-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of consecutive sentences." Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I – THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR COUNT TWO … elements for the drug offense. Affirmed. … a1545-21.pdf … A-1545-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CHRISTIAN MOJICA …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … also noted Tyler admitted to pushing defendant at various points during the exchange. 4 A-0305-22 Gracie … guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Affirmed. … a0305-22.pdf … A-0305-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BRANDON MARONEY …
-
njcourts.gov
… OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY … unsuccessfully presented to the trial court. They contend: POINT 1: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT IT HAD NO … effect during the pendency of these proceedings. … a2625-21.pdf … A-2625-21 – NJ GOLDEN HOME CARE, INC., ET AL. VS. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … by defendant, he adds two additional arguments: 5 A-2991-23 POINT I – THE TRIAL COUNSEL OF [] DEFENDANT WAS INEFFECTIVE … is procedurally barred. See R. 3:22-5. Affirmed. … a2991-23.pdf … A-2991-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LOBENSKY DORMEVIL …
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … of his PCR petition. II. On this appeal, defendant argues: POINT I – DEFENDANT'S IAC ARGUMENT WAS NOT FORECLOSED BY THE DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION ON DIRECT APPEAL. POINT II – THE DEFENDANT WAS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THIS COURT SHOULD … Donohue in his well-reasoned decision. Affirmed. … a4278-19.pdf … A-4278-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points on appeal: 4 A-4412-15T2 POINT I THE APPELLATE … drawn therefrom are unassailable. Affirmed. … a4412-15.pdf … A-4412-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … On appeal, the County raises the following contentions: POINT ONE: The County Sheriff and his uniformed corrections … and indemnify county police officers). Affirmed. … a1390-17.pdf … A-1390-17T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … I. On appeal, defendants raise the following issues: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0700-21.pdf … A-0700-21 - MARLESE JOHNIKEN VS. FRANK BEEBE, ET AL. …
-
njcourts.gov
… Patricia B. Quelch argued the cause for appellant (Helmer, Conley & Kasselman, PA, attorneys; Patricia B. Quelch, of … 9, 2021 order. Appealing that order, defendant argues: POINT I THE HEARING COURT ERRED BY FINDING AGGRAVATING … not required to be merged into it"). Affirmed. … a2621-20.pdf … A-2621-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … followed. R.J. raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT INAPPROPRIATELY RELIED ON TESTIMONY … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0098-17.pdf … A-0098-17T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … and assessments. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: I. THE VERDICT WAS AGAINST THE … petition for post-conviction relief. Affirmed. … a5338-16.pdf … A-5338-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… from a January 2, 2015 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). Defendant argues he received … 2009 guilty plea. On appeal, defendant argues the following points: POINT I THE ORDER DENYING [PCR] SHOULD BE REVERSED … not satisfied prong two of Strickland. Affirmed. … a3399-14.pdf … A-3399-14T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… a September 23, 2016 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) and NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … be subject to Megan's Law only for ten years. Judge McBride pointed out that defendant waited six years beyond the ten … and well-reasoned opinion. Affirmed. … a1835-16.pdf … A-1835-16T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … mitigating factor fourteen. On appeal, defendant argues: POINT I RESENTENCING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE [JUDGE] FAILED … we need not reach the question of retroactivity. … a4819-18.pdf … A-4819-18 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … On appeal, plaintiff raises the following arguments: POINT I THE DEFENDANTS' VIOLATIONS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3593-18.pdf … A-3593-18 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … paperwork); and (4) constitutional violations. The court appointed counsel, who filed a brief on defendant's behalf "in … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3117-18.pdf … A-3117-18T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… E. Scott appeals from an April 5, 2017 order, denying his second petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). We affirm. … On appeal defendant asserts the following arguments: POINT ONE: THIS COURT MUST CLARIFY COURT RULE … of ineffective assistance of counsel. Affirmed. … a3846-16.pdf … A-3846-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Patricia B. Quelch argued the cause for appellant (Helmer, Conley & Kasselman, PA, attorneys; Patricia B. Quelch, of … 9, 2021 order. Appealing that order, defendant argues: POINT I THE HEARING COURT ERRED BY FINDING AGGRAVATING … not required to be merged into it"). Affirmed. … a2621-20.pdf … A-2621-20 - STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. WILLIAM A. MCCRAY …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … jurisdiction," under N.J.A.C. 1:1-3.1(a).2 J.W. argues: Point 1 The [DMAHS] erred in failing to provide medically … state and federal regulations. Affirmed. … a1835-22.pdf … A-1835-22 – J.W. VS. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE …