-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0676-18T4 NICHOLAS VALLO JR., Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and BUILDERS GENERAL SUPPLY CO., Respondent. __________________________ Submitted January 29, 2020 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF REGISTRATION AS A SECURITY OFFICER. II. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited, with …
-
njcourts.gov
… the state plan, actually exceeding it, and because staffing decisions fell within management's prerogative. The … the category of managerial prerogatives, including staffing decisions. To allow the grievance to proceed on that issue … and practice, "[w]here a grievance has challenged staffing decisions, but seeks no safety-related remedy that can be …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2188-22 ALTOWAN NIXON, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 11, 2025 – Decided March 28, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and …
njcourts.gov
… correctly applied the law in place when they rendered their decisions and because substantial credible evidence in the … Tribunal nor the Board addressed that request in their decisions. The question of a refund waiver "should be …
njcourts.gov
… placement by adopting regulations that delegate placement decisions to various agency officials, subject to prescribed … 10A:9-3.3 apply to any decision on custody status: (a) Decisions on transfers and assignments to housing; work, …
njcourts.gov
… a huff.'" We find merit to these arguments. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited, with …
-
njcourts.gov
… placement by adopting regulations that delegate placement decisions to various agency officials, subject to prescribed … 10A:9-3.3 apply to any decision on custody status: (a) Decisions on transfers and assignments to housing; work, …
-
njcourts.gov
… 8 II. "[We] have 'a limited role' in the review of [agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) … Carroll, 339 N.J. Super. 429, 437 (App. Div. 2001)). "Board decisions are afforded a deferential standard of review and … 127, which extended the deadline for the issuance of agency decisions, and which remained in effect A-0312-21 12 until …
-
njcourts.gov
… 8 II. "[We] have 'a limited role' in the review of [agency] decisions." In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011) … Carroll, 339 N.J. Super. 429, 437 (App. Div. 2001)). "Board decisions are afforded a deferential standard of review and … 127, which extended the deadline for the issuance of agency decisions, and which remained in effect A-0312-21 12 until …
-
njcourts.gov
… a huff.'" We find merit to these arguments. Our review of decisions by administrative agencies is limited, with …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2188-22 ALTOWAN NIXON, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________ Submitted March 11, 2025 – Decided March 28, 2025 Before Judges Susswein and …
-
njcourts.gov
… correctly applied the law in place when they rendered their decisions and because substantial credible evidence in the … Tribunal nor the Board addressed that request in their decisions. The question of a refund waiver "should be …
njcourts.gov
… that could be imposed" and were consistent with prior decisions. The Commissioner revoked Tepedino's producer's … N.J. 19, 27 (2007). "[A]n appellate court reviews agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." … 390 (2020) ("Wide discretion is afforded to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge"). …
-
njcourts.gov
… that could be imposed" and were consistent with prior decisions. The Commissioner revoked Tepedino's producer's … N.J. 19, 27 (2007). "[A]n appellate court reviews agency decisions under an arbitrary and capricious standard." … 390 (2020) ("Wide discretion is afforded to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge"). …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0880-15T2 RICHARD J. SPILLANE, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _________________________ Argued May 15, 2019 – Decided July 16, 2019 Before Judges Accurso and Moynihan. …
njcourts.gov
… words, for extending the double counting principle to PTI decisions as defendant now proposes. We note the double …
njcourts.gov
… decision was or on what it was based. We cannot base our decisions on speculation. The circumstances surrounding the …
njcourts.gov
… Court in affirming the Bankruptcy Court. We recognize those decisions are unpublished, but they relate directly to the …
njcourts.gov
… Redden administratively appealed the respective panels' decisions to the full Board. On April 28, 2021, the full … (quoting Trantino VI, 166 N.J. at 173). Therefore, Board decisions may only be reversed if "arbitrary and … 213, 222-23 (2016) ("Judicial review of the Parole Board's decisions is guided by the arbitrary and capricious standard …