-
njcourts.gov
… SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY 1. On January 17, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed 787,764 unresolved, minor municipal court complaints in which an arrest warrant for the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Messano and Espinosa. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Indictment … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… et al Plaintiff Vs. MERCK & CO., INC., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY FOSAMAX … NO. 282 ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon motion by Fox Rothschild LLP, attorney for … was dismissed without prejudice on April 28, 2023, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …
-
njcourts.gov
… for Plaintiff(s) IN RE ZOSTAVAX LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION – MIDDLESEX COUNTY MCL NO.: … notice to all interested parties, have moved before this Court to vacate the Court’s February 13, 2020 Orders dismissing Plaintiffs’ …
-
njcourts.gov
… via Directive #04-19 (05/15/2019), CN 12441 Superior Court of New Jersey Division Plaintiff(s), County v. Docket … , attorney for , for an Order to Correct the entered into eCourts incorrectly upon the filing of a on and bearing … , “ ” be replaced with “ ” in the appropriate Electronic Court System(s), AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of …
-
njcourts.gov
… and Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. MARIAN JONES, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET … Defendants. THIS MATTER, having been brought before the Court upon motion by Blank Rome LLP, attorneys for … pursuant to R. 4:23- 5(a)(2). On February 3, 2023, this Court dismissed the claims against Actavis without prejudice …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET … ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon motion by Fox Rothschild LLP, attorney for … dismissed without prejudice on February 13, 2022, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …
-
njcourts.gov
… INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Defendants. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET … ORDER THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court upon motion by Fox Rothschild LLP, attorney for … dismissed without prejudice on February 13, 2022, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …
-
njcourts.gov
… Corporation THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., attorneys for Defendant … Corporation (“NPC”), for an Order, pursuant to the Court’s May 12, 2023 Order and Rule 4:23-2(b), dismissing … was dismissed without prejudice on May 12, 2023, and the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0007-21 … Judges Currier and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
-
njcourts.gov
… Syllabus BATSON v. KENTUCKY CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY No. 84-6263. Argued December 12, … 30, 1986 During the criminal trial in a Kentucky state court of petitioner, a black man, the judge conducted voir … tioner. Affirming the conviction, the Kentucky Supreme Court ob- served that recently, in another case, it had …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3253-23 … Judges Gummer and Jacobs. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Morris County, Docket No. … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2150-20 … Judges Messano and Gummer. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3305-22 … Firko and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Somerset County, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
default
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, Docket No. … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Camden … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Currier and Geiger. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Before Judges Espinosa and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Yannotti and Mawla. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Indictment … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. … Judges Alvarez and Suter. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, … shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion …