we affirm. I. We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2305-19T1 NEW JERSEY OF DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … AS TO THE FIRST HALF OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(A)(3) WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD WHERE DCPP MADE LITTLE EFFORT TO … BECAUSE THE FAMILY PART'S CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS WAS BASED ENTIRELY ON HEARSAY …
- A-2305-19T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2305-19T1 NEW JERSEY OF DIVISON OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … AS TO THE FIRST HALF OF N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(A)(3) WAS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD WHERE DCPP MADE LITTLE EFFORT TO … BECAUSE THE FAMILY PART'S CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS WAS BASED ENTIRELY ON HEARSAY …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4929-15T3 A-4931-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … date as the order. Judge Bernstein's factual findings are supported by substantial credible evidence, including his … action concerning that child, which resulted in termination of defendants' parental rights. 4 A-4929-15T3 …
- A-4929-15T3/A-4931-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4929-15T3 A-4931-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … date as the order. Judge Bernstein's factual findings are supported by substantial credible evidence, including his … action concerning that child, which resulted in termination of defendants' parental rights. 4 A-4929-15T3 …