njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 1, 2023 – Decided March 21, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … 466 U.S. at 687, by demonstrating that: 1) counsel's performance was deficient, and 2) the deficient performance actually prejudiced the accused's defense. The …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 13, 2024 – Decided December 4, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Chase. On appeal from the … advised defendant of his Miranda1 rights. MacRae then informed defendant that his "partner saw you meeting with … defendant's motion to suppress and subsequently issued a conforming order. First, the court found the testimony provided …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Whipple and Rose. On appeal from … v. Gamble, 218 N.J. 412, 432 (2014). The police may perform a warrantless protective sweep of a vehicle's passenger … The officer called for backup and was met by four other uniformed officers, who assisted in directing two of the four …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from the … OUT OF STATE WITNESS WHO HAD PRIOR CONVERSATIONS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING WHO PULLED THE TRIGGER IN THIS CASE AND INFORMATION THAT ONLY SOMEONE WHO WAS NOT ONLY PRESENT KNEW …
default
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … to be paid pursuant to the provisions of the State Tax Uniform Procedure Law, [N.J.S.A.] 54:48-1 et seq., as amended … The state of mind requirement in N.J.S.A. 54:52-19 uses the formulation "intent to evade, avoid or otherwise not pay any …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … to be paid pursuant to the provisions of the State Tax Uniform Procedure Law, [N.J.S.A.] 54:48-1 et seq., as amended … The state of mind requirement in N.J.S.A. 54:52-19 uses the formulation "intent to evade, avoid or otherwise not pay any …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Moynihan. On appeal from the … OUT OF STATE WITNESS WHO HAD PRIOR CONVERSATIONS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING WHO PULLED THE TRIGGER IN THIS CASE AND INFORMATION THAT ONLY SOMEONE WHO WAS NOT ONLY PRESENT KNEW …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted September 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Whipple and Rose. On appeal from … v. Gamble, 218 N.J. 412, 432 (2014). The police may perform a warrantless protective sweep of a vehicle's passenger … The officer called for backup and was met by four other uniformed officers, who assisted in directing two of the four …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 13, 2024 – Decided December 4, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Chase. On appeal from the … advised defendant of his Miranda1 rights. MacRae then informed defendant that his "partner saw you meeting with … defendant's motion to suppress and subsequently issued a conforming order. First, the court found the testimony provided …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 1, 2023 – Decided March 21, 2023 Before Judges Accurso and Natali. On appeal from the Superior … 466 U.S. at 687, by demonstrating that: 1) counsel's performance was deficient, and 2) the deficient performance actually prejudiced the accused's defense. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… the residents of New Jersey with a fair and impartial forum to resolve their disputes. 5 Throughout the state, … just about complex cases, high-pro- file defendants, or the formality of the courtroom. Justice is also the daily work … programs for veterans, homeowners, and families. It also informs the goals we set for resolv- ing cases in a timely …
-
njcourts.gov
… New Jersey 07102 Tel: (609) 815-2922, Ext. 54680 … NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL … OF THE TAX COURT … NJPRA’s Certificate of Incorporation states that it was formed for the purpose of achieving the following goals: [1: … allowable”); Atlantic County New School, Inc. v. City of Pleasantville, 2 N.J. Tax 192, 196 (Tax 1981) (concluding …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 21, 2026 – Decided February 27, 2026 Before Judges Gilson and Firko. On appeal from an … be defendant or another person. Investigators obtained information that defendant had been at the gym at … with counsel" because he could not "accurately provid[e] information," obtain advice from his attorneys, and those …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 8, 2025 – Decided January 21, 2026 Before Judges Natali and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from the … Sahil K. Kabse, Acting Sussex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Shaina Brenner, Special Deputy Attorney … was self-represented and did not testify. He, however, informed the court that he was there "as a special appearance" …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 14, 2023 – Decided December 5, 2023 Before Judges Enright and Paganelli. On appeal from the … the totality of the circumstances" and the sweep was performed "for officer safety." Defendant moved for … an oral opinion, denying the application. He issued a conforming order three days later. In the judge's oral opinion, …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 2, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia. On appeal from the Superior … the non-working light as a safety hazard, Ozdemir performed a traffic stop in order to inform the driver the light was not working. He admitted that …
default
… Submitted May 16, 2022 – Decided June 14, 2022 Before Judges Rose and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … 18-10-0609. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Margaret McLane, Assistant Deputy Public … William A. Daniel, Union County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Michele C. Buckley, Assistant Prosecutor, of …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 15, 2021 – Decided April 6, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … the totality of circumstances authorized the police to perform a protective sweep of the area inside the car where … "make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that might well elude an …
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 30, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Whipple and Mawla. On appeal from the … Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; … home. Defendant refused to provide consent. McCall then informed defendant he would obtain a warrant. Another police …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted May 16, 2022 – Decided June 14, 2022 Before Judges Rose and Enright. On appeal from the Superior … 18-10-0609. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Margaret McLane, Assistant Deputy Public … William A. Daniel, Union County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Michele C. Buckley, Assistant Prosecutor, of …