Filters
- A-5248-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… periods of time, or to hire provisionally. Many of the appointing authorities within the Judiciary are reluctant to … decision is limited. In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 27 (2007). A "strong presumption of reasonableness attaches" to … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a5248-18.pdf … A-5248-18 …
- A-1581-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Thereafter, a Chancery Division judge in Morris County appointed Brian J. Fruehling to act as trustee for Allocca's … Sales, Inc. v. Eisenberg, 397 N.J. Super. 64, 79 (App. Div. 2007) (citing Kaplan v. Skoloff & Wolfe, P.C., 339 N.J. … part and dismissed in part on the cross-appeal. … a1581-16.pdf … A-1581-16T1 …
- A-1950-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Zoe across her face while they were attending a doctor's appointment. DCPP substantiated3 Tamara for this physical … Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 (2007) (citing In re Guardianship of J.N.H., 172 N.J. 440, … opportunity to reunify with the children. … a1950-17.pdf … A-1950-17T4 …
- njcourts.gov… identities of the children and parties and to preserve the confidentiality of these proceedings. R. 1:38- 3(d)(12). NOT … Div. of Youth & Fam. Servs. v. M.M., 189 N.J. 261, 293 (2007)). "Moreover, by virtue of its specific jurisdiction, … in this opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0452-23.pdf … A-0452-23 – DCPP VS. H.A. AND T.S., IN THE MATTER OF …
- njcourts.gov… to meet with. If that’s not able to work out, then I will appoint a parenting mediator." However, rather than sending … 9:2-4. The Family Part, acting as parens patriae, is empowered to act in the best interest of the child. Parish v. … Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 (App. Div. 2007). This best interest standard "protects the 'safety, …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … support, Mackinnon v. Mackinnon, 191 N.J. 240, 254 (2007). However, we do not accord such deference to legal … remanded in part. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0312-23.pdf … A-0312-23 – D.B. VS. T.D.-B. (FM-04-0355-19, CAMDEN …
- njcourts.gov… in oral argument. He joins the opinion with counsel's consent. R. 2:13-2(b). A-0188-22 2 & O'Brien, LLC, … and retired as a vice principal in July 2008. In April 2007, following an investigation, the State of New Jersey, … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0188-22.pdf … A-0188-22 – MARIA AZZARO, ET AL. VS. BOARD OF …
- njcourts.gov… was nominated for the position in February 2022, and confirmed in September 2022. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … a chronological supervision report (CSR). On November 29, 2007, the NJSPB began prohibiting individuals on PSL from … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0571-23.pdf … A-0571-23 – C.A.L. AND C.T. VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, …
- njcourts.gov… of the marriage: R.K. (born 4/16/2005), H.K. (born 9/26/2007), and E.K. (born 4/14/2011).2 In 2014, the couple … visitation; 2) place the matter on a complex track; 3) appoint a guardian ad litem on behalf of the children; 4) … affirm the award of attorney's fees. Affirmed. … a0033-22.pdf … A-0033-22 – S.K. VS. A.K. AND Y.K. (FD-18-0177-22, …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … decision is limited. In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 27 (2007). "An administrative agency's final quasi- judicial … perpetrators. N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c). Affirmed. … a3165-21.pdf … A-3165-21 – DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ETC. …
- njcourts.gov… It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor … factual findings, State v. Elders, 192 N.J. 224, 243 (2007), and will uphold “factual findings in support of … and NORIEGA join in JUSTICE SOLOMON’s opinion. … a_36_22.pdf … State v. Amandeep K. Tiwana (087919) (Hudson County & …
- njcourts.gov… in oral argument but joins in the opinion with the consent of counsel. R. 2:13-2(b). A-3067-20 2 General, of … 182, 194 (2011) (quoting In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 483 (2007)). Thus, "[a]n administrative agency's final … of benefits in accordance with this opinion. … a3067-20.pdf … A-3067-20 - KAREN MCKNIGHT VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ET AL. …
- njcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Walden offers the following argument for our consideration: POINT I N.J.A.C. 10A:4-9.15(a) requires that "[a] finding of … possession of 'an object when he [or she] has physical or manual control of it.'" State v. Morrison, 188 N.J. 2, 14 …
- A-0933-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … we reject the argument, as well as defendant's other points on appeal, and affirm. I. In the fall of 2013, … for correction of the judgment of conviction. … a0933-16.pdf … A-0933-16T3 …
- A-0373-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … He presents the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE AMENDMENT OF THE INDICTMENT, THE MORNING TRIAL … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0373-17.pdf … A-0373-17T3 …
- A-1336-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… (Thomas Cannavo, of counsel and on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … appeal followed, in which defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE LAW DIVISION ERRRED IN FINDING DEFENDANT … the record and warrant our deference. Affirmed. … a1336-20.pdf … A-1336-20 …
- A-0754-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … challenges only the DWI conviction, raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE OFFICER LACKED … further discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0754-20.pdf … A-0754-20 …
- A-2749-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … conviction, it is not necessary to address the additional points the defendant raises. Those points are: 4 A-2749-14T2 … FOR RESENTENCING. Reversed and remanded. … a2749-14.pdf … A-2749-14T2 …
- A-1864-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… the October 19, 2016 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) without an evidentiary hearing. A … 2015) (slip op. at 5). On this appeal, defendant argues: POINT I: DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … 2 State v. Michaels, 136 N.J. 299 (1994). … a1864-16.pdf … A-1864-16T4 …
- A-4598-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of a seventy-two-month FET. Johnson appeals, arguing: POINT I THERE WERE INSUFFICIENT REASONS TO DENY PAROLE. … capriciously, or unreasonably. Affirmed. … a4598-18.pdf … A-4598-18T1 …