-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0069-21 MARLENE CARIDE, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CONSTRUCTION, … whole. I also note it is far less than the Department could have requested under N.J.S.A. 17:22B-17, which allows the …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … FOR THE PROPOSED CREATION OF A PK-12 ALL- PURPOSE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BY THE BOROUGH OF SEA BRIGHT, BOROUGH OF … 24, 2024, the Boroughs of Highlands and Atlantic Highlands have been dismissed from this appeal. Additionally, a …
njcourts.gov
… You will have to comply with all conditions of probation and anything the court may order. This includes having regular contact with your probation officer at their office and in your home; taking drug tests; attending school or getting employment; paying fines; getting …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0438-23 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CLEARVIEW REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, GLOUCESTER COUNTY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … exemption for existing regional school districts, it would have done so explicitly. See also N.J.S.A. 18A:7F-32(b) …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2993-21 CITY OF NEWARK, … The Unions filed unfair practice charges with Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) against the City to … recognized that its prior rulings as well as our "courts have held that procedural safeguards associated with …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2909-23 RENEE KRAMPETZ AND SCOTT … for claims of medical malpractice of themselves and any employees and physicians." And that the medical defendants … deviation to plaintiffs." Thus, "plaintiff[s] would then have the right to demonstrate the deviations from the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3505-21 WATFORD SPECIALTY INSURANCE … Denis Mucha1 sustained injuries after he was assaulted by employees at defendant MDF 92 River Street, LLC d/b/a Wild … "property damage" to which this insurance applies. We will have the right and duty to defend the insured against any …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2538-23 MARC FEDER DMD, PC and MARC … FEDER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … various times until its present form. The laws of our state have long required the owners of private passenger vehicles …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1553-23 BURLINGTON COUNTY MUNICIPAL … Joint Insurance Fund, as subrogee of several township employees, and the Township of Pemberton, County of … proceed, and the non-appearing party shall be deemed to have waived the right to demand a trial de novo." R. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0637-22 JAMES H. DREVS and PATRICIA … v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … coverage of the damage to the pool. The letter stated: We have reviewed your policy and believe we have sufficient …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1446-23 ANGELA KOUKOUNIAS, … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and KEVIN A. … upon that, it would seem to me that the next thing you have to do is answer [q]uestion [four] and that's what is …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2607-22 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LALLYGONE LIMITED … Lallygone." Specifically, the court noted that it did not have "a scintilla of evidence of damages other than storage …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2322-21 CHERYL SAUSELEIN-RACZ, … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … of your household[.] As a result of the rescission, you have not been provided automobile insurance with [NJM] since …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3942-21 DE PASQUALE COLOUR & DESIGN, … d/b/a DEPASQUALE THE SPA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. … cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. 2 A-3942-21 PER CURIAM We have been advised that this matter has been amicably …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0473-22 GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., … We commence our review by defining the task at hand. We have long recognized when adjudicating a matter returning to … presence in New Jersey; the plaintiff employed 6,000 employees and paid state and local taxes; ten of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1203-22 YAAKOV SIEGEL and CHANA SIEGEL, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. US COASTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0711-24 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ALLSTATE NEW … of counsel and on the brief). Respondents and Intervenor have not filed briefs. PER CURIAM On leave granted, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3780-20 GABRIELLA'S LLC, d/b/a … OVER EASY KITCHEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP,1 TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, and … the 'period of restoration' that [the insured] would not have incurred if there had been no direct physical loss or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2009-21 FLEMING RUVOLDT PLLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES … the "period of restoration" that [plaintiff] would not have incurred if there had been no direct physical loss or …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0619-21 GRAND CRU, LLC d/b/a RESTAURANT NICHOLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE … incur during the "period of restoration" that you would not have incurred if there had been no direct physical loss or …