Filters
- A-4776-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4776-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … from her home in Delaware difficult. The Law Guardian supported the Division's application. L.A. objected. The … evidence all four prongs of the statutory test for the termination of parental rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a). …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3545-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … as did Mother. DCPP referred Mother to Ascenda Parent Support Services, but she was discharged in March 2023 after … 2023, DCPP filed a complaint in the Family Part seeking termination of Mother and Father's parental rights and …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3545-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … as did Mother. DCPP referred Mother to Ascenda Parent Support Services, but she was discharged in March 2023 after … 2023, DCPP filed a complaint in the Family Part seeking termination of Mother and Father's parental rights and …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4711-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … on the third prong, and his ultimate conclusion — that termination of defendant's parental rights is in the child's best interests — is supported by substantial credible evidence. See N.J. Div. of …
- A-4711-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4711-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … on the third prong, and his ultimate conclusion — that termination of defendant's parental rights is in the child's best interests — is supported by substantial credible evidence. See N.J. Div. of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1837-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and fourth prong, whether termination of … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the judge's decision to terminate Adam's parental …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1837-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and fourth prong, whether termination of … in favor of the guardianship petition overwhelmingly supports the judge's decision to terminate Adam's parental …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1066-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the order terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1066-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the order terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2924-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
- A-2924-16T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2924-16T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supported termination before the trial court and, on appeal, joins the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4598-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division in rendering its decision.2 The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- A-4598-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4598-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division in rendering its decision.2 The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1706-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the parental rights of Sarah and Greg to Ivan. In support of the judgment, the trial judge issued a … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and the fourth prong, whether termination of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1706-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the parental rights of Sarah and Greg to Ivan. In support of the judgment, the trial judge issued a … Division satisfied its burden to explore alternatives to termination, and the fourth prong, whether termination of …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1741-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … seeking the same relief as defendant.3 Mary's law guardian supported termination before the trial court 1 We use initials and …
- A-1741-18T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1741-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … seeking the same relief as defendant.3 Mary's law guardian supported termination before the trial court 1 We use initials and …
- njcourts.gov… NOS. A-1787-21 A-1788-21 A-2673-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. … She planned to get a part-time job and rely on Jeff for support as well, including having him watch the children. … 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and termination of Morgan and Jeff's parental rights was in …
- njcourts.gov… NOS. A-1787-21 A-1788-21 A-2673-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. … She planned to get a part-time job and rely on Jeff for support as well, including having him watch the children. … 30:4C-15.1(a) by clear and convincing evidence, and termination of Morgan and Jeff's parental rights was in …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4062-18T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … legal principles, and sufficient credible evidence supports its finding that the Division satisfied the best … to assert her parental rights while the Division sought termination. Daisy's initial placement occurred in March …