njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3750-17T2 CARL LUPIA, … Argued September 11, 2019 – Decided August 11, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz, Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from … the judge reduced the net by plaintiff's fifty-percent comparative fault found by the jury for a final judgment of …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5647-17T2 DIANA STEVENS, … plaintiff treated her. The County investigated Kachalia's complaint, and a conflict resolution meeting was conducted … work an earlier shift, but Iqbal told her that they would revisit the issue in six months. On October 16, 2014, Iqbal …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4031-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Defendant-Appellant. Submitted November 6, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso, Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the … from her representation of defendant, citing his failure to communicate with her and pay for services she had rendered …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1251-15T3 DOMINIQUE DEMARQUET, … October 3, 2017 – Decided November 17, 2017 Before Judges Gilson and Mayer. On appeal from Superior Court … judgment to defendants and dismissing with prejudice her complaint that asserted violations of the New Jersey Civil …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3221-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued October 2, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … stopped at a red light, defendant, age fifteen, and an accomplice, R.J., jumped into her car. Defendant entered …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3750-17T2 CARL LUPIA, … Argued September 11, 2019 – Decided August 11, 2020 Before Judges Koblitz, Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from … the judge reduced the net by plaintiff's fifty-percent comparative fault found by the jury for a final judgment of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5647-17T2 DIANA STEVENS, … plaintiff treated her. The County investigated Kachalia's complaint, and a conflict resolution meeting was conducted … work an earlier shift, but Iqbal told her that they would revisit the issue in six months. On October 16, 2014, Iqbal …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3167-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued March 12, 2019 – Decided April 9, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman, Suter and Geiger. On appeal from … scheme. Wilson contacted Webb and arranged for him to come to her residence that night. When Webb pulled up, …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2490-14T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … ___________________________ Argued May 31, 2017 — Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Rothstadt and Sumners. On appeal from … Dennis Thigpen, Jr. of first- degree conspiracy to commit murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a) and N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1194-19 ELVIRA DUBOIS, as the … Rehabilitation Center at Hillsborough" and "Bridgeway." NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Center at Hillsborough (SLS). The allegations in the complaint involved the medical and nursing care defendants …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4031-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Defendant-Appellant. Submitted November 6, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso, Gilson and Rose. On appeal from the … from her representation of defendant, citing his failure to communicate with her and pay for services she had rendered …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION … posing as a fourteen-year-old girl, into traveling or accompanying the defendant to some location other than the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0126-23 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued January 10, 2024 – Decided April 29, 2024 Before Judges Vernoia, Gummer and Walcott- Henderson. On … Police Department reported to a shopping mall on a complaint of a carjacking involving two victims, Brandon …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3393-21 DIN NARAIN, HETRAM SINGH JOHN … Argued February 8, 2023 – Decided May 22, 2023 Before Judges Currier, Mayer and Enright. NOT FOR PUBLICATION … We affirm. I. In May 2020, plaintiffs filed a class action complaint against George Harms Constructions Company (GHCC) …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1009-20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff … Argued September 12, 2023 – Decided September 26, 2023 Before Judges Sumners and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … State v. Frost, 158 N.J. 76, 83 (1999)). "If, after completing such a review, it is apparent 6 A-1009-20 . . . …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0823-22 C.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … attorney confirmed he had not yet received the amended complaint and "need[ed] time to defend or respond to … we are constrained to remand this matter for the judge to revisit her findings under the second Silver prong. In finding …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … State failed to prove the officers who executed the search complied with the "knock-and-announce" rule. Specifically, …
njcourts.gov
… Iselin, New Jersey 08830-2712 (732) 549-5600 Attorneys for: Respondent IN THE MATTER OF CA~LIA M. BRADY JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT DOCKET NO . ACJC 2013-281 … the Superior Court and was initially assigned to the Civil Division; however, Respondent is currently sitting as a …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … New Jersey, Inc., inheritor of New Jersey Bell Telephone Company's local exchange service telephone network, has been …
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … PURPOSE MUST BE REVERSED BECAUSE ACQUITTAL OF THE ACCOMPANYING CHARGES ERASED THE INDENTIFICATION OF THE …