-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … pre- and post-incident reveal he was not." The judge pointed to the fact defendant did not adhere to Lewis's … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a1475-21.pdf … A-1475-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RASHAWN BOND …
njcourts.gov
… Docket Nos.: 005635-2004, 001986-2005, 001501-2006, 003458-2007 CIBA Specialty Chemical Corp. v. Township of Toms River … clarity, the court will refer to the property owner at all points in time as “Taxpayer.”6 5 The manufacturing facility … review was conducted in 2018. Taxpayer presented a PowerPoint report to the USEPA and NJDEP representatives in …
njcourts.gov
… Docket Nos.: 005635-2004, 001986-2005, 001501-2006, 003458-2007 CIBA Specialty Chemical Corp. v. Township of Toms River … clarity, the court will refer to the property owner at all points in time as “Taxpayer.”6 5 The manufacturing facility … review was conducted in 2018. Taxpayer presented a PowerPoint report to the USEPA and NJDEP representatives in …
njcourts.gov
… Docket Nos.: 005635-2004, 001986-2005, 001501-2006, 003458-2007 CIBA Specialty Chemical Corp. v. Township of Toms River … clarity, the court will refer to the property owner at all points in time as “Taxpayer.”6 5 The manufacturing facility … review was conducted in 2018. Taxpayer presented a PowerPoint report to the USEPA and NJDEP representatives in …
njcourts.gov
… Docket Nos.: 005635-2004, 001986-2005, 001501-2006, 003458-2007 CIBA Specialty Chemical Corp. v. Township of Toms River … clarity, the court will refer to the property owner at all points in time as “Taxpayer.”6 5 The manufacturing facility … review was conducted in 2018. Taxpayer presented a PowerPoint report to the USEPA and NJDEP representatives in …
-
njcourts.gov
… ARLENE PATIRE; ROBERT COCHRANE; DSJ FAMILY TRUST; DANIEL P. CONTE, III, STACEY A. CONTE and JAMIE G. KRESHPANE, Trustees … Trust. On this appeal, plaintiffs present the following points of argument: POINT I THE APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN, … Lakes, 28 N.J. 258, 269 (1958). Affirmed. … a2616-15.pdf … A-2616-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT ONE – DEFENSE COUNSEL'S INARTICULATE EXPLANATION AS TO … (1987) (adopting the Strickland test). Affirmed. … a0360-21.pdf … A-0360-21 - STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. WUKEEM W. LEWIS …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presenting the following arguments for our consideration: Point 1 - Admission by the officer that he improperly … warrant discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a2824-23.pdf … A-2824-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TONY T. YUSUFOV …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … in preparing for trial. He supported his argument by pointing out minor inconsistencies in the testimony of … his oral opinion of December 1, 2015. Affirmed. … a2594-15.pdf … A-2594-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Defendant presents the following arguments on appeal: POINT I: THE COURT ERRED BY EITHER WILLFULLY OR NEGLIGENTLY … motion under review, October 21, 2016. Affirmed. … a2201-16.pdf … A-2201-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … eight arguments through his counsel and several more points in a pro se brief. He did not appeal his sentence. In … this written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a1717-22.pdf … A-1717-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AL WHITE …
njcourts.gov
… the denial of the grievance, the Association sought the appointment of an arbitrator, and the Board filed a scope of … (4) met with petitioner; (5) reviewed the nursing manual and discussed it with nursing supervisor, Linda … 518, 526 (1992). A board's exercise of this discretionary power "may not be upset unless patently arbitrary, without …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and Roger were married on July 14, 2006. On October 14, 2007, Mary gave birth to twin boys, Charlie and Tim, both of … ~ t~ CLERK OF THE AP~TE DIVISION … a-1112-15-a-2869-15.pdf … A-1112-15T1/A-2869-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant raises, through counsel, the following arguments: POINT I MCKOY WAS PREJUDICED AT HIS TRIAL ON THE … for resentencing. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a4138-15.pdf … A-4138-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Feb. 10, 2021). We did not specifically address defendant's points regarding those subjects, as we considered the … No abuse of discretion occurred here. Affirmed. … a1393-20.pdf … A-1393-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… in domestic violence proceedings both of the serious consequences resulting from the entry of an FRO and of their … cross- A-2804-20 3 complaint.1 It was only at this point that the judge detailed the consequences of the FRO, … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2804-20.pdf … A-2804-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … 20, 2016. On appeal, plaintiffs raise the following issues: POINT I THE APPROVAL OF ESCO'S USE VARIANCE WAS TOTALLY … see also Kramer, 45 N.J. at 296. Affirmed. … a5285-15.pdf … A-5285-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… court's October 21, 2016 denial of his petition for post-conviction relief ("PCR"). We affirm that denial in all but … brief on the present appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT RECEIVED … no merit to them. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a2429-16.pdf … A-2429-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … summary judgment, plaintiff asserts the following errors: POINT I THE [TRIAL] COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT … any of plaintiff's causes of action. Affirmed. … a4410-18.pdf … A-4410-18 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … application. Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I: The PTI Director … under N.J.S.A. 2C:43-12(a)(1)-(5). Affirmed. … a2565-16.pdf … A-2565-16T1 …