-
njcourts.gov
… NOT TO BE PUBLISHED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION BERGEN COUNTY DOCKET NO. BER-L-4328-16 CIVIL ACTION … Honorable Robert C. Wilson, J.S.C. Jed Marcus, Esq. counsel for the Defendants Anwar Master and Walter Beringer (from …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … the Court’s reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division is based substantially on the reasons expressed in … than occurred in this case and, in addition, he would recommend that the Criminal Practice Committee adopt an …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4480-19 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted November 18, 2021 – Decided December 3, 2021 Before Judges Haas and Mitterhoff. On appeal from the Superior … in court, and elected to represent himself. Before trial commenced, the judge rejected defendant's protestations that …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4023-19 MARVIN HOWARD, … Submitted April 19, 2021 – Decided September 8, 2021 Before Judges Suter and Smith. On appeal from the Superior … entry of a default and dismissing plaintiff's Law Division complaint with prejudice, and from an April 21, 2020 order …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3286-19T2 S.W., Plaintiff-Respondent, … own findings that the parties spent the entirety of their income, and resulted in plaintiff receiving a lopsided share … marriage. Id. at 532-33. Because we directed the judge to revisit the alimony calculation, we also instructed he revisit …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0355-17T1 ANTHONY VALVANO, … Submitted January 22, 2019 – Decided Before Judges Sumners and Mitterhoff. On appeal from Superior … and control the business, affairs, and operations of the Company[.]" 1 Kramer, Smith, and Torres asserted the …
-
njcourts.gov
… RECORD IMPOUNDED SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3656-16T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Submitted October 16, 2018 – Decided Before Judges Yannotti and Natali. On appeal from Superior … Abuse Research Education and Service Institute, conducted a comprehensive 1 The Division is now known as the Division of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2758-22 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, … Argued September 19, 2024 – Decided October 1, 2024 Before Judges Mawla, Natali, and Vinci. On appeal from the … Law Division's March 30, 2023 order dismissing plaintiff's complaint against it with prejudice, essentially arguing the …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0271-22 THE LAW OFFICE OF RAJEH A. … Argued October 11, 2023 – Decided December 11, 2023 Before Judges DeAlmeida and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from … arbitration. In October 2019, the district fee arbitration committee issued an arbitration determination requiring …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0660-21 GALLERIA CONSTRUCTION, INC., … Submitted October 31, 2022 – Decided January 3, 2023 Before Judges Currier and Bishop-Thompson. On appeal from the … to submit a site plan regarding a change of use of its commercial property in contravention of Kingwood Township …
njcourts.gov
… to disclose Machuca on her application. CURE then filed a complaint. It sought a declaratory judgment, including a … law. CURE appealed, and, in a split decision, the Appellate Division affirmed. 432 N.J. Super. 526 (App. Div. 2013). The … Noting that the Legislature might wish to consider revisiting the issue, the Appellate Division majority …
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … Defendant’s answer denied the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint and further contended that, because defendant is … failure to serve an AOM, which was granted. The Appellate Division reversed, determining that an AOM is not required …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2643-21 SYLVIA MELANIA TEJADA DE … BII CORP., a/k/a B2 CORP., CHST OF NJ, LLC, Defendants, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant- Respondent. …
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0255-15T3 ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., … agent of ALEX PRODUCE CORP.; HEE JAE PARK d/b/a J&S PRODUCE COMPANY; LUIS JOSE BONILLA d/b/a LUIS JOSE PRODUCE; ZEF … 24 A-0255-15T3 Procedurally, where a judge is inclined to revisit a prior interlocutory order, what is critical is that …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0255-15T3 ALLIANCE SHIPPERS, INC., … agent of ALEX PRODUCE CORP.; HEE JAE PARK d/b/a J&S PRODUCE COMPANY; LUIS JOSE BONILLA d/b/a LUIS JOSE PRODUCE; ZEF … 24 A-0255-15T3 Procedurally, where a judge is inclined to revisit a prior interlocutory order, what is critical is that …
-
njcourts.gov
… opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … Defendant’s answer denied the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint and further contended that, because defendant is … failure to serve an AOM, which was granted. The Appellate Division reversed, determining that an AOM is not required …
-
njcourts.gov
… to disclose Machuca on her application. CURE then filed a complaint. It sought a declaratory judgment, including a … law. CURE appealed, and, in a split decision, the Appellate Division affirmed. 432 N.J. Super. 526 (App. Div. 2013). The … Noting that the Legislature might wish to consider revisiting the issue, the Appellate Division majority …
-
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … In the Matter of William R. Hendrickson, Jr., Department of Community Affairs (A-12-17) (079885) Argued April 9, 2018 -- … the Commission’s final agency decision to the Appellate Division. The contested issues concerned the quantum of …
-
njcourts.gov
… SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2643-21 SYLVIA MELANIA TEJADA DE … BII CORP., a/k/a B2 CORP., CHST OF NJ, LLC, Defendants, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE … Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant- Respondent. …
njcourts.gov
… the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither … of defendant’s blood. At the time of the accident, it was common practice in the Freehold Township Police Department … and State v. Adkins, 221 N.J. 300, 303 (2015). An Appellate Division panel affirmed, substantially for the reasons …