njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3589-21 WAYNE C. CHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, Defendant-Respondent, and NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION, Defendant. Argued April 24, 2024 – …
default
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0111-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.L., Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted September 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale …
njcourts.gov
… and the mitigating factors as affected by the probation violations." See ibid.; State v. Molina, 114 N.J. 181, …
-
njcourts.gov
… and the mitigating factors as affected by the probation violations." See ibid.; State v. Molina, 114 N.J. 181, …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0111-17T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. N.L., Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________ Submitted September 24, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3589-21 WAYNE C. CHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, Defendant-Respondent, and NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION, Defendant. Argued April 24, 2024 – …
-
njcourts.gov
… aware of prior injuries and ignored citations for safety violations. 176 N.J. 385 (2003). The Court concluded the … test because OSHA had cited defendant for several safety violations, the defendant had removed several safety devices … that OSHA had cited the employer for numerous serious violations that had not been corrected before the …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1404-22 GEORGANNE YOUNGCLAUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENTIAL HOME FUNDING CORP., its agents, servants and/or employees, TOM MARINARO, ROBERTO LUPI, and FRANK KURI, Defendants-Respondents. …
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0862-23 J.M.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K.A.K., Defendant-Respondent. Submitted October 2, 2024 – Decided October 28, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Marczyk. On appeal from the …
njcourts.gov
… that authorized "the imposition of fines and late fees" for violations of an association's rules and regulations. 8 …
default
… Act, (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13, the Custodian's violations did not rise to the level of a knowing and … evidence of record does not indicate that the Custodian's violations of OPRA had a positive element of conscious … in the record to support the GRC's finding that the City's violations were not knowing or willful, and the City did not …
default
… officer that he had changed his address. Based upon these violations, defendant's prior offenses while on probation, … TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE INSUBSTANTIAL NATURE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND BASED ITS DECISION ON UNRELIABLE HEARSAY. … officer that he had changed his address , were not violations of "substantial requirements" of his probation …
default
… that "he failed to take any action when he saw these clear violations of departmental policies." The CCDC issued a …
njcourts.gov
… these issues, that she could turn to whether the violations of the NJCFLA similarly violated the CFA and the …
-
njcourts.gov
… that "he failed to take any action when he saw these clear violations of departmental policies." The CCDC issued a …
-
njcourts.gov
… Act, (OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13, the Custodian's violations did not rise to the level of a knowing and … evidence of record does not indicate that the Custodian's violations of OPRA had a positive element of conscious … in the record to support the GRC's finding that the City's violations were not knowing or willful, and the City did not …
-
njcourts.gov
… officer that he had changed his address. Based upon these violations, defendant's prior offenses while on probation, … TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE INSUBSTANTIAL NATURE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AND BASED ITS DECISION ON UNRELIABLE HEARSAY. … officer that he had changed his address , were not violations of "substantial requirements" of his probation …
-
njcourts.gov
… on the heels of these notices, plaintiff claims these FFA violations – not actionable on their own – may form the … generated a lender's right to foreclose – but also FFA violations revealed by a lender's pre-suit notice of … in question, so the damage alleged as a result of the FFA violations is not readily apparent or assumable even from an …
-
njcourts.gov
… that authorized "the imposition of fines and late fees" for violations of an association's rules and regulations. 8 …
-
njcourts.gov
RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0862-23 J.M.,1 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K.A.K., Defendant-Respondent. Submitted October 2, 2024 – Decided October 28, 2024 Before Judges Currier and Marczyk. On appeal from the …