-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … procedurally barred because "[d]efendant raised the same point in his prior PCR 3 A-1716-20 and motion for … rejected. The PCR judge did not err. Affirmed. … a1716-20.pdf … A-1716-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raises the following arguments on appeal: 5 A-0544-18T4 POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED IN FINDING DEFENDANT WAS NOT … April 20, 2018 memorandum of opinion. Affirmed. … a0544-18.pdf … A-0544-18T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … He appeals from the conviction, presenting the following point of argument concerning the suppression issue: POINT I … when they continued to question him. Affirmed. … a3850-15.pdf … A-3850-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… August 10, 2016 order denying his application to expunge a conviction. We reverse the order and remand for … On appeal petitioner raises the following issues: Point I: THE PROSECUTOR ERRONEOUSLY APPLIED THE STATUTE (The … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0788-16.pdf … A-0788-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 9, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman, O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … 27, 2014. This appeal followed. On appeal defendant argues, POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT FINDING A BRADY … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a3515-14.pdf … A-3515-14T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the following few comments. We reject defendant's first point because there can be no doubt that the act of shouting … a fair trial before an unbiased judge. Affirmed. … a1803-15.pdf … A-1803-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … their own expert fees, allocating the fees of the court appointed mediator, a forensic accountant, and directing … in her comprehensive oral decision. Affirmed. … a1308-15.pdf … A-1308-15T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … We add only a few comments. As to the first point, there is no question that plaintiff's claims of … for relief from the judge's order. Affirmed. … a3886-17.pdf … A-3886-17T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … hearing is not warranted. Before us, A.M. argues: POINT I: [A.M.]'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, PROTECTED UNDER THE … shall continue as parole conditions. Affirmed. … a3027-16.pdf … A-3027-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … This appeal followed. Defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED … by Judge Polansky in his oral opinion. Affirmed. … a1130-16.pdf … A-1130-16T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … argument to be abandoned. Plaintiffs have not briefed this point. Grubb v. Borough of Hightstown, 353 N.J. Super. 333, … appeal. Remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a4233-16.pdf … A-4233-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … of the plea] he was 'well.'" Defendant raises the following points on appeal: POINT I – TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS … an evidentiary hearing. 6 A-2296-20 Affirmed. … a2296-20.pdf … A-2296-20 - STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. M.E.A. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … presented to the Law Division. Defendant contends: POINT ONE THE PCR COURT ERRED IN DENYING [DEFENDANT] AN … than bald assertions to the contrary. Affirmed. … a0112-21.pdf … A-0112-21 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TRAVIS T. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … She raises the following arguments for our consideration: POINT ONE THERE WAS NOT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUSTAIN THE … documents. Avant, 67 N.J. 525-33. Affirmed. … a3631-21.pdf … A-3631-21 – NATALIE TICE VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … principles of law, we affirm. The parties were divorced in 2007. The Property Settlement Agreement required plaintiff … May and December 2015 orders. Affirmed. … a4996-14a2347-15.pdf … A-4996-14T4/A-2347-15T4 …
njcourts.gov
… a February 10, 2015 decision denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … hearing.1 Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT ONE: THE ORDER DENYING POST-CONVICTION RELIEF SHOULD … http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/directive/2011/dir_05_11.pdf. 3 A-4295-14T4 defendant agreed in writing to pay …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the judge again held for Piscataway and ordered the appointment of condemnation commissioners to determine the … in part. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a1380-14a1781-14.pdf … A-1380-14T3/A-1781-14T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… has limits. Specifically, Attorney General Grewal points to the first IAPP issued in 1991, which, while … and kept under lock and key in the IA unit, also empowered the police executive "to release publicly the … records … a3950-19a3975-19a3985-19a3987-19a4002-19.pdf … …
-
njcourts.gov
… also filed an unauthorized surreply (which was nonetheless considered). MEF did not respond to the unauthorized … Defendant mischaracterizes the facts and admissions on this point. 14 irrelevant because the arguments as to … by law. MEF’s motion is denied. 28 … cdvmassageenvy.pdf … ESX-L-3263-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… come before the Court upon the Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the April 12, 2023 Order Limiting the … in the future as too remote and speculative. Defendant points to the court's reliance upon Seaman v. U.S. Steel … a damage recovery is precluded. 5 … dentalhealthvgibbsboro.pdf … CAM-L-003993-20 - Dental Health Associates South …