default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4551-19 PAUL G. GREENSTEIN, … Argued February 9, 2022 – Decided March 18, 2022 Before Judges Hoffman, Whipple and Geiger. On appeal from the … 2 A-4551-19 This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint filed in the Law Division because neither party …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-5844-17T1 A-1536-18T1 STATE OF NEW … Submitted November 13, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Currier. On appeal from the Superior … to Enter a Plea Agreement," which indicated the State recommended the minimum sentence for his DWI charge, and the …
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2719-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … Submitted December 5, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … care, custody and supervision of him. The Division filed a complaint under N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c) against Daniel alleging …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1944-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted October 8, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior … by counsel, they had a defense to the DWI charge and the outcome would, in all likelihood, have been different." Ibid. 5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4551-19 PAUL G. GREENSTEIN, … Argued February 9, 2022 – Decided March 18, 2022 Before Judges Hoffman, Whipple and Geiger. On appeal from the … 2 A-4551-19 This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint filed in the Law Division because neither party …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1046-17T1 ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., … Argued October 29, 2018 – Decided January 29, 2019 Before Judges Haas and Sumners. On appeal from Superior Court … to vacate the Law Division's prior order to reinstate the complaint against defendant. We affirm. In 2012, plaintiff, …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2719-18T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … Submitted December 5, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … care, custody and supervision of him. The Division filed a complaint under N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c) against Daniel alleging …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5550-14T1 IN THE MATTER OF STATE AND SCHOOL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSIONS' IMPLEMENTATION OF I/M/O PHILIP YUCHT. Argued telephonically July 13, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Simonelli and Carroll. On appeal from New Jersey …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4890-14T2 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND … Submitted November 17, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz and O'Connor. On appeal from New Jersey … from the May 12, 2015 final decision of the assistant commissioner of the Department of Children and Families, …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4299-16T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … Submitted February 26, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Messano and O'Connor. On appeal from Superior … father, but a paternity test established he is not and the complaint against him was dismissed. The mother contends the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1824-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted February 5, 2018 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Vernoia. On appeal from Superior … of his right to counsel and had obtained counsel, the outcome of the 1994 proceeding would have 4 A-1824-16T4 been …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5349-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … Submitted March 5, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino and Ostrer. On appeal from Superior … accordingly was vacated without prejudice, pending the outcome of the fact-finding hearing on remand. Id. at 6. The …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2642-17T3 CHERYL A. GALLO, … Argued January 23, 2019 – Decided February 15, 2019 Before Judges Hoffman and Firko. On appeal from Superior Court … This appeal emanates from defendant's claim that the second complaint was unnecessary and frivolous because he was …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NOS. A-5844-17T1 A-1536-18T1 STATE OF NEW … Submitted November 13, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Currier. On appeal from the Superior … to Enter a Plea Agreement," which indicated the State recommended the minimum sentence for his DWI charge, and the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1944-18T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted October 8, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Accurso and Gilson. On appeal from the Superior … by counsel, they had a defense to the DWI charge and the outcome would, in all likelihood, have been different." Ibid. 5 …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4699-15T3 MATTHEW CALAFIORE, … v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and COMPACT AUTO BODY, INC., Respondents-Respondents. … Submitted October 3, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes, Vernoia and Moynihan. On appeal from …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4191-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … Argued May 21, 2018 - Decided June 19, 2018 Before Judges Messano, Accurso and O'Connor. On appeal from … opinion. The Division claimed that defendant father I.B. committed an act of sexual abuse against his five-year-old …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1785-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD … Argued March 1, 2023 – Decided March 8, 2023 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … 217 N.J. at 552-53 (quoting Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995)). If the trial …
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … the Court. The Court considers whether, in this case, the “common knowledge” exception relieves plaintiffs of the … apply and an affidavit of merit was required. The Appellate Division reversed. 456 N.J. Super. 278, 292 (App. Div. …
-
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … the Court. The Court considers whether, in this case, the “common knowledge” exception relieves plaintiffs of the … apply and an affidavit of merit was required. The Appellate Division reversed. 456 N.J. Super. 278, 292 (App. Div. …