njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2210-21 A-2223-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to terminate parental rights was clearly and convincingly supported by the voluminous evidentiary record and affirm. … May trial date, explaining going to trial on a permanency determination without counsel would be a "mistake." After an …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-2210-21 A-2223-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … to terminate parental rights was clearly and convincingly supported by the voluminous evidentiary record and affirm. … May trial date, explaining going to trial on a permanency determination without counsel would be a "mistake." After an …
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-5099-15T3 A-5390-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … she would need to separate from John and would need massive support. Dr. Mack recommended ongoing psychiatric … 2015, the court approved the Division's permanency plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. On …
-
njcourts.gov
… DOCKET NO. A-5099-15T3 A-5390-15T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … she would need to separate from John and would need massive support. Dr. Mack recommended ongoing psychiatric … 2015, the court approved the Division's permanency plan for termination of parental rights followed by adoption. On …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1860-19T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the underlying litigation and is not appealing the termination. S.C. and defendant, who were never married, … reversal of the judgment." She asserts "the record does not support the [judge's] conclusion." The Law Guardian …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1860-19T1 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in the underlying litigation and is not appealing the termination. S.C. and defendant, who were never married, … reversal of the judgment." She asserts "the record does not support the [judge's] conclusion." The Law Guardian …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2386-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of his parental rights. 1 This name is … limit significantly his "ability to independently support himself," and concluded his "cognitive limitations …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2386-21 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of his parental rights. 1 This name is … limit significantly his "ability to independently support himself," and concluded his "cognitive limitations …
default
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5292-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … lacked sufficient evidence, concluded erroneously that termination would not do more harm than good and was entered … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5292-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … lacked sufficient evidence, concluded erroneously that termination would not do more harm than good and was entered … there is substantial credible evidence in the record to support the court's findings." N.J. Div. of Youth & Family …
njcourts.gov
… We affirm. I. The parties were married in 1990 and two children were born of the marriage, a son born in 1997 and a … his employer. The FJOD also requires defendant to pay child support in the amount of $154 per week. 1 We use initials to … 2006). "[S]uch matters are committed to the discretionary determinations of the Family Part judges, based upon their …
-
njcourts.gov
… We affirm. I. The parties were married in 1990 and two children were born of the marriage, a son born in 1997 and a … his employer. The FJOD also requires defendant to pay child support in the amount of $154 per week. 1 We use initials to … 2006). "[S]uch matters are committed to the discretionary determinations of the Family Part judges, based upon their …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0043-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), alternatives to termination of parental rights. Danielle contends the judge … legal principles, and sufficient credible evidence supports the court's findings. Therefore, we affirm. I. We …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0043-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … test under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15.1(a), alternatives to termination of parental rights. Danielle contends the judge … legal principles, and sufficient credible evidence supports the court's findings. Therefore, we affirm. I. We …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1489-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of her parental rights, substantially for the … defendant required intensive long-term in- home parenting supports and skills training and moved to put them in place …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-1489-18T4 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … in light of the record and controlling law, we affirm the termination of her parental rights, substantially for the … defendant required intensive long-term in- home parenting supports and skills training and moved to put them in place …
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0047-22 A-0048-22 A-2073-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each appeal from the Family Part's September 14, 2021 determination they abused or neglected Callie in violation of … manner, that deviation from the standard of care may support an inference that the child is subject to future …
-
njcourts.gov
… NO. A-0047-22 A-0048-22 A-2073-22 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … each appeal from the Family Part's September 14, 2021 determination they abused or neglected Callie in violation of … manner, that deviation from the standard of care may support an inference that the child is subject to future …
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5221-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reunification but ultimately filed a complaint seeking termination of J.F.H.'s parental rights, with E.J.D.'s … standard. On appeal, J.F.H. argues that the record does not support the trial court's conclusion as to prongs three and …
-
njcourts.gov
… DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5221-17T3 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … reunification but ultimately filed a complaint seeking termination of J.F.H.'s parental rights, with E.J.D.'s … standard. On appeal, J.F.H. argues that the record does not support the trial court's conclusion as to prongs three and …