Filters
- A-2855-21 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued September 29, 2022 – Decided October 25, 2022 Before Judges Haas and Gooden Brown. On appeal from an … THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF [DEFENDANT'S] GUILT UNDER THE ACCOMPLICE-LIABILITY THEORY THE STATE EXPLICITLY TOLD THE … the Applicable Law to the Grand Jury and Its Inclusion of Accomplice Liability in the Indictment, It Could Not Retreat …
- A-5193-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted September 11, 2019 - Decided Before Judges Koblitz and Gooden Brown. On appeal from the … they arrived, defendant insisted that S.D. and her brother come inside. Defendant knocked on the door and another man … attitude in open court." A. Opening Statement Defendant points to trial counsel's failure to provide an opening …
- A-3802-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted February 14, 2019 – Decided Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple. On appeal from the … In addition, defendant's front headlight assembly was "completely out." During the course of the motor vehicle … 39:3-60. II On appeal, defendant asserts the following points for our consideration:4 POINT I: THE SUPERIOR COURT, …
- A-3558-17T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted March 23, 2020 – Decided May 27, 2020 Before Judges Ostrer and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior … to allow his claim that the State's plea offer was not communicated to him. In June 2017, a new PCR judge heard … agreement and, if so, whether counsel had failed to communicate that plea of fer to defendant. In November 2017, …
- A-0461-18T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… telephonically March 19, 2020 – Decided April 29, 2020 Before Judges Suter and DeAlmeida. On appeal from the New … of his medical records. 3 A-0461-18T4 respond to communications regarding her father's medical care. Deptford … On July 5, 2018, ALJ Olgiati issued an initial decision recommending the denial of benefits be affirmed. The ALJ …
- A-2158-15T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS RE-INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________ … Re-Insurance Company (NJMRe), appeals, raising numerous points of evidentiary error. We reject all but one. We agree … any changes in plaintiff's condition. The court may also revisit the limitations it imposed on plaintiff's orthopedist …
- A-2057-17T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted December 18, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Whipple, Gooden Brown, and Mawla. On appeal from … following issues on appeal: POINT I: THE STATE'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH [RULE] 3:13-3(b) REGARDING PRODUCING TRANSCRIPTS … ARREST SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED. POINT III: CERTAIN COMMENTS MADE BY THE PROSECUTOR DURING HIS SUMMATION [WERE] …
- A-1342-17T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued January 22, 2019 – Decided May 6, 2019 Before Judges Haas, Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … to the Division's Enrollment Bureau questioning Newark's compliance with the pension statutes regarding the … a year later, on May 29, 2015, NFU filed a Superior Court complaint against Newark and the Division. The complaint …
- A-4489-16T4 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted February 6, 2019 – Decided July 8, 2019 Before Judges Nugent and Reisner. On appeal from the Superior … a new trial and a lesser sentence. He argues the following points: POINT I THE COURT'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE IDENTIFICATION INSTRUCTION DENIED DEFENDANT HIS …
- A-3139-17T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued May 13, 2019 – Decided July 3, 2019 Before Judges Messano and Rose. On appeal from the Superior … 19, 2017 final binding award of the arbitrator and his accompanying written decision. On November 14, 2017, a Family … award. On appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE PROCEDURAL AND …
- A-4421-16T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued February 27, 2019 – Decided June 13, 2019 Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia and Moynihan. On appeal from … address, phone number and social security number; defendant complied. The officer also asked defendant "if she knew … her. He did not limit her movement; in fact, defendant felt comfortable enough to get up from the bench. The officer did …
- A-3028-18T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted January 13, 2020 – Decided Before Judges Fasciale and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … which transferred counts three through eight of its amended complaint to the Law Division. It also appeals a January 30, … the orders under review. Plaintiff raises the following points for this court's consideration: 4 A-3028-18T2 POINT I …
- A-3648-18T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted May 4, 2020 – Decided July 17, 2020 Before Judges Moynihan and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the … began in 2008, and in 2012, plaintiff was awarded rental income, his attorney was awarded fees, and the parties agreed … Laskin in June 2010, where plaintiff agreed to dismiss his complaint, and the parties agreed to dissolve the …
- ESX-L-4107-11 Opinionnjcourts.gov… NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON … still receive higher compensation. Additionally, plaintiff points to the fact that “[p]laintiff was passed over for Ms. …
- A-2753-15T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Argued February 14, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Espinosa. On appeal from Superior … PER CURIAM Plaintiff Moretran Realty, LLC, purchased commercial real estate property (the Property) from … they lack merit and further, the arguments raised in Points II and III require no discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). …
- A-3024-14T3 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted September 21, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Fuentes and Simonelli. On appeal from the … second degree possession of a firearm in the course of committing a drug offense, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-4.1a; and third … to dismiss the remaining counts of the indictment and recommend the court sentence defendant to an aggregate term of …
- A-2400-15T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted May 10, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Hoffman and Whipple. On appeal from Superior … the suppression record and the applicable law, we are compelled to reverse. I. We discern the following facts from … card, which he confirmed was expired. Defendant said he was coming from a party; he denied any prior arrests, but a …
- A-4154-15T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted June 8, 2017 – Decided Before Judges Lihotz and Hoffman. On appeal from Superior … I. Defendant's convictions arose from a home break-in he committed in Edison on the night of November 30, 2014; at … This appeal followed. Defendant now presents the following points of argument:1 POINT I THERE IS NO FACTUAL BASIS TO …
- A-1204-14T2 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Submitted September 14, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Messano and Espinosa. On appeal from Superior … TO PTI ADMISSION. 3 A-1204-14T2 POINT II THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN ALLOWING THE STATE TO … A. "[A]cceptance into PTI is dependent upon an initial recommendation by the Criminal Division Manager and consent of …
- A-4273-13T1 Opinionnjcourts.gov… Defendant-Appellant. Submitted October 6, 2016 – Decided Before Judges Alvarez and Accurso. On appeal from the Superior … driver. Defendant's childhood friend, an employee of the company for which defendant worked and the person who had … Now on appeal, defendant raises the following points for our consideration: POINT I THE PROSECUTOR'S …