Filters
- A-3330-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3330-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … him. Nonetheless, the trial court rejected the Division's termination plan in February 2019, giving Kevin fresh … the record contains substantial and credible evidence to support the decision to terminate parental rights. Id. at …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5191-17T4 A-5192-17T41 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protect Hope. Tanya and Malcolm testified in opposition to termination of their parental rights. The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by substantial credible evidence and satisfied …
- A-5191-17T4 /A-5192-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-5191-17T4 A-5192-17T41 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … protect Hope. Tanya and Malcolm testified in opposition to termination of their parental rights. The trial court's judgment terminating parental rights was supported by substantial credible evidence and satisfied …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-3205-15T4 A-3206-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, V. … Following our review of the trial record, we find no support for defendants' claims of trial court error. … a long history with the Division, including the May 2012 termination of her parental rights to her then four-year-old …
- A-3205-15T4/A-3206-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-3205-15T4 A-3206-15T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, V. … Following our review of the trial record, we find no support for defendants' claims of trial court error. … a long history with the Division, including the May 2012 termination of her parental rights to her then four-year-old …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4778-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … statements by children does not extend to Title 30 termination cases. Id. at 230. Because the Family Part in … there is not adequate substantial and credible evidence to support the trial court's post- remand decision as to prongs …
- A-4778-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4778-17T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … statements by children does not extend to Title 30 termination cases. Id. at 230. Because the Family Part in … there is not adequate substantial and credible evidence to support the trial court's post- remand decision as to prongs …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3440-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … parents committed to adopting him—a plan his half-sister supported—and the court ultimately vacated the identified … Further, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The judge listed the …
- A-3440-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3440-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … parents committed to adopting him—a plan his half-sister supported—and the court ultimately vacated the identified … Further, the Division considered alternatives to the termination of parental rights. The judge listed the …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1779-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … MOTHER], THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS UNDER PRONG II [WERE] NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CREDIBLE AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We … to make legal decisions for the client before a judicial determination on her mental capacity"). Under Rule …
- A-1779-19T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1779-19T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … MOTHER], THE [JUDGE'S] FINDINGS UNDER PRONG II [WERE] NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CREDIBLE AND SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. We … to make legal decisions for the client before a judicial determination on her mental capacity"). Under Rule …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence under the applicable law sufficient to warrant termination of his parental rights. We disagree and affirm … relevant to the first prong dovetailed with his findings supporting the second prong, a common occurrence resulting …
- A-4390-16T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4390-16T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … evidence under the applicable law sufficient to warrant termination of his parental rights. We disagree and affirm … relevant to the first prong dovetailed with his findings supporting the second prong, a common occurrence resulting …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-2237-18T1 A-2238-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Mother argues: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE FAILED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD THAT [THE DIVISION] CONSIDERED …
- A-2237-18T1/A-2238-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-2237-18T1 A-2238-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Mother argues: POINT I THE TRIAL JUDGE FAILED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION SUPPORTED BY THE RECORD THAT [THE DIVISION] CONSIDERED …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3565-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Gambone opined Bea would not experience emotional harm from termination of Ann's parental rights because their limited … The trial court concluded efforts to provide services and support have failed, and "there is no realistic likelihood …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3565-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Gambone opined Bea would not experience emotional harm from termination of Ann's parental rights because their limited … The trial court concluded efforts to provide services and support have failed, and "there is no realistic likelihood …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1923-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … judgment terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1923-23 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … judgment terminating his parental rights. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. 1 We …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0735-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … NEITHER THE "TOXIC RELATIONSHIP" RELIED ON BY THE COURT TO SUPPORT PRONG ONE, NOR DR. LEE'S NET OPINION THAT DIVINA … THE TEMPORARY CAREGIVERS AS A BASIS FOR CONCLUDING THAT TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS WOULD NOT DO MORE HARM THAN …