-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 13, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fisher, Accurso, and Gilson. On appeal from the … As part of the plea agreement, the State agreed to recommend that he be sentenced to two years of probation and … circumstances' because '[a]s time passes, justice becomes more elusive and the necessity for preserving finality …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Ostrer and Rose. On appeal from Superior Court … Michael H. Robertson, Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Perry Farhat, Assistant Prosecutor, of … 157 N.J. 463, 470-71 (1999). The rule of deference is more compelling where, as here, both judges made concurrent …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 9, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … No. 04-08-0563. Leschak & Associates, LLC, attorneys for appellant (John P. Leschak, on the brief). Michael H. … State v. Mitchell, 126 N.J. 565, 580 (1992)). Absent compelling extenuating circumstances, the burden to justify …
-
njcourts.gov
… _______________________ Submitted July 12, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Carroll. On appeal from the New … him guilty of, and imposing disciplinary sanctions for, committing prohibited acts *.004, fighting with another … of the religious services room when he heard loud arguing coming from the room and went to investigate. When he …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 4, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from Superior … 02- 10-1296. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Alan I. Smith, Designated Counsel, on the … of evidence. We offer no opinion as to the appropriate outcome of the hearing. [Id. at 580]. On remand, Judge Joseph …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 12, 2022 – Decided February 15, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … pro se. Esther Suarez, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Colleen Kristan Signorelli, Assistant … appeal followed. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT CAN FILE A …
-
A-61/62-19 Amicus Curiae Supplemental Brief
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… NEW JERSEY Docket No. 083396 IN RE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS OPINION NO. 735 o+i … Park, New Jersey 07932 (973) 400-4181 sstone@stoneconroy.com Attorneys for Amicus Curiae New Jersey Civil Justice Institute F_I LED …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 4, 2025 – Decided April 22, 2025 Before Judges Gilson and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … was ineffective in failing to provide defendant with complete discovery concerning his case. On this appeal, … his claim that his trial counsel failed to provide him with complete discovery, and (2) his certain persons convictions …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted December 14, 2022 – Decided July 21, 2023 Before Judges Mayer and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … Defendant also appealed this denial.2 Defendant also made a common law request for discovery items related to consensual … followed. On appeal, defendant presents the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 30, 2024 – Decided May 13, 2024 Before Judges Mayer and Augostini. On appeal from the New … lack of an adequate parole plan for reintegration into the community; and a risk assessment evaluation placing him at a … notwithstanding lack of admission; and restoration of commutation time. A three-member Board panel convened on …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 12, 2025 – Decided July 8, 2025 Before Judges Mayer, Rose and Puglisi. On appeal from the … located on the 1 Because defendant and the victim shared a common surname, we refer to the victim by her first name, … Automated Fingerprint Identification System requires ten points of identification to be entered into the database, …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON … to the November 3 meeting. In their first and second points, Kiely and Marzovilla argue, as they did before, that …
njcourts.gov
… Argued January 29, 2025 – Decided May 29, 2025 Before Judges Rose, DeAlmeida and Puglisi. On appeal from the … defendant MacArthur Mason of armed robbery, conspiracy to commit robbery, and weapons offenses for his part in … 5 A-2455-22 On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I [DEFENDANT]'S WAIVER …
njcourts.gov
… 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON … to the November 3 meeting. In their first and second points, Kiely and Marzovilla argue, as they did before, that …
njcourts.gov
… Argued September 20, 2023 – Decided November 1, 2023 Before Judges Currier, Firko and Susswein. On appeal from the … we conclude the trial court erred in charging the jury on accomplice liability, and the error was capable of producing … jail credit. II. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE DETECTIVES' (A) …
njcourts.gov
… Argued November 14, 2023 – Decided January 9, 2024 Before Judges Rose, Smith and Perez Friscia. On appeal from … she and her friend, S.W. (Steve), left his gated apartment complex in Cherry Hill. The State's theory was that … to count six.3 Defendant appeals raising the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 10, 2022 – Decided August 29, 2023 Before Judges Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the … fingernails. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT WAS DENIED … Olswfski. At the time of the discovery, the bedroom was in "complete disarray." Specifically, the window blinds "were …
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 7, 2023 – Decided August 14, 2023 Before Judges Messano and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … suspension of his driving privileges and thirty days of community service. The judge denied defendant's request for … his sentence was excessive. He raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I DEFENDANT'S RECORDED …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted February 28, 2023 – Decided July 28, 2023 Before Judges Messano, Gilson and Gummer. On appeal from the … of this appeal. 3 A-1028-19 Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT … cell phone, but he did not arrest defendant, who left after completing his statement. On December 8, 2015, Detective …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 6, 2024 – Decided December 2, 2024 Before Judges Firko and Augostini. On appeal from the Superior … his conviction and sentence and raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING FRESH COMPLAINT TESTIMONY. POINT II THE STATE AND COURT COERCED …