Filters
- A-2757-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2757-16T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … The law guardian for each child joins the Division in support of the judgment. Having reviewed 1 We utilize … with services, the court approved the Division's plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. By that …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1608-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … child test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), justifying termination of Z.R.'s parental rights. We affirm. 1 We … relationship; (3) there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that the Division made …
- A-1608-20 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1608-20 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … child test set forth in N.J.S.A. 30:4C- 15.1(a), justifying termination of Z.R.'s parental rights. We affirm. 1 We … relationship; (3) there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that the Division made …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3835-19 A-3836-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proposed permanency plan for Caden, which included termination of Rachel's and Evan's parental rights followed … worker assigned to the adoption unit. The Law Guardian supported the Division's application to terminate both …
- A-3835-19/A-3836-19 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-3835-19 A-3836-19 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … proposed permanency plan for Caden, which included termination of Rachel's and Evan's parental rights followed … worker assigned to the adoption unit. The Law Guardian supported the Division's application to terminate both …
- D.Q. VS. F.Q. (FV-12-2404-21, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) - Unpublished Opinionsnjcourts.gov… 1 We use initials to refer to the parties and the minor child to protect their privacy and preserve the … (AFRO), which denied her application for sole custody and termination of defendant F.Q.'s parenting time, finding no … the disputed issues of custody, parenting time, and child support. The memorializing order provided the parties agreed …
- A-0950-22 – D.Q. VS. F.Q. (FV-12-2404-21, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) Opinionnjcourts.gov… 1 We use initials to refer to the parties and the minor child to protect their privacy and preserve the … (AFRO), which denied her application for sole custody and termination of defendant F.Q.'s parenting time, finding no … the disputed issues of custody, parenting time, and child support. The memorializing order provided the parties agreed …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5016-18 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … home he had known. 15 A-5016-18 They each opined that termination of Alan's relationship with Dana would cause … to the[m]." He opined that "[t]he totality of the data supports [the] plan to pursue termination of parental rights …
- A-5016-18 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5016-18 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … home he had known. 15 A-5016-18 They each opined that termination of Alan's relationship with Dana would cause … to the[m]." He opined that "[t]he totality of the data supports [the] plan to pursue termination of parental rights …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3318-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division met its burden to consider alternatives to termination, citing the Division's initial plan of … court's termination of parental rights so long as they are "supported by 'substantial and credible evidence' on the …
- A-3318-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3318-17T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … the Division met its burden to consider alternatives to termination, citing the Division's initial plan of … court's termination of parental rights so long as they are "supported by 'substantial and credible evidence' on the …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4736-15T2 A-4739-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … only consider the arguments raised by defendants as to the termination of their parental rights to Kathy. In addition … her arguments regarding the insufficiency of the evidence supporting termination. She also contends that the remand …
- A-4736-15T2/A-4739-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NO. A-4736-15T2 A-4739-15T2 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … only consider the arguments raised by defendants as to the termination of their parental rights to Kathy. In addition … her arguments regarding the insufficiency of the evidence supporting termination. She also contends that the remand …
- njcourts.gov… aggravated sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child in 1999. In 2000 and 2001, he was adjudicated … that J.A. does not pose a safety threat, he is eligible for termination of his Megan’s Law obligations under subsection … that J.A. does not pose a safety threat, he is eligible for termination of his Megan’s Law obligations under subsection …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." E.P., 196 N.J. at 104. We … "owe no special deference to the trial [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
- A-0796-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." E.P., 196 N.J. at 104. We … "owe no special deference to the trial [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0796-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." E.P., 196 N.J. at 104. We … "owe no special deference to the trial [court's] legal determinations." Slawinski v. Nicholas, 448 N.J. Super. 25, 32 …
- njcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4590-18T1 A-4591-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … issues, the court found that the Division proved that termination of parental rights was in the best interests of … suggest a poor prognosis for reunification." Dr. Freedman supported termination of parental rights. Defense …
- A-4590-18T1/A-4591-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… DOCKET NOS. A-4590-18T1 A-4591-18T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … issues, the court found that the Division proved that termination of parental rights was in the best interests of … suggest a poor prognosis for reunification." Dr. Freedman supported termination of parental rights. Defense …
- njcourts.gov… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0764-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … by clear and convincing evidence. The Law Guardian supports the termination on appeal as it did before the trial court. …