Filters
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2140-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … offender3 and batterer,4 led to the removal and ultimate termination of her parental rights to these children by … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial and credible evidence on the …
- A-2140-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2140-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … offender3 and batterer,4 led to the removal and ultimate termination of her parental rights to these children by … of the family court in terminating parental rights is supported by substantial and credible evidence on the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
- A-5644-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5644-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that the Division did not consider "alternatives to termination of parental rights" because it failed to … N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a)(4).2 All of the judge's findings are supported by substantial, credible evidence and, therefore, …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3538-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that defendant was "cognitively delayed" and has "limited support." Several days later, the Division received a report … June 12, 2019. The court approved the Division's plan for termination of M.F. and J.C.'s parental rights, followed by …
- A-3538-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3538-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … that defendant was "cognitively delayed" and has "limited support." Several days later, the Division received a report … June 12, 2019. The court approved the Division's plan for termination of M.F. and J.C.'s parental rights, followed by …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1742-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H. left on a windowsill, the cousin received no financial support from A.H. to care for the child. The cousin reported … held a permanency hearing and approved DCPP's plan for termination of A.H.'s parental rights. A trial was held in …
- A-1742-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1742-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … A.H. left on a windowsill, the cousin received no financial support from A.H. to care for the child. The cousin reported … held a permanency hearing and approved DCPP's plan for termination of A.H.'s parental rights. A trial was held in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision. The Law Guardians for Eddie and … should be reversed. Earl did not appeal from the court's termination order and has not participated in this appeal. …
- A-5268-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5268-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting its decision. The Law Guardians for Eddie and … should be reversed. Earl did not appeal from the court's termination order and has not participated in this appeal. …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3506-21 A-3508-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. I. The facts are fully … visitation for both Tom and Fara and referred them to support services for mental health, parenting classes, and …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3506-21 A-3508-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of their parental rights. I. The facts are fully … visitation for both Tom and Fara and referred them to support services for mental health, parenting classes, and …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2518-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 (2007)). "The focus of a termination-of-parental-rights hearing is the best interests …
- A-2518-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2518-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … of review, we must uphold the trial court's findings if "supported by adequate, substantial, and credible evidence." … Servs. v. G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 (2007)). "The focus of a termination-of-parental-rights hearing is the best interests …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for them, and said he lacked income because he paid support for six children. Defendant did not know how he … that [he’d] always envisioned." The court concluded that termination of defendant's parental rights would not do more …
- A-4943-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4943-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … for them, and said he lacked income because he paid support for six children. Defendant did not know how he … that [he’d] always envisioned." The court concluded that termination of defendant's parental rights would not do more …
- A-5165-14T2/A-5169-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5165-14T2 A-5169-14T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … J.A. said he would not be able to attend because he has to support the family. The Division then changed its permanency plan to termination of parental rights followed by adoption. In …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … daughter, K.N., born in 2002. Defendant only appeals the termination of his parental rights to S.N. All three … was assessed and properly ruled out, and expert testimony supported the Division's plan for select home adoption. …
- A-4390-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-15T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … daughter, K.N., born in 2002. Defendant only appeals the termination of his parental rights to S.N. All three … was assessed and properly ruled out, and expert testimony supported the Division's plan for select home adoption. …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1950-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proven the fourth prong of the best interest test—whether termination of parental rights would not do more harm than … Tamara contends there was insufficient credible evidence to support the trial court's findings under any of the four …