-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … action"'" (quoting Wallace[ v. Kato], 549 U.S. [384,] 388 [(2007)])); Reed v. Goertz, 598 U.S. 230, 235-36 (2023) … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0107-24.pdf … A-0107-24 – LAWRENCE DIGIESI VS. TOWNSHIP OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … R. 1:36-3. 2 A-0935-22 PER CURIAM The parties married in 2007, and Angelina, their only child, was born in 2011. The … no basis to disturb the court's order. Affirmed. … a0935-22.pdf … A-0935-22 – NATALYA UTLIK VS. GEORGE UTLIK …
-
njcourts.gov
… We recently reiterated that, "[a] Family Part judge is empowered to make an award of counsel fees to enable the … McGowan v. O'Rourke, 391 N.J. Super. 502, 507-08 (App. Div. 2007). Because she did not obtain an FRO, no provision … forty-five days. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1573-24.pdf … A-1573-24 – LAMA K. ALASSIL VS. MOHAMAD B. KHAIR …
-
njcourts.gov
… Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEM, INC. and CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, Defendants-Respondents. … acquired by National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-4 (NCSLT). Plaintiff failed to make the required … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1510-23.pdf … A-1510-23 – HEATHER VIEBROCK VS. TRANSWORLD SYSTEM, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … N.J. 189, 199 (2016). On March 29, 2022, Felder purchased a 2007 Saturn Aura from Carco Auto World. After making a … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1759-24.pdf … A-1759-24 – WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC VS. LATEESHA N. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Ibid. (quoting In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 482-83 (2007)). Further, appellate courts must "give due regard to … discussion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(D). Affirmed. … a3108-23.pdf … A-3108-23 – DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, BUREAU OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … & Co., L.L.P., 393 N.J. Super. 304, 313 (App. Div. 2007)). Claims of "attorney error, miscalculation, … granting judgment to defendant based on the SOL. … a3575-24.pdf … A-3575-24 – LEONIDAS PEREZ VS. RENTAL SHOP HOLDINGS, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Auth. v. Artaki, LLC, 392 N.J. Super. 141, 149 (App. Div. 2007)). II. We perceive no abuse of discretion in the … commission on sales. See N.J.S.A. 22A:4-8. … a3902-21.pdf … A-3902-21 – JAMES B. NUTTER AND COMPANY VS. MELVENE L. …
-
njcourts.gov
… issues. Unfortunately, the expert therapist originally appointed could not serve. Thereafter, the parties were not … (quoting Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 (App. Div. 2007))); R. 5:8-1. These factors can be appropriately … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1924-23.pdf … A-1924-23 – O.M. VS. R.T. AND E.T. (FD-03-0348-24, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … see also Pacifico v. Pacifico, 190 N.J. 258, 266 (2007) (holding "[a]s a general rule, courts should enforce … of their obligation under the rule. Affirmed. … a3561-22.pdf … A-3561-22 – VELOCITY INVESTMENTS LLC ASSIGNEE OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … his sentence is illegal: (1) an appeal from a January 8, 2007 decision denying his motion to correct an illegal … the corrected sentence on appeal. Affirmed. … a3433-22.pdf … A-3433-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TROY SWINT …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … in original) (quoting State v. Elders, 192 N.J. 224, 243 (2007)). We "defer[] to those findings in recognition of the … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0590-22.pdf … A-0590-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAMON GARY …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … fee." R.M. v. Supreme Court of N.J., 190 N.J. 1, 12 (2007) (alteration in original) (quoting Furst v. Einstein … remanded in part. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0794-21.pdf … A-0794-21 – MARLENE CARIDE, ETC. VS. MACAULAY G. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … the relevant factors. [In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 482-83 (2007) (quoting Mazza v. Bd. of Trs., 143 N.J. 22, 25 … capricious, or unreasonable. Affirmed. … a3772-20.pdf … A-3772-20 - IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN OTTERBINE, ETC. …
-
njcourts.gov
… the record as Elnagger. Although appellant's letter brief contains both spellings, this opinion reflects the correct … 182, 194 (2011) (quoting In re Carter, 191 N.J. 474, 483 (2007)). Our review is not designed "'to merely rubberstamp … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0113-21.pdf … A-0113-21 – ASHLEY ELNAGGAR VS. BOARD OF REVIEW, ETC. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … reclaim his land." Simon v. Cronecker, 189 N.J. 304, 319 (2007). As our Supreme Court recently reaffirmed, "the right … he is still unable to redeem. Affirmed. … a0763-21.pdf … A-0763-21 - GOLDSTAR ASSETS, LLC VS. JUAN GONZALEZ, ET …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 191 N.J. 88, 123 (2007)). The court did not abuse its discretion by denying … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a0546-22.pdf … A-0546-22 – PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION VS. ABIODUN O. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … State v. Brown, 394 N.J. Super. 492, 504 (App. Div. 2007)); see also N.J.S.A. 2C:25-18. Consequently, "[o]ur law … basis to disturb the June 9, 2022 FRO. Affirmed. … a3516-21.pdf … A-3516-21 - N.I. VS. L.M. (FV-02-2264-22, BERGEN …
-
njcourts.gov
… L. Hinkle, on the brief). 1 We use initials to protect the confidentiality of the parties. R. 1:38-3(d)(10). NOT FOR … of Youth and Family Services v. M.M., 189 N.J. 261, 278 (2007) (citing R. 2:5-4). We cannot conduct our review if the … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3626-21.pdf … A-3626-21 – R.A.M., III VS. R.O. (FV-04-3276-22, …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Co. of Newark v. Steiger, 395 N.J. Super. 109 (App. Div. 2007), we concluded that an expert—who provided a report in … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a2226-21.pdf … A-2226-21 – SIMON COULL VS. EISNER AMPER, ET AL. …