njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may …
njcourts.gov
… Defendant’s other motor vehicle offenses included stop sign violations, speeding, unsafe operation of a motor vehicle, … however, due to defendant’s history of motor vehicle violations. The court declined defendant’s request that it …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1944-14T1 IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF: STEVEN C. BRIGHAM, M.D. LICENSE NO. MA05106800 TO PRACTICE MEDICINE AND SURGERY IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5389-15T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT BELL, a/k/a SHABAZZ HAKIM, BELL JAY and SHABAZZ H, Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ Submitted May 15, 2018 – …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3241-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. E.W., Defendant-Appellant, and R.A., Defendant. __________________________________ IN …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5215-14T4 C.A.,1 a Minor, by her Mother and Guardian ad Litem, ESTHER APPLEGRAD, ESTHER APPLEGRAD, individually, and GEDALIA APPLEGRAD, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4848-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARQUISE HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant. Submitted March 13, 2018 - Decided Before Judges Carroll, Mawla and DeAlmeida. On appeal from …
njcourts.gov
… the trial court (1) failed to correctly rule on Gilmore1 violations he alleged during jury selection; and (2) erred …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5586-13T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT L. HAYES, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________ Submitted February 7, 2017 – Decided Before Judges …
njcourts.gov
… Thus, the judge awarded plaintiff $25,000 for defendant's violations of the confidentiality agreement, and ordered …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
… conduct, plaintiff's complaint only addressed his alleged violations of secular law rather than the UMC's polity. In …
njcourts.gov
1 SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2317-14T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RASHAWN BOND, Defendant-Appellant. Argued September 26, 2017 - Decided Before Judges Carroll, Leone and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1042-15T4 MICHAEL J. MANDELBAUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK ARSENEAULT, Defendant-Respondent. ________________________________ Argued December 20, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and …
njcourts.gov
… asserts she is arguably responsible only for ethical violations not criminal conduct. In State v. Thompson, we … of interest laws, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-23, because those ethical violations did not provide sufficient notice such misconduct …
njcourts.gov
… project was not executed, there would be voltage violations in the region." If proper voltage was not …
njcourts.gov
… to punish the non-responsive party for alleged discovery violations. See Kellam v. Feliciano, 376 N.J. Super. 580 …