-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … appeal from his conviction, we observed the following: In Points III, IV, and V, defendant argues the judge erred by … was previously decided by this court. Affirmed. … a3064-19.pdf … A-3064-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … followed wherein petitioner raised the following arguments: POINT I. APPELLANT WAS DENIED CONFRONTATION WITH HIS ACCUSER … error with any of his other arguments. Affirmed. … a1241-19.pdf … A-1241-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … only a few brief comments. As for defendant's first three points, some background is required. At trial, the jury … the trial judge correctly recognized. Affirmed. … a0108-17.pdf … A-0108-17T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CALLAWAY'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Third-Party Defendant. … evidentiary rulings.3 His brief presents the following points of argument: 3 The February 16, 2018 order was … were relevant to issues in the case. Affirmed. … a5474-17.pdf … A-5474-17T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … use of defendant's pendente lite budget as the starting point for the alimony determination was inappropriate … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3286-19.pdf … A-3286-19T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … scene. An impartial witness encountered defendant and pointed out Ray's body lying in the road. Defendant claimed … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a1079-17.pdf … A-1079-17T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, Jackson raises the following arguments: POINT I THE PREMATURE GRANT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE … of Jackson's rights under the Act. Affirmed. … a1815-15.pdf … A-1815-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … filed his first PCR petition. In the brief filed by his appointed counsel, defendant alleged ineffective assistance of … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a1304-23.pdf … A-1304-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DERRICK JOHNSON …
-
njcourts.gov
… of first-degree murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a)(1) and (2); second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. … by a consecutive five-year prison term. Defendant argues: POINT I IT WAS ERROR TO HAVE PERMITTED EVIDENCE CONCERNING … opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). 28 A-2456-19 Affirmed. … a2456-19.pdf … A-2456-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the issues raised by the parties, we reproduce the point headings in their respective appeal briefs.5 Plaintiff … documents pertaining to the tenancy. Affirmed. … a2159-22.pdf … A-2159-22 – SAMUEL BARRESI VS. FZG ENTERPRISES, LLC, …
-
njcourts.gov
… considering defendant's arguments, we find the first two points lack sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a … not quantitatively," Carey, 168 N.J. at 427, a judge is empowered to impose consecutive sentences even when 3 Yarbough … proceedings. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a4144-16.pdf … A-4144-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the following substantive issues for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING. . . DEFENDANT'S … the record does not indicate when it was filed. … a1533-24.pdf … A-1533-24 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CATELIN D. HICHOS …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … before closings. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: 2 State v. Clawans, 38 N.J. 162 (1962). 9 A-0265-20 … Our conscience is not shocked. Affirmed. … a0265-20.pdf … A-0265-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … states that "[e]very pedestrian upon a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an … would apportion comparative fault. 17 A-1978-20 … a1978-20.pdf … A-1978-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … arguments on appeal from denial of his PCR petition: POINT I – BECAUSE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE … warrant discussion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a1883-14.pdf … A-1883-14T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … container, N.J.S.A. 39:4-51(b). He appeals and argues: POINT I AS A MATTER OF LAW THE LOWER COURT ERRONEOUSLY … twenty-minute observation requirement. Affirmed. … a4605-16.pdf … A-4605-16T3 …
default
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … trial, Judge Thomas M. Moore rendered fact findings and concluded the church was entitled to the relief sought. … THAT [THE CHURCH'S] WITHDRAWAL FROM THE ASSOCIATION CON- STITUTED A BREACH OF THE AGREEMENT, THE COURT IMPOSED …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … and raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN PERMITTING THE STATE TO … for a new trial. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a4774-18.pdf … A-4774-18 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in his counseled brief, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DETECTIVE MURAGLIA'S … cogent reasons expressed by the judge. Affirmed. … a1788-18.pdf … A-1788-18 …
-
njcourts.gov
… LAW DIVISION, CIVIL PART DOCKET NO. ESXL288918 XINBA CONSTR. GROUP CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, B ~1 ~i ~ r———•— JIN … in Podias v. Mairs, 394 N.J. Super. 338, 352 (App. Div. 2007), which explains that a person is subject to liability … to ~. 4:6 2(e), is hereby GRANTED. 9 … xinbaconstrjinxu.pdf … ESX-L-2889-18 …