Filters
- A-2412-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… in February 2014. Defendant and plaintiff have three children but only the youngest child is unemancipated. The … Ira Ray (Ray). Defendant submitted a certification in support of his motion alleging plaintiff 3 A-2412-20 and Ray … 2A:34-23(n)). We will not disturb the Family Part judge's determination, unless we conclude: (1) the trial court failed …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3568-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not proffer any witnesses and supported the Division's plan for Skye to adopt Austin. Aaron objected to the termination of his parental rights and testified on his own …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3568-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The Law Guardian did not proffer any witnesses and supported the Division's plan for Skye to adopt Austin. Aaron objected to the termination of his parental rights and testified on his own …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3644-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … applicable law, we are satisfied the evidence in the record supports the decision to terminate Theresa's parental rights … the trial court changed the permanency plan from KLG to termination of Theresa's parental rights. A nine-day trial …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1833-20 A-1834-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … three and four. II. The legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights is well- settled. Parents … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
- A-1833-20/A-1834-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-1833-20 A-1834-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … three and four. II. The legal framework regarding the termination of parental rights is well- settled. Parents … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3322-21 A-3323-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENECY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … four prongs of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. 1 We use initials and … court correctly applied the law, and its findings are supported by substantial credible evidence. I. We summarize …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3322-21 A-3323-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENECY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … four prongs of the best-interests test necessary for the termination of parental rights. 1 We use initials and … court correctly applied the law, and its findings are supported by substantial credible evidence. I. We summarize …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not offer any documentary or testimonial evidence but supported the Division's application for termination of J.E.'s parental rights. Ms. Mata testified …
- A-0100-19T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0100-19T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … did not offer any documentary or testimonial evidence but supported the Division's application for termination of J.E.'s parental rights. Ms. Mata testified …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and ordered termination of the mother's parental rights to Alice.2 2 … decision to terminate the mother's parental rights is amply supported by the evidence. When terminating parental rights, …
- A-3983-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3983-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … all four prongs of N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), and ordered termination of the mother's parental rights to Alice.2 2 … decision to terminate the mother's parental rights is amply supported by the evidence. When terminating parental rights, …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4767-15T3 A-4768-15T3 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … this action and, after a four- day trial, secured the termination of Steven and Anna's parental rights to all … parental rights to Paul. Anna argues the evidence failed to support the judge's findings on all four statutory prongs. …
- A-4767-15T3/A-4768-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4767-15T3 A-4768-15T3 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … this action and, after a four- day trial, secured the termination of Steven and Anna's parental rights to all … parental rights to Paul. Anna argues the evidence failed to support the judge's findings on all four statutory prongs. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- A-2437-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2437-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the home and the court has considered alternatives to termination of parental rights; and (4) Termination of … are not disturbed unless they are "so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2140-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … offender3 and batterer,4 led to the removal and ultimate termination of her parental rights to these children by … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial and credible evidence on the …
- A-2140-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2140-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … offender3 and batterer,4 led to the removal and ultimate termination of her parental rights to these children by … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial and credible evidence on the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5609-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … THE TRIAL JUDGE AND THE EVIDENCE ADMITTED AT TRIAL DID NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL CONCLUSION THAT ALL FOUR PRONGS OF THE BEST … C. DCPP DID NOT PROVE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT TERMINATION WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD AS REQUIRED BY …