-
njcourts.gov
… be granted only if they fall into the narrow corridor of decisions based on plainly incorrect reasoning, failures to …
-
njcourts.gov
… We afford "[w]ide discretion . . . to administrative decisions because of an agency's specialized knowledge." In …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2460-21 MICHAEL DARBY, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. _____________________________ Submitted May 30, 2023 – Decided June 22, 2023 Before Judges Whipple and …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3460-20 SAND PIT VOLLEYBALL, LLC, Appellant, v. FORT MONMOUTH ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AUTHORITY, Respondent. ______________________________ Submitted November 28, 2022 – Decided April 12, 2023 …
njcourts.gov
… Division of Aging Services" in the ALJ's and director's decisions. 3 A-0886-21 costs of necessary medical services." … raised in the complaint in compliance with the orders and decisions" of the Mercer County judge. In a January 23, 2020 … raised in the complaint in compliance with the orders and decisions" of the Superior Court judge. Accordingly, all of …
njcourts.gov
… heads "reviewed their budgets" and made 25 A-0066-18 decisions "as to . . . maybe we could consolidate some of …
-
njcourts.gov
… heads "reviewed their budgets" and made 25 A-0066-18 decisions "as to . . . maybe we could consolidate some of …
-
njcourts.gov
… Division of Aging Services" in the ALJ's and director's decisions. 3 A-0886-21 costs of necessary medical services." … raised in the complaint in compliance with the orders and decisions" of the Mercer County judge. In a January 23, 2020 … raised in the complaint in compliance with the orders and decisions" of the Superior Court judge. Accordingly, all of …
-
A-2570-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… STATEMENT The instant matter is an appeal of two decisions by Respondent, New Jersey Department of … and the reasons set forth in detail below, the NJDEP’s decisions were arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, … not based on substantial credible evidence. As such, these decisions should be reversed. II. THE NJDEP’S DENIAL OF …
-
A-1826-23 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Interpretations are Consistent with the Federal Courts’ Decisions. (As to Legislative History, Pa49) … Pa65 UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS CITED BELOW [R. 2:6-1(a)(1)(H)] Unpublished decisions cited below by Plaintiff: Ali v. Credit Corp. …
-
A-3463-22 Briefs
Briefs
njcourts.gov
… Interpretations are Consistent with the Federal Courts’ Decisions. (As to Legislative History, Pa35) … Pa49 UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS CITED BELOW [R. 2:6-1(a)(1)(H)] Decisions cited below by Plaintiff: Ali v. Credit Corp. …
njcourts.gov
… of fact and conclusions" from the two prior initial decisions, and determined that "at the time of filing and …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0007-17T1 TRAP-ZAP ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and CHRISTOPHER OH, Respondents. __________________________________ Submitted December 11, 2018 – …
njcourts.gov
… asking: "Can you please let me know when the [Board's] decisions were published in the newspaper?" The Board's … actions in lieu of prerogative writs to review zoning board decisions within "[forty-five] days from the publication of …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4761-17T2 MR. Y. PARK AND LYDIA PARK, d/b/a PARK CLEAN MACHINE INC. and Z-ZONE OUTLET INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LINDENWOLD CENTER, LLC, Defendant-Respondent. ______________________________ …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0050-19T3 SABRINE KASTRATI and SAM KASTRATI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PREMIER ENDOSCOPY, LLC, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted April 22, 2020 – Decided May 7, 2020 …
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2555-20 KAITLYN SHEEDY, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ULTA SALON, COSMETIC & FRAGRANCE, INC., Respondents. ___________________________ Submitted June 8, 2022 – Decided …
njcourts.gov
… on “substantial evidence” and whether its discretionary decisions are “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.” Id. …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2555-20 KAITLYN SHEEDY, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ULTA SALON, COSMETIC & FRAGRANCE, INC., Respondents. ___________________________ Submitted June 8, 2022 – Decided …
-
njcourts.gov
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0050-19T3 SABRINE KASTRATI and SAM KASTRATI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PREMIER ENDOSCOPY, LLC, Defendant-Respondent. ___________________________ Submitted April 22, 2020 – Decided May 7, 2020 …