njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1035-18T4 ESTATE OF L.P., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. Submitted October 28, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3766-22 CRAIG BLACKMON, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _____________________ Argued September 10, 2025 – Decided September 23, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and …
-
njcourts.gov
… Our scope of review is very limited. Administrative decisions of the Board are "grounded in strong public policy … New Jersey Administrative Code, which provides: (a) Parole decisions shall be based on the aggregate of all pertinent …
-
njcourts.gov
… from the January 31, 20171 and April 27, 2017 final agency decisions of the Government Records Council (GRC), denying … to "an administrative oversight." In separate final agency decisions, the GRC upheld the City's denials of access to both of Simmons' requests. Common to both decisions, the GRC found the City failed to respond timely, …
-
njcourts.gov
… the court rejected the District’s reliance on two earlier decisions. Id. at ___ (slip op. at 18). The appellate court … workers under civil service law, as well as with numerous decisions over a span of decades that kept separate the … that have opted to become civil service districts. Numerous decisions over a span of decades kept separate the rights …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1035-18T4 ESTATE OF L.P., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent-Respondent. Submitted October 28, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5173-15T1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, SANDY RECOVERY DIVISION, Petitioner-Respondent, v. WILLIAM NOE, Respondent-Appellant. ___________________________________ Submitted October 1, 2018 – …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3766-22 CRAIG BLACKMON, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _____________________ Argued September 10, 2025 – Decided September 23, 2025 Before Judges Gooden Brown and …
njcourts.gov
… all relevant factors" when making custody status decisions. Rinck appealed. II. Our review of an … standards and principles that govern their discretionary decisions in as much detail as possible." Van Holten Group … are unable to give deference to the agency's discretionary decisions. In re Vey, 124 N.J. at 544 (citing Application of …
njcourts.gov
… We disagree. Our standard of review of administrative decisions by the Board is limited and "grounded in strong … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
njcourts.gov
… CAPRICIOUS, UNREASONABLE AND CONTRARY TO PRIOR COMMISSION DECISIONS. "The standard of review of a PERC decision … of Chosen Freeholders, 116 N.J. 322, 329 (1989)). PERC's decisions regarding negotiability are upheld unless … N.J. Super. 571, 582 (App. Div. 2014). In reviewing PERC decisions, our role is "sensitive and circumspect." …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0612-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEPHEN WALTON, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October 22, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Currier. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… We disagree. Our standard of review of administrative decisions by the Board is limited and "grounded in strong … Consequently, our courts "may overturn the Parole Board's decisions only if they are arbitrary and capricious." Ibid. …
-
njcourts.gov
… CAPRICIOUS, UNREASONABLE AND CONTRARY TO PRIOR COMMISSION DECISIONS. "The standard of review of a PERC decision … of Chosen Freeholders, 116 N.J. 322, 329 (1989)). PERC's decisions regarding negotiability are upheld unless … N.J. Super. 571, 582 (App. Div. 2014). In reviewing PERC decisions, our role is "sensitive and circumspect." …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0612-18T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEPHEN WALTON, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________ Submitted October 22, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Currier. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… all relevant factors" when making custody status decisions. Rinck appealed. II. Our review of an … standards and principles that govern their discretionary decisions in as much detail as possible." Van Holten Group … are unable to give deference to the agency's discretionary decisions. In re Vey, 124 N.J. at 544 (citing Application of …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2599-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE TENURE HEARING OF SHELIA SLAPPY, STATE OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY. Submitted October 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and …
-
njcourts.gov
Revised 01/23/2019, CN 10824 page 1 of 3 Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division Marie C. Hanley, Esq. Deputy Clerk – Case Processing Joseph H. Orlando, Esq. Clerk of the Appellate Division Stacy A. Fols, Esq. Director, Central Research Saul E. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2599-15T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE TENURE HEARING OF SHELIA SLAPPY, STATE OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY. Submitted October 25, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and …
-
A-42-23 Petition For Certification
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… one type of waiver being protected and the other not. The decisions are simply in tension, though In re NJDEP Denial does not acknowledge it.7 bad regulatory decisions will make the green goals of ISRA more expensive …