Filters
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-2329-19 A-3679-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proved all four prongs of the statutory criteria for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In particular, the … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings," N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & …
- A-2329-19/A-3679-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-2329-19 A-3679-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proved all four prongs of the statutory criteria for termination under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). In particular, the … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings," N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2710-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of the best interests test warranting termination of his parental rights under N.J.S.A. 3 … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports her findings. I. We summarize the pertinent facts …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2710-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of the best interests test warranting termination of his parental rights under N.J.S.A. 3 … applied the law, and substantial credible evidence supports her findings. I. We summarize the pertinent facts …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1847-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of defendant's parental rights is in Alan's best … minor children besides reunification . . . is indicated and supported." The Division also obtained an updated …
- A-1847-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1847-17T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … and Permanency proved by clear and convincing evidence that termination of defendant's parental rights is in Alan's best … minor children besides reunification . . . is indicated and supported." The Division also obtained an updated …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3537-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kelly's parental rights to Wes was in his … informed Nancy its goal was still "to see how [it] could support her in a way that she would be agreeable to KLG of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3537-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division proved by clear and convincing evidence termination of Kelly's parental rights to Wes was in his … informed Nancy its goal was still "to see how [it] could support her in a way that she would be agreeable to KLG of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1092-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we limit our discussion to the facts leading to the termination of Carol's parental rights. 3 A-1092-21 I. We do … of fact are not disturbed unless "'they are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-1092-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1092-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we limit our discussion to the facts leading to the termination of Carol's parental rights. 3 A-1092-21 I. We do … of fact are not disturbed unless "'they are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1092-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … we limit our discussion to the facts leading to the termination of Carol's parental rights. 3 A-1092-21 I. We do … of fact are not disturbed unless "'they are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-2870-15T2 A-2871-15T21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … social services, was referred to a multi-cultural parent support program, and was provided with a parent mentor to … was changed from reunification with D.M.K. and T.A.C. to termination of parental rights. DCPP filed a complaint for …
- A-2870-15T2, A-2871-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-2870-15T2 A-2871-15T21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … social services, was referred to a multi-cultural parent support program, and was provided with a parent mentor to … was changed from reunification with D.M.K. and T.A.C. to termination of parental rights. DCPP filed a complaint for …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4378-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm. At the guardianship … 1 The children's father, K.E.S., does not appeal from the termination of his rights. Therefore, we use "defendant" to …
- A-4378-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4378-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … 30:4C-15.1(a). The Law Guardian joins the Division in supporting the judgment. We affirm. At the guardianship … 1 The children's father, K.E.S., does not appeal from the termination of his rights. Therefore, we use "defendant" to …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4101-17T2 A-4103-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 3 …
- A-4101-17T2/A-4103-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4101-17T2 A-4103-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 3 …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1011-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (2002). Our task is to determine whether the decision "is supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" [i]n the … Division must prove by clear and convincing evidence that termination of parental rights is in the 7 A-1011-16T3 best …
- A-1011-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1011-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … (2002). Our task is to determine whether the decision "is supported by '"substantial and credible evidence" [i]n the … Division must prove by clear and convincing evidence that termination of parental rights is in the 7 A-1011-16T3 best …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0447-24 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … are satisfied the competent, substantial trial evidence supports the trial judge's decision to terminate Nancy's … 2023, the Division changed its permanency plan for Anne to termination of parental rights followed by adoption by …