-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … recovered the firearm through a warrantless search of a companion's backpack, which she had carried out of a parked … This appeal ensued. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE POLICE ILLEGALLY …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 29, 2025 – Decided July 24, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Bergman. On appeal from the Superior … we affirmed her conviction for first-degree conspiracy to commit murder. State v. Hildago-Bautista, No. A-2965-18 … for discovery and her PCR petition raising the following points: POINT I DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 29, 2025 – Decided August 1, 2025 Before Judges Sumners and Bergman. On appeal from the Superior … of defendant's contentions without a hearing. After completion of the hearing, the judge denied defendant's PCR … defendant's self-represented brief asserts supplemental points contending the PCR judge's denial of his petition was …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 12, 2024 – Decided May 21, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Puglisi. On appeal from the … reflected "an inadvertent mistake" in connection with the completion of a permit application by a layperson. P.F.C. … appeal followed. On appeal, P.F.C. raises the following points for our consideration: [POINT I] A REVOCATION OF A …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 12, 2023 – Decided October 13, 2023 Before Judges Whipple, Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from … [The juvenile] was not charged with the crimes [committed by defendant or his co- defendants]. 3 A-3655-20 … attendant out and as he was out of the booth, they would come up and rob him." Means dropped McGriff and defendant …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued February 12, 2024 – Decided February 22, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Marczyk, and Chase. On appeal from the … break, defense counsel stated she "did not object [to this comment] at the time, because it was kind of already out … fee, fines, and penalties. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I DEFENDANT'S CONVICTIONS MUST BE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 13, 2024 – Decided June 20, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Rose. On appeal from the New Jersey … days in the restorative housing unit, thirty days loss of commutation time, and fifteen days loss of recreation, … disciplinary hearing officer's adjudication that an inmate committed a prohibited 1 Velez in fact argued that the DOC's …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 13, 2023 – Decided September 21, 2023 Before Judges Currier and Firko. On appeal from the Superior … conviction after the verdict. In a written opinion and accompanying order, the court denied the motion. In addressing … kidnapping charges." In this appeal, defendant renews his arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL …
njcourts.gov
… OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Submitted October 22, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2013-3349. Alterman & Associates, … officer.1 On appeal, petitioner raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE COMMISSION ERRED …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … 13-06-1277. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Michele A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, on … for the reasons stated by Judge Patrick J. Arre in his comprehensive June 25, 2018 oral decision. Mindful of our …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 24, 2022 – Decided January 31, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino, Mayer, and Natali. On appeal from the … of the footage. On appeal, defendant raises the following points in his brief: 4 A-3817-18 POINT I THE MISTRIAL MOTION … closing argument, the jury did not find defendant guilty of committing any offenses at the school. The jury acquitted …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 31, 2022 – Decided February 10, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … challenges the sentence imposed,1 arguing the following points: POINT I THIS COURT SHOULD REMAND FOR RESENTENCING … calendar to a plenary calendar. 3 A-0888-20 THE TIME OF THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENSE." N.J.S.A. 2C:44-l(b)(14). THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 7, 2023 – Decided April 14, 2023 Before Judges Geiger and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … we affirm. I. The record reflects that defendant's neighbor complained to municipal officials about water leaking … POINT I THE TRIAL COURT NEVER ASK[ED] THE PLAINTIFF FOR THE COMPLAINT OR THE SIGN[ED] MOTION. 3 A-2412-21 POINT II THE …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … the pre-trial sentence report listed offenses that were committed by his cousin, who has the same name. Judge Leath … failed to show there would have been a different outcome in the resolution of the unlawful possession of a …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 23, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Rothstadt. On appeal from the … pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:40-26(b). The State agreed to recommend that he serve the two mandatory 180-day jail … briefly discuss the merits. Defendant raised the following points on appeal: POINT I: THE USE OF 35 YEAR OLD …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 17, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fisher and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … the pre-trial sentence report listed offenses that were committed by his cousin, who has the same name. Judge Leath … failed to show there would have been a different outcome in the resolution of the unlawful possession of a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 31, 2022 – Decided February 10, 2022 Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … challenges the sentence imposed,1 arguing the following points: POINT I THIS COURT SHOULD REMAND FOR RESENTENCING … calendar to a plenary calendar. 3 A-0888-20 THE TIME OF THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENSE." N.J.S.A. 2C:44-l(b)(14). THE …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 24, 2022 – Decided January 31, 2022 Before Judges Sabatino, Mayer, and Natali. On appeal from the … of the footage. On appeal, defendant raises the following points in his brief: 4 A-3817-18 POINT I THE MISTRIAL MOTION … closing argument, the jury did not find defendant guilty of committing any offenses at the school. The jury acquitted …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Submitted October 22, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Rose. On appeal from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission, Docket No. 2013-3349. Alterman & Associates, … officer.1 On appeal, petitioner raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE COMMISSION ERRED …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted October 10, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Haas and Mayer. On appeal from the Superior … 13-06-1277. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Michele A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, on … for the reasons stated by Judge Patrick J. Arre in his comprehensive June 25, 2018 oral decision. Mindful of our …