-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … opportunity to participate. I. Sutton raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE HEARING OFFICER'S … and remand. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a0813-18.pdf … A-0813-18T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … brief, defendant forwards the following additional claims: POINT I THE PCR COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO ADDRESS THE … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a4704-17.pdf … A-4704-17T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … factors. On appeal, defendant raises the following points: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO INSTURCT … and satisfied on December 31, 2012. Affirmed. … a5771-14.pdf … A-5771-14T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 17, 2016 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New … presents the following issues for our consideration: POINT I – THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE … written opinion. See R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0674-14.pdf … A-0674-14T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM Convicted by a jury of first-degree robbery and a weapons … hearing. Defendant appealed, raising a single issue: POINT ONE DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO POST-CONVICTION RELIEF … v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608, 687 (1984). … a5128-15.pdf … A-5128-15T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the following issues for our consideration in his appeal. POINT I DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). … a3999-15.pdf … A-3999-15T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … Case law is very clear on that." Moreover, the court pointed out that defendant did not claim that there was "a … time bar." J.K., 407 N.J. Super. at 19 n.2. … a2375-16.pdf … A-2375-16T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … makes two arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – DEFENDANT'S PCR PETITION SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TIME … Super. 154, 171 (App. Div. 1999)). Affirmed. … a3764-19.pdf … A-3764-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … final agency decision. He raises the following arguments: POINT I. The Final Administrative Decision is a standard … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3172-19.pdf … A-3172-19 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … followed. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE PCR COURT SHOULD HAVE HELD THAT DEFENDANT'S … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0737-18.pdf … A-0737-18 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … defendant raises the following arguments in this appeal. POINT I PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO POST- CONVICTION RELIEF … denying defendant's PCR petition. Affirmed. … a0376-18.pdf … A-0376-18T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … the victim to tell the truth. Defendant argues on appeal: POINT I: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT APPLIED THE … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a5048-16.pdf … A-5048-16T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… A-1112-17T1 ANTHONY DANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGH POINT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Superintendent SCOTT D. RIPLEY, … APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … properly dismissed the complaints. Affirmed. … a1112-17.pdf … A-1112-17T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … physically assaulted her on July 19, 2012. At that point, J.M. was fourteen years old. J.M. testified that the … inclusion of material outside of the record). … a2938-15.pdf … A-2938-15T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… from a March 2, 2017 order denying his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE … makes four arguments, which he articulates as follows: POINT I – THE DEFENDANT DID NOT WAIVE HIS RIGHTS KNOWINGLY; … did not present a prima facie showing. Affirmed. … a3634-16.pdf … A-3634-16T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… and ATLANTIC PAVING (& COATING), LLC; JOE ROSARIO & ROSARIO CONTRACTING CORP., d/b/a ROSARIO MAZZA DEMOLITION AND … appeal followed. Plaintiff raises the following arguments: Point I The trial court erred in precluding plaintiff from … of the trial should not be set aside. Affirmed. … a4973-14.pdf … A-4973-14T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Before us, defendant presents the following arguments: POINT I N.J.S.A. [] 2C:11-3(b)(1), AND THE DECISION IN STATE … of his child, was especially vicious. Affirmed. … a0287-24.pdf … A-0287-24 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RASHON JONES …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … N.J. 359 (2022). In his moving papers, defendant sought appointment of counsel to expound upon the issues raised. On … without assignment of counsel. Affirmed. … a2808-22.pdf … A-2808-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FREDERICK …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … In his moving brief and reply brief, Ali-X argues: POINT I [THE DEPARTMENT] IN ABUSE OF AUTHORITY RECKLESSLY … opinion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(1)(D) and (E). Affirmed. … a3546-22.pdf … A-3546-22 – KASEEM ALI-X VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … appeal follows. Defendant raises the following arguments. POINT I DEJESUS SHOULD BE RESENTENCED BECAUSE THE SENTENCING … this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2641-20.pdf … A-2641-20 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANDY J. DEJESUS …