njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
default
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0777-20 IN RE BOROUGH OF LEONIA ORDINANCE NUMBERS 2018-14, 2018-15, and 2018-17. Submitted February 17, 2022 – Decided April 29, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Alvarez. On appeal from the New …
njcourts.gov
… issues identified by the panel. Johnson appealed those decisions to the full Board. The full Board issued a final … of Hawley, 98 N.J. 108, 112 (1984)). The Board's decisions are highly "'individualized discretionary … Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)). Accordingly, the Board's decisions are entitled to a presumption of validity, In re …
njcourts.gov
… by these principles, we discern no reason to disturb the decisions of the trial court or the Board, and affirm …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0777-20 IN RE BOROUGH OF LEONIA ORDINANCE NUMBERS 2018-14, 2018-15, and 2018-17. Submitted February 17, 2022 – Decided April 29, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Alvarez. On appeal from the New …
-
njcourts.gov
… issues identified by the panel. Johnson appealed those decisions to the full Board. The full Board issued a final … of Hawley, 98 N.J. 108, 112 (1984)). The Board's decisions are highly "'individualized discretionary … Bd., 62 N.J. 348, 359 (1973)). Accordingly, the Board's decisions are entitled to a presumption of validity, In re …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2549-16T3 EDWARD RUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF POLICE SERVICES/CHIEF OF POLICE KENNETH …
-
njcourts.gov
… penalty." Our role in reviewing administrative agency decisions is limited. In re Stallworth, 208 N.J. 182, 194 (2011). We affirm such decisions when they are supported by the evidence, even if …
-
njcourts.gov
… in parole matters. Our standard of review of the Board's decisions is limited, and "grounded in strong public policy … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
… by these principles, we discern no reason to disturb the decisions of the trial court or the Board, and affirm …
-
njcourts.gov
… of Education has adopted regulations governing appeals from decisions by the SE Commission. See 4 A-1959-21 N.J.A.C. … 2022 final agency decision. We consider appeals from final decisions or actions of state administrative agencies or … officers. R. 2:2-3(a)(2). We do not review administrative decisions when there is a further "right of review before …
-
njcourts.gov
… th[at] time." 4 A-0710-22 On appeal, Bossie argues "[t]he decisions to deny parole and impose a[n FET] were arbitrary … efforts while incarcerated." Our review of final decisions of the Board is limited. Malacow v. N.J. Dep't of … Corr., 457 N.J. Super. 87, 93 (App. Div. 2018). The Board's decisions, like those of other administrative agencies, will …
njcourts.gov
… deference to its expertise in the program it administers. Decisions by DMAHS limiting Medicaid eligibility are subject …
default
… 4 A-2591-17T2 contended the umpire's substantive decisions reflected his partiality. Defendant's allegations … surprise. He and his counsel claimed bias in the umpire's decisions throughout the ADR process. In defense counsel's … 1:7-4 to enable effective appellate review of trial court decisions). A supplemental explanation and clarification …
default
… of future criminal activity." Matos appealed the panels' decisions to the full Board, arguing: (1) the Board panel … 228 N.J. 204, 230 (2017). That is so because "Parole Board decisions are highly 'individualized discretionary … Neither the Board panel nor the Board based their decisions on those extraneous facts. Affirmed. … TARSIS …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0403-16T4 E.T., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent, and HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. …
njcourts.gov
… Taylor, 158 N.J. 644, 656 (1999). Our deference to agency decisions "applies to the review of disciplinary sanctions …
njcourts.gov
… 4 N.J.A.C. 10A:71-3.11(a) provides that "[p]arole decisions shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent … appealed both the two-member and the three-member Panel decisions to the full Board. In an August 27, 2014 final … the Board noted that the Panels amended their respective decisions to include his participation in those programs as …
njcourts.gov
… not before the Commission as it relates to the Commission's decisions issued on June 20, 2022 or April 10, 2024. 10 …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0403-16T4 E.T., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent, and HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. …