-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … because defendant "fail[ed] to show any prejudice," as he pointed to "nothing in the record that would undermine the … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0535-23.pdf … A-0535-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SONNY SHRIEVES …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … weapon; and six counts of fourth-degree aggravated assault, pointing a firearm, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(b)(4). He was subject … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0582-23.pdf … A-0582-23 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RHUDELL C. …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … Holzworth "testified inconsistently . . . at various points . . . during the trial, as to whether . . . he … a written opinion. R. 2:11- 3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a0778-22.pdf … A-0778-22 – STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSEPH ZACCARINO …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … in the alternative, that the trial court erred by not appointing the resource parents as the child's kinship legal … the Supreme Court from our decision. Affirmed. … a3783-21.pdf … A-3783-21 – DCPP VS. D.S.-S.R. AND M.M., IN THE MATTER …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … home. He also testified plaintiff had mentioned at some point "via the girls" about dropping off Ellen's retainer, … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a2221-21.pdf … A-2221-21 – K.G. VS R.G. (FV-08-1118-22, GLOUCESTER …
njcourts.gov › attorneys › administrative directives
… Officer Program September 7, 2010 Page 2 of 11 Questions concerning this Directive may be directed to Harry T. … standards are set forth in the Domestic Violence Procedures Manual (“DVPM”) jointly promulgated by the Supreme Court and … State. II. Standards -- DVHO Program DVHO Standard # 1: Appointment DVHOs shall be hired at the vicinage level in the …
-
#09-10
Administrative Directives
njcourts.gov
… Officer Program September 7, 2010 Page 2 of 11 Questions concerning this Directive may be directed to Harry T. … standards are set forth in the Domestic Violence Procedures Manual (“DVPM”) jointly promulgated by the Supreme Court and … State. II. Standards -- DVHO Program DVHO Standard # 1: Appointment DVHOs shall be hired at the vicinage level in the …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … assigned to the members of Class A became the focal point of contention when Mark and Anthony were apprised of … 24 A-3461-14T3 3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a3461-14a3550-14.pdf … A-3461-14T3/A-3550-14T3 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … affirm. On appeal, Wright raises the following arguments. POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY … the sound exercise of discretion. Affirmed. … a1917-16.pdf … A-1917-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … See also N.J.A.C. 17:4-6.11. Before us, Thompson contends: POINT I N.J.S.A. 43:16A-5(3) DOES NOT REQUIRE, AS A … 458 N.J. Super. 47 (App. Div. 2019). Affirmed. … a2661-17.pdf … A-2661-17T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … fees and costs. Defendant appeals, arguing in his first point that plaintiff "did not perform in accordance with the … thoughtful and cogent oral decision. Affirmed. … a3095-20.pdf … A-3095-20 – STEPHEN A. NORTH VS. ANTHONY EMPOSIMATO …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … had begun. Both defendants raise the latter two points. We also reject defendants' respective challenges to … jointly "if they are alleged to have … a1021-14a1343-14.pdf … A-1021-14T2/A-1343-14T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … 3 A-3250-20 POINT I THE ACRIMONY IN THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE USED BY THE … written opinion. See R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a3250-20.pdf … A-3250-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… V. Molitor, Designated Counsel, on the brief). Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent … II. On appeal, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2053-20.pdf … A-2053-20 …
-
njcourts.gov
… the above referenced property (Subject). Plaintiff’s owner contends that the signature on the return receipt (commonly … of the assessment. Ibid., Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Borough of Point Pleasant, 112 N.J. 1 (1988). Since the loss of appeal … /s/ Mala Sundar Hon. Mala Sundar, P.J.T.C. … 006452-2021opn.pdf … 006452-2021 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … this record, defendant raises the following arguments: POINT I THE COURT ERRED BY DENYING THE PTI APPEAL MOTION … and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. … a2999-16.pdf … A-2999-16T1 …
-
njcourts.gov
… 2015 order of the court denying his application for post-conviction relief (PCR) without NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT … Defendant now appeals, raising the following issues: POINT I: THE PCR COURT ERRED WHERE IT FOUND THE DEFENDANT … in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). Affirmed. … a5001-14.pdf … A-5001-14T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… the brief). PER CURIAM In a bifurcated trial, defendant was convicted of second- degree unlawful possession of a … of parole ineligibility. Defendant presents the following points on appeal: POINT I BECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO PROVE … was decided after the sentencing in this case. … a3141-15.pdf … A-3141-15T4 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." … raise the following arguments for our consideration: POINT I THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING … a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). Affirmed. … a1368-19.pdf … A-1368-19T2 …
-
njcourts.gov
… APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although … misconduct; (4) malicious prosecution; and (5) any other points assigned counsel deems relevant. The court assigned … reasons expressed by the PCR court. Affirmed. … a3635-15.pdf … A-3635-15T3 …