njcourts.gov
… Argued March 18, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Augostini. On appeal from … 2C:43-6(c) or (g), Graves Act; and (4) N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.26, Sexually Violent Predator Act. Eligibility is also … were unknown. Thereafter, Parole Officer Peter Degnan was informed that Martin had not resided at the approved residence …
-
njcourts.gov
… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Submitted April 4, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Reisner, Koblitz and Sumners. On appeal from the … standard for actionable hostile work environment sexual harassment). [Id. at 402-03.] This case presents an …
-
njcourts.gov
… October 24, 2019 – Decided November 18, 2019 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Mawla. On appeal from the … brief and appendix were muddled and lacking in procedural formalities designed for appellate review. We have dismissed … to indigent persons subject to civil commitment under the Sexually Violent Predator Act, N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.25, where …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 13, 2022 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … mouth. Jitan stated he did not use any of the videos for sexual gratification. In response, the lead detective … photographs and videos he reviewed. He also stated that information extracted from Jitan's devices showed that he made …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 6, 2019 – Decided May 7, 2019 Before Judges Koblitz, Currier, and Mayer. On appeal from … the cause pro se. Stephen T. Bissell argued the cause for respondents (Rebar Bernstiel, attorneys; Cathleen Kelly … Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213; and sexual harassment. EEO's investigations found the …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted April 26, 2021 – Decided May 18, 2021 Before Judges Mayer and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … No. FM-12-1223-18. Garces, Grabler & Lebrocq, PC, attorneys for appellant (Arlindo B. Araujo, on the briefs). Marlo J. … fraud for setting aside a final judgment of divorce. 4 The sexual orientation of any individual with whom defendant may …
-
njcourts.gov
… LA SAMMANA MANAGEMENT, LLC, and BA MANAGEMENT, LLC, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … breaches of the duty of loyalty, fraud, malpractice, and sexual harassment. In 2005, Kaye sued Rosefielde in Atlantic … public interest exception to the mootness doctrine. If the former, Kaye was entitled to a disgorgement hearing. But if …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted January 14, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sabatino, Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from … Family Part, Essex County, Docket No. FG-07-0188-17. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … We affirm. I. The record shows the mother was sexually abused as a child. She has been diagnosed with …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted November 28, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Mayer. On appeal from the Board of … she was unsure Medina could be trusted with workplace information. The general manager also suggested Medina act … N.J. Super. 241, 246 (App. Div. 1985). In Doering, we held sexual harassment and racially prejudicial and gender biased …
-
njcourts.gov
… Submitted August 21, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and Gilson. On appeal from the New … E.J., who charged Manso with prohibited acts .052 (making sexual proposals or threats to another) and .709 (failure to … violations. His counsel substitute contended that the information in the letter was "not true[,]" and requested …
-
njcourts.gov
… Jurors. …no change (b) Challenges in the Array; Challenges for Cause. Any party may challenge the array in writing on … completed by prospective jurors, and individual juror information maintained by the Judiciary[,]; and [preliminary] … nationality, or ancestry; sex, pregnancy, or breastfeeding; sexual orientation; gender 9 identity or expression; …
-
njcourts.gov
… Jurors. …no change (b) Challenges in the Array; Challenges for Cause. Any party may challenge the array in writing on … completed by prospective jurors, and individual juror information maintained by the Judiciary[,]; and [preliminary] … nationality, or ancestry; sex, pregnancy, or breastfeeding; sexual orientation; gender 9 identity or expression; …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 13, 2022 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … mouth. Jitan stated he did not use any of the videos for sexual gratification. In response, the lead detective … photographs and videos he reviewed. He also stated that information extracted from Jitan's devices showed that he made …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 6, 2022 – Decided October 13, 2022 Before Judges Haas and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … mouth. Jitan stated he did not use any of the videos for sexual gratification. In response, the lead detective … photographs and videos he reviewed. He also stated that information extracted from Jitan's devices showed that he made …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued October 16, 2023 — Decided October 25, 2023 Before Judges Mawla, Chase, and Vinci. On appeal from the New … Jersey Commissioner of Education, Docket No. 234-9/19. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Bd. of Educ., 155 N.J. Super. 358 (App. Div. 1978) (sexually discriminatory leave policy); Decker v. Elizabeth …
-
njcourts.gov
… Argued March 18, 2025 – Decided July 17, 2025 Before Judges Bishop-Thompson and Augostini. On appeal from … 2C:43-6(c) or (g), Graves Act; and (4) N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.26, Sexually Violent Predator Act. Eligibility is also … were unknown. Thereafter, Parole Officer Peter Degnan was informed that Martin had not resided at the approved residence …
njcourts.gov
… Submitted March 12, 2024 – Decided April 16, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … the State's photograph of weapons at trial , and for not informing defendant of a plea offer. The court rejected these … test requires a petitioner to establish counsel's performance was deficient. Preciose, 129 N.J. at 463. "The …
njcourts.gov
… Argued July 30, 2024 – Decided November 1, 2024 Before Judges Sumners and Walcott-Henderson. On appeal from … argued the cause pro se. Andrew J. Ball argued the cause for respondent (Davison Eastman Muñoz Paone, PA, attorneys; … take 740 hours to review the footage and redact sensitive information before release. Based on his $29 hourly rate, the …
default
… Submitted February 6, 2019 – Decided July 31, 2019 Before Judges Fuentes and Moynihan. On appeal from the … 15-02- 0089. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Tamar Yael Lerer, Assistant Deputy Public … When the officers obtained defendant's pedigree information to 3 A-1874-17T4 issue him a summons for this …
default
… Respondent. Submitted January 16, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Koblitz, Currier, and Mayer. On appeal from the … under "reasons for sanction," the hearing officer informed that Roundtree did not participate calmly in the … considered in the imposition of sanctions, so we may perform our review of "whether a sanction is imposed for …